Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object

Cognition

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 350-355

  Jax, Steven A ^a   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^a  

^a MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Action priming; Objects; Selection for action; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE VARIABLE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77649193342     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ansuini C., Giosa L., Turella L., Altoè G., and Castiello U. An object for an action, the same object for other actions: Effects on hand shaping. Experimental Brain Research 185 1 (2008) 111-119
2. Ansuini C., Santello M., Massaccesi S., and Castiello U. Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. Journal of Neurophysiology 95 4 (2006) 2456-2465
3. Baumann M.A., Fluet M., and Scherberger H. Context-specific grasp movement representation in the macaque anterior intraparietal area. Journal of Neuroscience 29 20 (2009) 6436-6448
4. Botvinick M., Buxbaum L.J., Bylsma L., and Jax S.A. Toward an integrated account of object and action selection: A computational analysis and empirical findings from reaching-to-grasp and tool use. Neuropsychologia 47 2 (2009) 671-683
5. Bub D.N., Masson M.E., and Cree G.S. Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition 106 1 (2008) 27-58
6. Buxbaum L.J. Ideomotor apraxia: A call to action. Neurocase 7 (2001) 445-458
7. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K., Grossman M., and Coslett H.B. Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: Evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex 43 3 (2007) 411-423
8. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., Tang K., and Detre J.M. Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI. Brain Research 1117 1 (2006) 175-185
9. Buxbaum L.J., and Saffran E.M. Knowing "how" versus "what for": A new dissociation. Brain and Language 65 (1998) 73-86
10. Buxbaum L.J., Sirigu A., Schwartz M.F., and Klatzky R.L. Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 41 8 (2003) 1091-1113
11. Buxbaum L.J., Veramonti T., and Schwartz M.F. Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing 'what for' but not 'how'. Neurocase 6 (2000) 83-97
12. Cave B.C. Very long-lasting priming in picture naming. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 322-325
13. Cant J.S., Westwood D.A., Valyear K.F., and Goodale M.A. No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 216-226
14. Cohen J.D., Dunbar K., and McClelland J.L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review 97 3 (1990) 332-361
15. Culham J.C., and Valyear K.F. Human parietal cortex in action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16 2 (2006) 205-212
16. Castiello U. Grasping a fruit: Selection for action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 3 (1996) 582-603
17. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Umiltá C.A., and Rizzolatti G. Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. Neuroreport 8 (1996) 347-349
18. Creem-Regehr S., and Lee J. Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special?. Cognitive Brain Research 22 3 (2005) 457-469
19. de-Wit L.H., Kentridge R.W., and Milner A.D. Object-based attention and visual area LO. Neuropsychologia 47 6 (2009) 1483-1490
20. Desimone R., and Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18 (1995) 193-222
21. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 4 (1984) 501-517
22. Duncan J. EPS mid-career award 2004: Brain mechanisms of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Colchester) 59 1 (2006) 2-27
23. Duncan J., Humphreys G., and Ward R. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 7 2 (1997) 255-261
24. Fanini A., Nobre A.C., and Chelazzi L. Selecting and ignoring the component features of a visual object: A negative priming paradigm. Visual Cognition 14 (2006) 584-618
25. Garofeanu C., Kroliczak G., Goodale M.A., and Humphrey G.K. Naming and grasping common objects: A priming study. Experimental Brain Research 159 (2004) 55-64
26. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., and Martin A. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Science 10 (2006) 14-23
27. He X., Humphreys G., Fan S., Chen L., and Han S. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: An event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. Brain Research 1245 (2008) 116-125
28. Humphreys G.W., and Riddoch M.J. Detection by action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nature 4 (2001) 84-88
29. Jax S.A., and Rosenbaum D.A. Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 (2007) 425-441
30. Jax S.A., and Rosenbaum D.A. Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information. Neuropsychologia 47 (2009) 1573-1577
31. Johnson-Frey S.H. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 2 (2004) 71-78
32. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 3 (2003) 134-140
33. Nobre A.C., Rao A., and Chelazzi L. Selective attention to specific features within objects: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 4 (2006) 539-561
34. Pavese A., and Buxbaum L. Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action. Visual Cognition 9 4/5 (2002) 559-590
35. Pisella L., Binkofski F., Lasek K., Toni I., and Rossetti Y. No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: Multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations. Neuropsychologia 44 13 (2006) 2734-2748
36. Prabhu G., Lemon R., and Haggard P. On-line control of grasping actions: Object-specific motor facilitation requires sustained visual input. Journal of Neuroscience 27 46 (2007) 12651-12654
37. Rafal R.D., Ward R., and Danziger S. Selection for action and selection for awareness: Evidence from hemispatial neglect. Brain Research 1080 1 (2006) 2-8
38. Rizzolatti G., and Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research 153 2 (2003) 146-157
39. Sinnett S., Snyder J.J., and Kinstone A. Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in visual object-based selective attention. Experimental Brain Research 194 2 (2009) 191-196
40. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.-R., Cohen L., Pillon B., Dubois B., and Agid Y. The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science 273 (1996) 1564-1568
41. Tessari A., and Rumiati R.I. The strategic control of multiple routes in imitation of actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 6 (2004) 1107-1116
42. Tipper S.P., Howard L.A., and Jackson S.R. Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition 4 (1997) 1-38
43. Tucker M., and Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 3 (1998) 830-846
44. Ward R. Interactions between perception and action systems: A model for selective attention. In: Humphreys G.W., Duncan J., and Treisman A. (Eds). Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford 311-332
45. Wegener D., Ehn F., Aurich M.K., Galashan F.O., and Kreiter A.K. Feature-based attention and the suppression of non-relevant object features. Vision Research 48 27 (2008) 2696-2707