Priming of Reach and Grasp Actions by Handled Objects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1470-1484

  Masson, Michael E J ^a   Bub, Daniel N ^a   Breuer, Andreas T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action representations; Dorsal ventral stream interactions; Hand action representations; Motor affordances

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CUES; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 80053930884     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0023509     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bub D.N., Masson M.E.J. Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:341-358.
2. Buccino G., Vogt S., Ritzl A., Fink G.R., Zilles K., Freund H.-J., Rizzolatti G. Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron 2004, 42:323-334.
3. Cant J.S., Westwood D.A., Valyear K.F., Goodale M.A. No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:216-226.
4. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 2000, 12:478-484.
5. Cho, D. (T.), & Proctor, R. W. (in press) The object-based Simon effect: Grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
6. Cisek P. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2007, 362:1585-1599.
7. Cisek P., Crammond D.J., Kalaska J.F. Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89:922-942.
8. Cisek P., Kalaska J.F. Simultaneous encoding of multiple potential reach directions in dorsal premotor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 87:1149-1154.
9. Cohen N.R., Cross E.S., Tunik E., Grafton S.T., Culham J.C. Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: A TMS approach. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1553-1562.
10. Creem S.H., Proffitt D.R. Grasping objects by their handles: A necessary interaction between cognition and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:218-228.
11. Creem-Regehr S.H. Sensory-motor and cognitive functions of the human posterior parietal cortex involved in manual actions. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 2009, 91:166-171.
12. Dijkerman H.C., McIntosh R.D., Schindler I., Nijboer T.C.W., Milner A.D. Choosing between alternative wrist postures: Action planning needs perception. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1476-1482.
13. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1737-1747.
14. Ellis R., Tucker M., Symes E., Vainio L. Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:670-691.
15. Garofeanu C., Króliczak G., Goodale M.A., Humphrey G.K. Naming and grasping common objects: A priming study. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 159:55-64.
16. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1986, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
17. Girardi G., Lindemann O., Bekkering H. Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:330-340.
18. Goodale M.A., Cant J.S., Króliczak G. Grasping the past and present: When does visuomotor priming occur?. The first half second: The microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. H. Ögmen, B.G. Breitmeyer (Eds.).
19. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience 1992, 15:20-25.
20. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Sight unseen: An exploration of conscious and unconscious vision 2004, Oxford University Press, New York.
21. Grafton S.T. The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: Recent developments. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204:475-491.
22. Handy T.C., Grafton S.T., Shroff N.M., Ketay S., Gazzaniga M.S. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:421-427.
23. Herwig A., Massen C. Action planning with two-handed tools. Psychological Research 2009, 73:727-740.
24. Hommel B. Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research 1993, 55:270-279.
25. Jax S.A., Rosenbaum D.A. Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1573-1577.
26. Jeffreys H. Theory of probability 1961, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Johnson-Frey S.H. Cortical representations of human tool use. Taking action: Cognitive neuroscience perspectives on intentional acts 2003, 185-217. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S.H. Johnson-Frey (Ed.).
28. Kellenbach M.L., Brett M., Patterson K. Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:30-46.
29. Kiesel A., Hoffmann J. Variable action effects: Response control by context-specific effect anticipations. Psychological Research 2004, 68:155-162.
30. Króliczak G., McAdam T.D., Quinlan D.J., Culham J.C. The human dorsal stream adapts to real actions and 3D shape processing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 100:2627-2639.
31. Kühn S., Seurinck R., Fias W., Waszak F. The internal anticipation of sensory action effects: When action induces FFA and PPA activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4:54. 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00054.
32. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:476-490.
33. Martin A., Chao L.L. Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2001, 11:194-201.
34. Massen C., Prinz W. Programming tool-use actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:692-704.
35. Masson M.E.J., Loftus G.R. Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 57:203-220.
36. McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of the Graphics Interface 2000 Conference, 179-186.
37. Millikan R. Language and other abstract objects 1984, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 2006, Oxford University Press, New York.
39. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:774-785.
40. Murray J.E. The role of attention in the shift from orientation-dependent to orientation-invariant identification of disoriented objects. Memory & Cognition 1995, 23:49-58.
41. Norman D.A. Affordances, constraints, and conceptual models. Interactions 1999, 6:38-42.
42. Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (in press) Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: The effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
43. Phillips J.C., Ward R. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:540-558.
44. Raftery A.E. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology 1995, 25:111-163.
45. Riddoch M.J., Edwards M.G., Humphreys G.W., West R., Heafield T. Visual affordances direct action: Neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1998, 15:645-683.
46. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., Edwards S., Baker T., Willson K. Seeing the action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:82-89.
47. Rosenbaum D.A., Cohen R.G., Meulenbroek R.G., Vaughn J. Plans for grasping objects. Motor control and learning over the lifespan 2006, 9-25. Springer, New York. M. Latash, F. Lestienne (Eds.).
48. Rosenbaum D.A., Marchak F., Barnes H.J., Vaughan J., Slotta J., Jorgensen M. Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. Attention and performance XIII 1990, 321-342. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Jeannerod (Ed.).
49. Shen L., Alexander G.E. Preferential representation of instructed target location versus limb trajectory in dorsal premotor area. Journal of Neurophysiology 1997, 77:1195-1212.
50. Shmuelof L., Zohary E. Dissociation between ventral and dorsal fMRI activation during object and action recognition. Neuron 2005, 47:457-470.
51. Symes E., Ellis R., Tucker M. Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition 2005, 12:1337-1361.
52. Symes E., Ellis R., Tucker M. Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psychologica 2007, 124:238-255.
53. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
54. Tucker M., Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition 2001, 8:769-800.
55. Turner P. Affordance as context. Interacting with Computers 2005, 17:787-800.
56. Ulrich R., Miller J. Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123:34-80.
57. Vainio L., Ellis R., Tucker M. The role of visual attention in action priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:241-261.
58. Valyear K.F., Culham J.C., Sharif N., Westwood D., Goodale M.A. A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:218-228.
59. Wagenmakers E.-J. A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:779-804.
60. Wise S.P., Murray E.A. Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions. Trends in Neuroscience 2000, 23:271-276.