Grasping the meaning of words

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 154, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 103-108

  Glover, Scott ^a,c   Rosenbaum, David A ^a   Graham, Jeremy ^a   Dixon, Peter ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Affordances; Control; Grasping; Implicit; Language; Planning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAND GRIP; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; SPEECH; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 1642538204     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1659-2     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arbib MA (1997) From visual affordances in monkey parietal cortex to hippocampo-parietal interactions underlying rat navigation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 29:1429-1436
2. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G, Freund H-J (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13:400-404
3. Buchanan L, McEwen S, Westbury C, Libben G (2003) Semantics and semantic errors: implicit access to semantic information from words and nonwords in deep dyslexia. Brain Lang 84:65-83
4. Castiello U (1996) Grasping a fruit: selection for action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 22:582-603
5. Castiello U (1998) Attentional coding for three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional shapes. Differential interference effects. Exp Brain Res 123:289-297
6. Damasio H, Damasio A (1989) Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. Deiber M-P, Ibanez V, Sadato N, Hallett M (1996) Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurophys 75:233-247
8. Dixon P (1998) Why scientists value p values. Psychonom Bull Rev 5:390-396
9. Dixon P, O'Reilly T (1999) Scientific versus statistical inference. Can J Exp Psychol 53:133-149
10. Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR, Bulthoff HH, Fahle M (2000) Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol Sci 11:20-25
11. Gentilucci M (2002) Object motor representation and language. Neuropsychologia 40:1139-1153
12. Gentilucci M, Gangitano M (1998) Influence of automatic word reading on motor control. Eur J Neurosci 10:752-756
13. Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Bertolani L, Daprati E, Gangitano M (2000) Language and motor control. Exp Brain Res 133:468-490
14. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA
15. Glover S (2002) Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends Cogn Sci 6:288-292
16. Glover S (in press) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of actions. Behav Brain Sci
17. Glover S (2003) Optic ataxia as a deficit specific to the on-line control of actions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:447-456
18. Glover S, Dixon P (2001a) Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 27:560-572
19. Glover S, Dixon P (2001b) Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Exp Brain Res 137:254-258
20. Glover S, Dixon P (2002a) Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 146:383-387
21. Glover S, Dixon P (2002b) Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action. Percept Psychophys 64:266-278
22. Goodman SN, Royall R (1988) Evidence and scientific research. Am J Public Health 78:1568-1574
23. Grafton ST, Fagg A, Arbib MA (1998) Dorsal premotor cortex and conditional movement selection: a PET functional mapping study. J Neurophys 79:1092-1097
24. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ (2000) One more cup of coffee for the road: object-action assemblies, response blocking and response capture after frontal lobe damage. Exp Brain Res 133:81-93
25. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199-208
26. Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235-254
27. Jeannerod M (1994) The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 17:187-245
28. Kimura D (1979) Neuromotor mechanisms in the evolution of human communication. In: Steklis HD, Raleigh M (eds) Neurobiology of social communication in primates: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, New York
29. Kolb B, Whishaw IQ (1995) Fundamentals of human neuropsychology. Freeman, New York
30. Le S, Raufaste E, Roussel S, Puel M, Demonet JF (2003) Implicit face perception in a patient with visual agnosia? Evidence from behavioral and eye-tracking analyses. Neuropsychologia 41:702-712
31. Lhermitte F (1983) Utilization behaviour and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 106:237-255
32. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113
33. Petersen SE, Fox P, Posner M, Mintun M, Raichle M (1988) Positron emission tomography studies of the cortical anatomy of single word processing. Nature 331:585-589
34. Price CJ, Wise R, Watson J, Patterson K, Howard D, Frackowiak R (1994) Brain activity during reading: the effects of exposure duration and task. Brain 117:1255-1269
35. Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA (1998) Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci 21:188-194
36. Rosenbaum DA (1991) Human motor control. Academic Press, San Diego
37. Rushworth MF, Ellison A, Walsh V (2001) Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neurosci 4:643-662
38. Schendan HE, Searl MM, Melrose RJ, Stern CE (2003) An fMRI study of the role of the medial temporal lobe in implicit and explicit sequence learning. Neuron 27:1013-1025
39. Wing AM, Fraser C (1983) The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Q J Exp Psychol 35A:297-309
40. Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Motor Behav 18:245-260
41. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci Suppl 3:1212-1217