Effect anticipation and action control

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 229-240

  Elsner, Birgit ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85047681886     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Conflict and choice time. British Journal of Psychology, 7, 106-118.
2. Brogden, W. J. (1962). Contiguous conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 172-176.
3. Diamond, A. (1990). Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases of inhibitory control in reaching. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 637-669.
4. Greenwald, A. G. (1970a). A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 20-25.
5. Greenwald, A. G. (1970b). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
6. Hall, J. F. (1984). Backward conditioning in Pavlovian type studies. Re-evaluation and present status. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 19, 163-168.
7. Harless, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens [The apparatus of will]. Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50-73.
8. Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176-186.
9. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Hommel, B. (1998). Perceiving one's own action - and what it leads to. In J. S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems theories and a priori aspects of perception (pp. 143-179). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. Hommel, B., Muesseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (in press). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
12. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
13. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
14. Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or physiology of the soul]. Leipzig, Germany: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.
15. Mackintosh, N. J. (1997). Has the wheel turned full circle? Fifty years of learning theory: 1946-1996. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 879-898.
16. Meck, W. H. (1985). Postreinforcement signal processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 52-70.
17. Meltzoff, A. N. (1993). The centrality of motor coordination and proprioception in social and cognitive development: From shared actions to shared minds. In G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Ed.), The development of coordination in infancy (pp. 463-496). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
18. Piaget, J. (1969). Das Erwachen der Intelligenz beim Kinde [The origin of intelligence in children]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.
19. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167-201). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
20. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
21. Rescorla, R. A. (1992). Response-outcome vs. outcome-response associations in instrumental learning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 20, 223-232.
22. Rescorla, R. A. (1993). Preservation of response-outcome associations through extinction. Animal Learning and Behavior, 21, 238-245.
23. Rescorla, R. A. (1995). Full preservation of a response-outcome associa-tion through training with a second outcome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 252-261.
24. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Krist, H. (1996). Antecedents of action. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action: Vol. 2. Motor skills. London: Academic Press.
25. Schmidt, R. A. (1971). Proprioception and the timing of motor responses. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 383-393.
26. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
27. Tipper, S. P., Bourque, T. A., Anderson, S. H., & Brehaut, J. C. (1989). Mechanisms of attention: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 353-378.
28. Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
29. Trapold, M. A. (1970). Are expectancies based upon different reinforcing events discriminably different? Learning and Motivation, 1, 129-140.
30. Urcuioli, P. J., & DeMarse, T. (1996). Associative processes in differential outcome discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 192-204.
31. Wolff, P. (1987). Perceptual learning by saccades: A cognitive approach. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 249-271). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.