The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing

Cognition

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 96-104

  Louwerse, Max M ^a   Jeuniaux, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Amodal; Conceptual processing; Embodied; Embodied cognition; Embodiment factors; Iconicity; Iconicity judgment; Linguistic factors; Modal; Perceptual simulation; Semantic judgment; Symbolic

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SELF CONCEPT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 71549173130     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., and Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59 (2008) 390-412
2. Banks W.P., and Flora J. Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology 3 (1977) 278-290
3. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavior and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 577-660
4. Barsalou L.W., Santos A., Simmons W.K., and Wilson C.D. Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: de Vega M., Glenberg A.M., and Graesser A.C. (Eds). Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (2008), Oxford University Press, Oxford 245-283
5. Benor S.B., and Levy R. The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language 82 (2006) 233-278
6. Brants T., and Franz A. Web 1T 5-gram version 1 (2006), Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia
7. Brysbaert, M. (2007). "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Some simple SPSS solutions to a complex problem (version 2.0). Royal Holloway, University of London. Technical report.
8. Estes Z., Verges M., and Barsalou L.W. Head up, foot down: Object words orient attention to the object's typical location. Psychological Science 19 (2008) 93-97
9. Fraisse P. Motor and verbal reaction times to words and drawings. Psychonomic Science 12 (1968) 235-236
10. Glenberg A.M. What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1997) 1-55
11. In: Landauer T.K., McNamara D.S., Dennis S., and Kintsch W. (Eds). Handbook of latent semantic analysis (2007), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
12. Littell R.C., Stroup W.W., and Freund R.J. SAS for linear models. 4th ed. (2002), SAS Publishing, Cary, NC
13. Locker Jr. L., Hoffman L., and Bovaird J.A. The use of multilevel modeling in the analysis of psycholinguistic data. Behavior Research Methods 39 (2007) 723-730
14. Lockhart R.S., and Craik F.I.M. Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology 44 (1990) 87-112
15. Louwerse M.M. Embodied representations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15 (2008) 838-844
16. Louwerse, M. M. (in press). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science (TopiCS).
17. Louwerse M.M., Cai Z., Hu X., Ventura M., and Jeuniaux P. Cognitively inspired natural-language based knowledge representations: Further explorations of latent semantic analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools 15 (2006) 1021-1039
18. Louwerse M.M., and Jeuniaux P. Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic. In: de Vega M., Glenberg A., and Graesser A.C. (Eds). Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (2008), Oxford University Press, Oxford 309-326
19. Meteyard L., Baharami B., and Vigliocco G. The perceptual grounding of motion verbs. Psychological Science 11 (2007) 1007-1013
20. Paivio A. Imagery, language, and semantic memory. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 5 (1978) 31-47
21. Paivio A. Mental representations: A dual coding approach (1986), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
22. In: Pecher D., and Zwaan R.A. (Eds). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York
23. Pedhazur E. Multiple regression in behavioral research (1997), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
24. Richardson D., and Spivey M. Representation, space, and Hollywood squares: Looking at things that aren't there anymore. Cognition 76 (2000) 269-295
25. Richter T. What is wrong with ANOVA and multiple regression? Analyzing sentence reading times with hierarchical linear models. Discourse Processes 41 (2006) 221-250
26. In: Semin G.R., and Smith E.R. (Eds). Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (2008), Cambridge University Press, New York
27. Šetić M., and Domijan D. The influence of vertical spatial orientation on property verification. Language and Cognitive Processes 22 (2007) 297-312
28. Zwaan R.A. The immersed experience: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In: Ross B.H. (Ed). The psychology of language and motivation Vol. 44 (2004), Academic Press, New York
29. Zwaan R.A. Experiential traces and mental simulations in language comprehension. In: DeVega M., Glenberg A.M., and Graesser A.C. (Eds). Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (2008), Oxford University Press, Oxford 165-180
30. Zwaan R.A., and Yaxley R.H. Spatial iconicity affects semantic-relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10 (2003) 954-958