Cognition, action, and object manipulation

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 138, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 924-946

  Rosenbaum, David A ^a   Chapman, Kate M ^a   Weigelt, Matthias ^b   Weiss, Daniel J ^a   van der Wel, Robrecht ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Cognition; Motor control; Object manipulation; Reaching

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BODY POSTURE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; EVOLUTION; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; INFANT; LEMURIDAE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; RHESUS MONKEY; SAGUINUS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TOOL USE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT BEHAVIOR; LEMUR; MACACA MULATTA; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SAGUINUS; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84870883501     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0027839     Document Type: Article

References (156)

1. Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 50-68. doi:10.1037/a0014411
2. Adalbjornsson, C. F., Fischman, M. G., & Rudisill, M. E. (2008). The end-state comfort effect in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 36-41.
3. Arbib, M. A., Bonaiuto, J. B., Jacobs, S., & Frey, S. H. (2009). Tool use and the distalization of the end-effector. Psychological Research, 73, 441-462. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0242-2
4. Baber, C. (2003). Cognition and tool use: Forms of engagement in human and animal use of tools. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
5. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
7. Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. London, England: Pergamon.
8. Borys, S. V., Spitz, H. H., & Dorans, B. A. (1982). Tower of Hanoi performance of retarded young adults and nonretarded children as a function of solution length and goal state. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 87-110. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(82)90008-X
9. Butz, M. V., Herbort, O., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). Exploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: Unsupervised learning in a modular sensorimotor control architecture. Psychological Review, 114, 1015-1046. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.1015
10. Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., & Hare, T. A. (2008). The adolescent brain. In A. Kingstone & M. B. Miller (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 1124. The year in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 111-126). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.
11. Chang, L. Y., Klatzky, R. L., & Pollard, N. S. (2010). Selection criteria for preparatory object rotation in manual lifting actions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 42, 11-27. doi:10.1080/00222890903269195
12. Chapman, K. M., Weiss, D. J., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Evolutionary roots of motor planning: The end-state comfort effect in lemurs. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124, 229-232. doi:10.1037/a0018025
13. Coelho, C. J., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Studenka, B. E. (2011, November). Constraints for motor planning: End-state comfort is more important than handedness. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, WA.
14. Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where objects are grasped reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486-495. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1862-9
15. Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2011). Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: Planning grasps for object rotation and translation. Psychological Research, 75, 341-349. doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0311-6
16. Cowie, D., Smith, L., & Braddick, O. (2010). The development of locomotor planning for end-state comfort. Perception, 39, 661-670. doi: 10.1068/p6343
17. Crajé, C., Aarts, P., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M., & Steenbergen, B. (2010). Action planning in typical and atypical developing children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1039-1046. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.04.007
18. Crajé, C., van der Kamp, J., & Steenbergen, B. (2009). Visual information for action planning in left and right congenital hemiparesis. Brain Research, 1261, 54-64. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.074
19. Darwin, C. R. (1965). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1872).
20. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
21. DeSilva, H. R., Robinson, P., & Frisbee, W. H. (1941). Army motor transport personnel. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 313-321. doi:10.1037/h0063163.ISSN:0033-2909
22. Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Kennerley, S., & Ivry, R. B. (2001). Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12, 493-498. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00391
23. Dijkerman, H. C., McIntosh, R. D., Schindler, I., Nijboer, T. C. W., & Milner, A. D. (2009). Choosing between alternative wrist postures: Action planning needs perception. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1476-1482. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.002
24. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.
25. Elliott, D., Hansen, S., Grierson, L. E., Lyons, J., Bennett, S. J., & Hayes, S. J. (2010). Goal-directed aiming: Two components but multiple processes. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1023-1044. doi:10.1037/a0020958
26. Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 342-357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.342
27. Elsinger, C. L., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2003). End posture selection in manual positioning: Evidence for feedforward modeling based on a movement choice method. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 499-509. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1573-7
28. Fattori, P., Breveglieri, R., Marzocchi, N., Filippini, D., Bosco, A., & Galletti, C. (2009). Hand orientation during reach-to-grasp movements modulates neuronal activity in the medial posterior parietal area V6A. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 1928-1936. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4998-08.2009
29. Fetter, M., Misslisch, H., & Tweed, D. (Eds.). (1997). Three-dimensional kinematics of eye, head, and limb movements. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic.
30. Fischman, M. G. (1997). End-state comfort in object manipulation [Abstract]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(Suppl.), A-60.
31. Fischman, M. G., Stodden, D. F., & Lehman, D. M. (2003). The end-state comfort effect in bimanual grip selection. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 17-24.
32. Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements with stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492. doi:10.1037/h0054967
33. Fowler, C. A. (2007). Speech production. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 489-502). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & McCabe, G. (1991). Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychologica, 77, 137-151. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(91)90028-X
35. Freeman, R. N. (1987). The apraxias, purposeful motor behavior, and left-hemisphere function. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 29-50). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
36. Gallistel, C. R. (1999). Coordinate transformations in the genesis of directed action. In B. M. Bly & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Cognitive science (pp. 1-42). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
39. Gielen, C. C. A. M., Vrijenhoek, E. J., & Flash, T. (1997). Principles for the control of kinematically redundant limbs. In M. Fetter, H. Misslisch, & D. Tweed (Eds.), Three-dimensional kinematics of eye, head, and limb movements (pp. 285-297). Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic.
40. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-19.
41. Glencross, D. J. (1977). Control of skilled movements. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 14-29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.1.14
42. Glover, S. (2002). Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 288-292. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02) 01920-4
43. Gonzalez, D. A., Studenka, B. E., Glazebrook, C. M., & Lyons, J. L. (2011). Extending end-state comfort effect: Do we consider the beginning state comfort of another? Acta Psychologica, 136, 347-353. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.009
44. Haggard, P. (1998). Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychologica, 99, 201-215. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00011-0
45. Hauser, M. D. (1997). Artifactual kinds and functional design features: What a primate understands without language. Cognition, 64, 285-308. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00028-0
46. Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (Eds.). (1985). Clinical neuropsychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47. Helmholtz, H. (1962). Handbook of physiological optics. New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1866)
48. Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2010). Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 867-878. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2191-9
49. Hermsdörfer, J., Laimgruber, K., Kerkhoff, G., Mai, N., & Goldenberg, G. (1999). Effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination, and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 41-51. doi:10.1007/s002210050815
50. Heuer, H. (2003). Motor control. In A. Healy & R. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp. 317-354). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
51. Hodos, W., & Campbell, B. (1990). Evolutionary scales and comparative studies of animal cognition. In R. Kesner & D. Olton (Eds.), Neurobiology of comparative cognition (pp. 1-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Horvath, J. E., Weisrock, D. W., Embry, S. L., Fiorentino, I., Balhoff, J. P., Kappeler, P,...Yoder, A. D. (2008). Development and application of a phylogenomic toolkit: Resolving the evolutionary history of Madagascar's lemurs. Genome Research, 18, 489-499. doi:10.1101/gr.7265208
53. Howard, I. P., & Templeton, W. B. (1966). Human spatial orientation. New York, NY: Wiley.
54. Hughes, C. (1996). Planning problems in autism at the level of motor control. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 99-107. doi:10.1007/BF02276237
55. Hughes, C. M., & Franz, E. A. (2008). Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects. Experimental Brain Research, 188, 541-550. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1387-8
56. Iverson, J. M. (2010). Developing language in a developing body: The relationship between motor development and language development. Journal of Child Language, 37, 229-261. doi:10.1017/S0305000909990432
57. Ivry, R. B., Diedrichsen, J., Spencer, R. M. C., Hazeltine, E., & Semjen, A. (2004). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on bimanual coordination and interference. In S. P. Swinnen & J. Duysens (Eds.), Interlimb coordination (pp. 259-295). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
58. Janssen, L., Beuting, M., Meulenbroek, R., & Steenbergen, B. (2009). Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance. Experimental Brain Research, 192, 61-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1554-y
59. Janssen, L., Crajé, C., Weigelt, M., & Steenbergen, B. (2010). Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: Two plans for two hands? Motor Control, 14, 240-254.
60. Jax, S. A., Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (2003). Computational motor control and human factors: Modeling movements in real and possible environments. Human Factors, 45, 5-27. doi:10.1518/hfes.45.1.5.27226
61. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00034026
62. Johnson, S. H. (1998). Cerebral organization of motor imagery: Contralateral control of grip selection in mentally represented prehension. Psychological Science, 9, 219-222. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00042
63. Johnson, S. H. (2000). Thinking ahead: The case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension. Cognition, 74, 33-70. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00063-3
64. Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 71-78. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.002
65. Jovanovic, B., & Schwarzer, G. (2011). Learning to grasp efficiently: The development of motor planning and the role of observational learning. Vision Research, 51, 945-954. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.003
66. Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387-403. doi:10.1037/h0026739
67. Keen, R. (2011). The development of problem solving in young children: A critical cognitive skill. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 1-21. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130730
68. Kelso, J. A. S. (1984). Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative, 246, 1000-1004.
69. Kelso, J. A. S., Buchanan, J. J., & Murata, T. (1994). Multifunctionality and switching in the coordination dynamics of reaching and grasping. Human Movement Science, 13, 63-94. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(94) 90029-9
70. Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D. L., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 229-238. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.2.229
71. Klapp, S. T., & Jagacinski, R. J. (2011). Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 443-462. doi:10.1037/a0022361
72. Klatzky, R. L., Fikes, T. G., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1995). Planning for hand shape and arm transport when reaching for objects. Acta Psychologica, 88, 209-232. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(93)E0068-D
73. Klatzky, R. L., Pellegrino, J., McCLoskey, B. P., & Lederman, S. J. (1993). Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects. Memory & Cognition, 21, 294-303. doi:10.3758/BF03208262
74. Kunde, W., & Weigelt, M. (2005). Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 145-156. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.145
75. Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control in everyday actions. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
76. Lewin, K. (1922a). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation [The problem of measuring will and the basic law of association]. I. Psychologische Forschung, 1, 191-302. doi:10.1007/BF00410391
77. Lewin, K. (1922b). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation [The problem of measuring will and the basic law of association]. II. Psychologische Forschung, 2, 65-140. doi:10.1007/BF02412947
78. Lippa, Y., & Adam, J. J. (2001). An explanation of orthogonal SR compatibility effects that vary with hand or response position: The end-state comfort hypothesis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 63, 156-174. doi:10.3758/BF03200510
79. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
80. Logan, S. W., & Fischman, M. G. (2011). The relationship between end-state comfort effects and memory performance in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica, 137, 292-299. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.03.009
81. Manoel, E. J., & Moreira, C. R. P. (2005). Planning manipulative hand movements: Do young children show the end-state comfort effect? Journal of Human Movement Studies, 49, 93-114.
82. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
83. McCarty, M. E., Clifton, R. K., & Collard, R. R. (1999). Problem solving in infancy: The emergence of an action plan. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1091-1101. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.1091
84. Mendoza, J. E., Elliott, D., Meegan, D. V., Lyons, J. L., & Welsh, T. N. (2006). The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 413-422. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.413
85. Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
86. Michaels, C. F., & Stins, J. F. (1996). An ecological approach to stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 333-360). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
87. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88. Mitra, S., & Turvey, M. T. (2004). A rotation invariant in 3-D reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 163-179. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.163
89. Morasso, P., & Sanguineti, V. (1995). Self-organizing body schema for motor planning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 52-66. doi:10.1080/00222895.1995.9941699
90. Mutsaarts, M., Steenbergen, B., & Bekkering, H. (2006). Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Experimental Brain Research, 172, 151-162. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0327-0
91. Mutsaarts, M., Steenbergen, B., & Meulenbroek, R. G. (2004). A detailed analysis of the planning and execution of prehension movements by three adolescents with spastic hemiparesis. Experimental Brain Research, 156, 293-304. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1789-6
92. Nathanson, Y. S. (1932). Review of variations in development and motor control in goiterous and non-goiterous adolescent girls. Psychological Bulletin, 29, 304-305. doi:10.1037/h0067934
93. Nelson, E. L., Berthier, N. E., Metevier, C. M., & Novak, M. A. (2011). Evidence for motor planning in monkeys: Rhesus macaques select efficient grips when transporting spoons. Developmental Science, 14, 822-831. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01030.x
94. Newman, C. (2001). The planning and control of action in normal infants and children with Williams syndrome (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University College London, London, England.
95. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
96. Osiurak, F., Aubin, G., Allain, P., Jarry, C., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., Richard, I., & Le Gall, D. (2008). Different constraints on grip selection in brain-damaged patients: Object use versus object transport. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2431-2434. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.018
97. Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709-730. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.709
98. Pashler, H., Ramachandran, V. S., & Becker, M. (2006). Attending to a misoriented word causes the eyeball to rotate in the head. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 954-957. doi:10.3758/BF03213908
99. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, G. (Eds.). (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
100. Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Distance perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 131-135. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00422.x
101. Ray, M., & Welsh, T. N. (2011). Response selection during a joint action task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43, 329-332. doi:10.1080/00222895.2011.592871
102. Rinn, W. E. (1984). The neuropsychology of facial expression: A review of the neurological and psychological mechanisms for producing facial expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 52-77. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.52
103. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
104. Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
105. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2005). The Cinderella of psychology: The neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior. American Psychologist, 60, 308-317. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.4.308
106. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2009). Walking down memory lane: Where walkers look as they descend stairs provides hints about how they control their walking behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 122, 425-430.
107. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Human motor control (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
108. Rosenbaum, D. A., Coelho, C. J., Rhode, J. D., & Santamaria, J. P. (2010). Psychologically distinct classes of motor behavior inferred from individual differences: Evidence from a sequential stacking task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 42, 187-194. doi:10.1080/00222891003757618
109. Rosenbaum, D. A., Engelbrecht, S. E., Bushe, M. M., & Loukopoulos, L. D. (1993). Knowledge model for selecting and producing reaching movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 217-227. doi:10.1080/00222895.1993.9942051
110. Rosenbaum, D. A., Halloran, E., & Cohen, R. G. (2006). Grasping movement plans. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 918-922. doi:10.3758/BF03194019
111. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control. Human Movement Science, 11, 61-69. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(92)90050-L
112. Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. M., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102, 28-67. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.28
113. Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J., & Jorgensen, M. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 321-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
114. Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108, 709-734. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.709
115. Rosenbaum, D. A., van Heugten, C., & Caldwell, G. C. (1996). From cognition to biomechanics and back: The end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychologica, 94, 59-85. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(95)00062-3
116. Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H. J., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Time course of movement planning: Selection of hand grips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1058-1073. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1058
117. Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Jorgensen, M. J., Barnes, H. J., & Stewart, E. (1993). Plans for object manipulation. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIV: A silver jubilee: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 803-820). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
118. Santamaria, J. P. (2008). Social effects on action planning (Unpublished master's thesis). Department of Psychology, the Pennsylvania State University.
119. Santamaria, J. P., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2011). Etiquette and effort: Holding doors for others. Psychological Science, 22, 584-588. doi: 10.1177/0956797611406444
120. Santos, L. R., Pearson, H. M., Spaepen, G. M., Tsao, F., & Hauser, M. D. (2006). Probing the limits of tool competence: Experiments with two non-tool-using species (Cercopithecus aethiops and Saguinus oedipus). Animal Cognition, 9, 94-109. doi:10.1007/s10071-005-0001-8
121. Schütz, C., Weigelt, M., Odekerken, D., Klein-Soetebier, T., & Schack, T. (2011). Motor control strategies in a continuous task space. Motor Control, 15, 321-341.
122. Shettleworth, S. J. (2010). Cognition, evolution and behaviour (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
123. Short, M. W., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: End-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychologica, 96, 133-147. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00006-1
124. Short, M. W., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1999). Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect. Acta Psychologica, 100, 243-252. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00020-1
125. Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. (2006). Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams.
126. Smyth, M. M., & Mason, U. C. (1997). Planning and execution of action in children with or without developmental coordination disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 1023-1037. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01619.x
127. Soechting, J. F., Buneo, C. A., Herrmann, U., & Flanders, M. (1995). Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: Does Donders' law apply to arm movement? Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 6271-6280.
128. Steenbergen, B., & Gordon, A. M. (2006). Activity limitation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: Evidence for disorders in motor planning. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 48, 780-783. doi:10.1017/S0012162206001666
129. Steenbergen, B., Hulstijn, W., & Dortmans, S. (2000). Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy: Minimising discomfort. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 385-397. doi:10.1007/s002210000458
130. Steenbergen, B., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Constraints on grip selection in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: Effects of lesional side, end-point accuracy and context. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 145-159. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.11.008
131. Stelmach, G. E., Castiello, U., & Jeannerod, M. (1994). Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 178-186. doi:10.1080/00222895.1994.9941672
132. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
133. Thibaut, J.-P., & Toussaint, L. (2010). Developing motor planning over ages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 116-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.003
134. Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.891
135. Turvey, M. T. (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist, 51, 1134-1152. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1134
136. Turvey, M. T. (2007). Action and perception at the level of synergies. Human Movement Science, 26, 657-697. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.04.002
137. van der Wel, R. P., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance. Experimental Brain Research, 205, 351-362. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2368-2
138. van Swieten, L. M., van Bergen, E., Williams, J. H. G., Wilson, A. D., Plumb, M. S., Kent, S. W., & Mon-Williams, M. A. (2010). A test of motor (not executive) planning in developmental coordination disorder and autism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 493-499. doi:10.1037/a0017177
139. Vasudevan, E. V., Torres-Oviedo, G., Morton, S. M., Yang, J. F., & Bastian, A. J. (2011). Younger is not always better: Development of locomotor adaptation from childhood to adulthood. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3055-3065. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5781-10.2011
140. Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Comparative cognition: Beginning the second century of the study of animal intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 211-228. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.211
141. Weigelt, M. (2007). Re-examining structural constraints on the initiation of bimanual movements: The role of starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations. Human Movement Science, 26, 212-225. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.010
142. Weigelt, M., Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Returning home: Locations rather than movements are recalled in human object manipulation. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 191-198. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0780-4
143. Weigelt, M., Kunde, W., & Prinz, W. (2006). End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Experimental Psychology, 53, 143-148. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.2.143
144. Weigelt, M., Rosenbaum, D. A., Huelshorst, S., & Schack, T. (2009). Moving and memorizing: Motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica, 132, 68-79. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.06.005
145. Weigelt, M., & Schack, T. (2010). The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children. Experimental Psychology, 57, 476-482. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000059
146. Weiss, D. J., & Wark, J. (2009). Hysteresis effect in a motor task in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 427-433. doi:10.1037/a0013964
147. Weiss, D. J., Wark, J. D., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: The end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Psychological Science, 18, 1063-1068. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02026.x
148. Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2004). Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 57(A), 1031-1057. doi:10.1080/02724980343000666
149. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636. doi:10.3758/BF03196322
150. Winters, J. M., & Kleweno, D. G. (1993). Effect of initial upper-limb alignment on muscle contributions to isometric strength curves. Journal of Biomechanics, 26, 143-153. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(93)90045-G
151. Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3 (3, No. 13), 1-119. doi:10.1037/h0092992
152. Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
153. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt.
154. Wright, C. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1983). Conditions for a linear speed-accuracy trade-off in aimed movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 35(A), 279-296. doi:10.1080/14640748308402134
155. Zhang, W., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2008). Planning for manual positioning: The end-state comfort effect for abduction-adduction of the hand. Experimental Brain Research, 184, 383-389. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1106-x
156. Zimmerman, M., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & de Lange, F. P. (2011). Motor planning is facilitated by adopting an action's goal posture: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 122-131. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr098