Features of Planned Hand Actions Influence Identification of Graspable Objects

Psychological Science

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1269-1276

  Bub, Daniel N ^a   Masson, Michael E J ^a   Lin, Terry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

action representations; motor processes; object identification; theory of event coding

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880077811     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612472909     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barsalou L.,Sloman S.,Chaigneau S.Functional features in language and space: Insights from perception, categorization, and development. Carlson L.Van Der Zee E., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005:131-148.
2. Bub D. N.,Masson M. E. J.Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2010;36:341-358.
3. Campanella F.,Shallice T.Manipulability and object recognition: Is manipulability a semantic feature.Experimental Brain Research. 2011;208:369-383.
4. Deubel H.,Schneider W. X.,Paprotta I.Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception.Visual Cognition. 1998;5:81-107.
5. Helbig H. B.,Graf M.,Kiefer M.The role of action representations in visual object recognition.Experimental Brain Research. 2006;174:221-228.
6. Hommel B.Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004;8:494-500.
7. Hommel B.How much attention does an event file need?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2005;31:1067-1082.
8. Hommel B.Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding).Psychological Research. 2009;73:512-526.
9. Hommel B.,Müsseler J.,Aschersleben G.,Prinz W.The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning [Target article and commentaries].Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2001;24:849-937.
10. Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Hommel B.Prinz W., ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland; 1997:.
11. Hommel B.,Proctor R. W.,Vu K.-P. L.A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task.Psychological Research. 2004;68:1-17.
12. Hommel B.,Schneider W. X.Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes.Visual Cognition. 2002;9:392-420.
13. Kiefer M.,Pulvermüller F.Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence, and future directions.Cortex. 2012;48:805-825.
14. Kiefer M.,Sim E.-J.,Liebich S.,Hauk O.,Tanaka J.Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2007;19:525-542.
15. Loftus G. R.,Masson M. E. J.Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1994;1:476-490.
16. Mahon B. Z.,Caramazza A.A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content.Journal of Physiology-Paris. 2008;102:59-70.
17. Martin A.,Haxby J. V.,Lalonde F. M.,Wiggs C. L.,Ungerleider L. G.Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action.Science. 1995;270:102-105.
18. Martin A.,Wiggs C. L.,Ungerleider L. G.,Haxby J. V.Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge.Nature. 1996;379:649-652.
19. Meteyard L.,Cuadrado S. R.,Bahrami B.,Vigliocco G.Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics.Cortex. 2012;48:788-804.
20. Perone S.,Madole K. L.,Oakes L. M.Learning how actions function: The role of outcomes in infants' representation of events.Infant Behavior & Development. 2011;34:351-362.
21. Stoet G.,Hommel B.Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action. Prinz W.Hommel B., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2002:538-552.
22. Sumner P.,Husain M.At the edge of consciousness: Automatic motor activation and voluntary control.The Neuroscientist. 2008;15:474-486.
23. Thomaschke R.,Hopkins B.,Miall R. C.The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: Reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects.Psychological Review. 2012;119:388-407.
24. Ulrich R.,Miller J.Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1994;123:34-80.
25. Wickens D. D.,Born D. G.,Allen C. K.Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1963;2:440-445.
26. Wierzbicka A.Cups and mugs: Lexicography and conceptual analysis.Australian Journal of Linguistics. 1984;4:205-255.
27. Witt J. K.,Kemmerer D.,Linkenauger S. A.,Culham J.A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools.Psychological Science. 2010;21:1215-1219.