Pouring or chilling a bottle of wine: An fMRI study on the prospective planning of object-directed actions

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 218, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 189-200

  Van Elk, M ^a   Viswanathan, S ^b   Van Schie, H T ^c   Bekkering, H ^d   Grafton, S T ^b  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action planning; Action semantics; Goals; Grips; Objects; Superior parietal cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INSULA; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NERVE CELL; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PLANNING; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH BRUSHING; WINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GOALS; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; INTENTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84862867328     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3016-9     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Beauchamp MS, Martin A (2007) Grounding object concepts in perception and action: evidence from fMRI studies of tools. Cortex 43:461-468. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70470-2 (Pubitemid 46744683)
2. Beilock SL, Lyons IM, Mattarella-Micke A, Nusbaum HC, Small SL (2008) Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13269-13273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803424105
3. Biro D, Inoue-Nakamura N, Tonooka R, Yamakoshi G, Sousa C, Matsuzawa T (2003) Cultural innovation and transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees: evidence from field experiments. Anim Cogn 6:213-223. doi:10.1007/s10071-003- 0183-x (Pubitemid 38284586)
4. Bonini L, Rozzi S, Serventi FU, Simone L, Ferrari PF, Fogassi L (2010) Ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices make distinct contribution to action organization and intention understanding. Cereb Cortex 20:1372-1385. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp200
5. Brass M, Haggard P (2010) The hidden side of intentional action: the role of the anterior insular cortex. Brain Struct Funct 214:603-610. doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0269-6
6. Buracas GT, Boynton GM (2002) Efficient design of event-related fMRI experiments using M-sequences. Neuroimage 16:801-813. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1116 (Pubitemid 34852443)
7. Burgess PW, Veitch E, de Lacy Costello A, Shallice T (2000) The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking. Neuropsychologia 38:848-863. doi:S0028-3932(99)00134-7 (Pubitemid 30109462)
8. Buxbaum LJ, Kyle K, Grossman M, Coslett HB (2007) Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex 43:411-423. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70466-0 (Pubitemid 46744681)
9. Chao LL, Martin A (2000) Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12:478-484. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0635
10. Chapman KM, Weiss DJ, Rosenbaum DA (2010) Evolutionary roots of motor planning: the end-state comfort effect in lemurs. J Comp Psychol 124:229-232. doi:10.1037/a0018025
11. Cohen RG, Rosenbaum DA (2004) Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans. Exp Brain Res 157:486-495. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1862-9 (Pubitemid 39119302)
12. Cohen RG, Rosenbaum DA (2011) Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: planning grasps for object rotation and translation. Psychol Res 75:341-349. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0311-6
13. Connine CM, Mullennix J, Shernoff E, Yelen J (1990) Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 16:1084-1096. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1084
14. Cooper R (2002) Order and disorder in everyday action: the roles of contention scheduling and supervisory attention. Neurocase 8:61-79. doi:10.1093/neucas/8.1.61 (Pubitemid 34552341)
15. Creem SH, Proffitt DR (2001) Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:218-228. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.218 (Pubitemid 33594510)
16. de Lange FP, Hagoort P, Toni I (2005) Neural topography and content of movement representations. J Cogn Neurosci 17:97-112. doi: 10.1162/ 0898929052880039
17. de Lange FP, Helmich RC, Toni I (2006) Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 33:609-617. doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2006.07.017 (Pubitemid 44485571)
18. Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R (2005) Detecting and adjusting for artifacts in fMRI time series data. Neuroimage 27:624-634. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005. 04.039 (Pubitemid 41139934)
19. Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, Zilles K (2005) A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 25:1325-1335. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage. 2004.12.034 (Pubitemid 40591672)
20. Farrer C, Frith CD (2002) Experiencing oneself vs. another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage 15:596-603. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1009 (Pubitemid 34852527)
21. Fink GR, Frackowiak RS, Pietrzyk U, Passingham RE (1997) Multiple nonprimary motor areas in the human cortex. J Neurophysiol 77:2164-2174 (Pubitemid 27175001)
22. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G (2005) Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308:662-667. doi:10.1126/science.1106138 (Pubitemid 40594381)
23. Fontana AP, Kilner JM, Rodrigues EC, Joffily M, Nighoghossian N, Vargas CD, Sirigu A(2011) Role of the parietal cortexinpredicting incoming actions. Neuroimage. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011. 07.046
24. Gainotti G (2011) The organization and dissolution of semantic-conceptual knowledge: is the 'amodal hub' the only plausible model? Brain Cogn 75:299-309. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2010.12.001
25. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdal
26. Grafton ST (2009) Embodied cognition and the simulation of action to understand others. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1156:97-117. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009. 04425.x
27. Grafton ST, Hamilton AF (2007) Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum Mov Sci 26:590-616. doi:10.1016/j.humov. 2007.05.009 (Pubitemid 47324192)
28. Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G (1997) Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6:231-236. doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0293 (Pubitemid 28018712)
29. Grezes J, Tucker M, Armony J, Ellis R, Passingham RE (2003) Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur J Neurosci 17:2735-2740. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02695.x (Pubitemid 36819298)
30. Hamilton AF, Grafton ST (2006) Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci 26:1133-1137. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4551-05. 2006 (Pubitemid 43237045)
31. Hamilton AF, Grafton ST (2008) Action outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 18:1160-1168. doi:10.1093/cercor/ bhm150
32. Handy TC, Tipper CM, Schaich Borg J, Grafton ST, Gazzaniga MS (2006) Motor experience with graspable objects reduces their implicit analysis in visual- and motor-related cortex. Brain Res 1097:156-166. doi:10.1016/j. brainres.2006.04.059 (Pubitemid 44063488)
33. Hayashi M, Mizuno Y, Matsuzawa T (2005) How does stone-tool use emerge? Introduction of stones and nuts to naive chimpanzees in captivity. Primates 46:91-102. doi:10.1007/s10329-004-0110-z (Pubitemid 41349101)
34. Herbort O, Butz MV (2011) Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling. Exp Brain Res 213:371-382. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011- 2787-8
35. Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:849-878; discussion 878-937 (Pubitemid 34965924)
36. Johnson-Frey SH (2003) What's so special about human tool use? Neuron 39:201-204. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00424-0 (Pubitemid 36897543)
37. Kalenine S, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB (2010) Critical brain regions for action recognition: lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. Brain 133:3269-3280. doi:10.1093/brain/awq210
38. Karnath HO, Baier B (2010) Right insula for our sense of limb ownership and self-awareness of actions. Brain Struct Funct 214:411-417. doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0250-4
39. Kellenbach ML, Brett M, Patterson K (2003) Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. J Cogn Neurosci 15:30-46. doi: 10.1162/089892903321107800 (Pubitemid 36106261)
40. Koechlin E, Basso G, Pietrini P, Panzer S, Grafman J (1999) The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition. Nature 399:148-151. doi:10.1038/20178 (Pubitemid 29230433)
41. Kunde W, Hoffmann J, Zellmann P (2002) The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta Psychologica (Amst) 109:137-155
42. Lambon Ralph MA, Graham KS, Ellis AW, Hodges JR (1998) Naming in semantic dementia-what matters? Neuropsychologia 36:775-784. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97) 00169-3 (Pubitemid 28404326)
43. Lewis JW (2006) Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscientist 12:211-231. doi:10.1177/1073858406288327 (Pubitemid 43725832)
44. Lindemann O, Stenneken P, van Schie HT, Bekkering H (2006) Semantic activation in action planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32:633-643. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.633 (Pubitemid 44195472)
45. Majdandzic J, Grol MJ, van Schie HT, Verhagen L, Toni I, Bekkering H (2007) The role of immediate and final goals in action planning: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 37:589-598. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.071 (Pubitemid 47444251)
46. Manthey S, Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY (2003) Premotor cortex in observing erroneous action: an fMRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 15:296-307. doi:S092664100200201X (Pubitemid 36084375)
47. Marangon M, Jacobs S, Frey SH (2011) Evidence for context sensitivity of grasp representations in human parietal and premotor cortices. J Neurophysiol 105:2536-2546. doi:10.1152/jn. 00796.2010
48. Mizelle JC, Tang T, Pirouz N, Wheaton LA (2011) Forming tool use representations: a neurophysiological investigation into tool exposure. J Cogn Neurosci 23:2920-2934. doi:10.1162/jocn-a-00004
49. Mohamed MA, Yousem DM, Tekes A, Browner N, Calhoun VD(2004) Correlation between the amplitude of cortical activation and reaction time: a functional MRI study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:759-765 (Pubitemid 39145327)
50. Montaldi D, Spencer TJ, Roberts N, Mayes AR (2006) The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus 16:504-520. doi:10.1002/hipo.20178 (Pubitemid 44712075)
51. Mufson EJ, Mesulam MM (1982) Insula of the old world monkey. II: Afferent cortical input and comments on the claustrum. J Comp Neurol 212:23-37. doi:10.1002/cne.902120103 (Pubitemid 13208307)
52. Mutschler I, Wieckhorst B, Kowalevski S, Derix J, Wentlandt J, Schulze-Bonhage A, Ball T (2009) Functional organization of the human anterior insular cortex. Neurosci Lett 457:66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.101
53. Newman-Norlund R, van Schie HT, van Hoek ME, Cuijpers RH, Bekkering H (2010) The role of inferior frontal and parietal areas in differentiating meaningful and meaningless object-directed actions. Brain Res 1315:63-74. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.065
54. Oguz KK, Browner NM, Calhoun VD, Wu C, Kraut MA, Yousem DM (2003) Correlation of functional MR imaging activation data with simple reaction times. Radiology 226:188-194 (Pubitemid 36163928)
55. Patterson K, Nestor PJ, Rogers TT (2007) Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:976-987. doi:10.1038/nrn2277 (Pubitemid 350146937)
56. Prinz W (1997) Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9:129-154 (Pubitemid 127440315)
57. Rosenbaum DA, Cohen RG, Jax SA, Weiss DJ, van der Wel R (2007) The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy. Hum Mov Sci 26:525-554. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.04.001 (Pubitemid 47324187)
58. Rowe JB, Toni I, Josephs O, Frackowiak RS, Passingham RE (2000) The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? Science 288:1656-1660. doi:10.1126/science. 288.5471.1656 (Pubitemid 30387434)
59. Rumiati RI, Zanini S, Vorano L, Shallice T (2001) A form of ideational apraxia as a delective deficit of contention scheduling. Cogn Neuropsychol 18:617-642. doi:10.1080/02643290126375 (Pubitemid 33040023)
60. Rushworth MF, Walton ME, Kennerley SW, Bannerman DM (2004) Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 8:410-417. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.009 (Pubitemid 39179904)
61. Sakai K, Ramnani N, Passingham RE (2002) Learning of sequences of finger movements and timing: frontal lobe and action-oriented representation. J Neurophysiol 88:2035-2046 (Pubitemid 35191201)
62. Schwartz MF (2006) The cognitive neuropsychology of everyday action and planning. Cogn Neuropsychol 23:202-221. doi: 10.1080/02643290500202623 (Pubitemid 43262386)
63. Shima K, Tanji J (2000) Neuronal activity in the supplementary and presupplementary motor areas for temporal organization of multiple movements. J Neurophysiol 84:2148-2160
64. Stapel JC, Hunnius S, van Elk M, Bekkering H (2010) Motor activation during observation of unusual versus ordinary actions in infancy. Soc Neurosci 5:451-460. doi:10.1080/17470919.2010.490667
65. Sunderland A, Wilkins L, Dineen R(2011) Tool use and action planning in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 49:1275-1286. doi:10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2011.01. 020
66. Tessari A, Rumiati RI (2004) The strategic control of multiple routes in imitation of actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:1107-1116. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1107 (Pubitemid 39603853)
67. van Elk M, van Schie HT, Bekkering H (2008) Conceptual knowledge for understanding other's actions is organized primarily around action goals. Exp Brain Res 189:99-107. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1408-7
68. van Elk M, van Schie HT, Bekkering H (2009) Short-term action intentions overrule long-term semantic knowledge. Cognition 111:72-83. doi:10.1016/j. cognition.2008.12.002
69. van Elk M, van Schie HT, Bekkering H (2010a) The N400-concreteness effect reflects the retrieval of semantic information during the preparation of meaningful actions. Biol Psychol 85:134-142. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.06.004
70. van Elk M, van Schie HT, van den Heuvel R, Bekkering H (2010b) Semantics in the motor system: motor-cortical Beta oscillations reflect semantic knowledge of end-postures for object use. Front Hum Neurosci 4:8. doi:10.3389/neuro.09. 008.2010
71. van Schie HT, Bekkering H (2007) Neural mechanisms underlying immediate and final action goals in object use reflected by slow wave brain potentials. Brain Res 1148:183-197. doi:10.1016/j. brainres.2007.02.085 (Pubitemid 46602182)
72. Vingerhoets G, Acke F, Vandemaele P, Achten E (2009) Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements. Neuroimage 47:1832-1843. doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2009.05.100
73. Weiss DJ, Wark JD, Rosenbaum DA (2007) Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: the end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Psychol Sci 18:1063-1068. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02026.x
74. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3(Suppl):1212-1217. doi: 10.1038/81497
75. Wolpert DM, Goodbody SJ, Husain M (1998) Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci 1:529-533. doi:10.1038/2245