Grounding language in action

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 558-565

  Glenberg, Arthur M ^a   Kaschak, Michael P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; REACTION TIME;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0036730718     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196313     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BARSALOU, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbols systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
2. BURGESS, C., & LUND, K. (1997). Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12, 177-210.
3. CHOMSKY, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. FILLMORE, C. J., KAY, P., & O'CONNOR, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501-538.
5. FINCHER-KIEFER, R. (2001). Perceptual components of situation models. Memory & Cognition, 29, 336-343.
6. FODOR, J. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. GLENBERG, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
9. GLENBERG, A. M., & ROBERTSON, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1-26.
10. GLENBERG, A. M., & ROBERTSON, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 379-401.
11. GOLDBERG, A. E. (1995). A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. HARNAD, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335-346.
13. KASCHAK, M. P., & GLENBERG, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 508-529.
14. KAY, P., & FILLMORE, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction. Language, 75, 1-33.
15. KEENAN, J. M., BAILLET, S. D., & BROWN, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 115-126.
16. KINTSCH, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
17. LAKOFF, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. MCNEILL, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. MELTZOFF, A. N., & MOORE, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development & Parenting, 6, 179-192.
20. MICHAELIS, L., & LAMBRECHT, K. (1996). Toward a construction-based model of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72, 215-247.
21. NOVICK, L. R., & CHENG, P. W. (in press). Assessing interactive causal influence. Psychological Review.
22. OCHS, E., GONZALES, P., & JACOBY, S. (1996). "When I come down I'm in the domain state": Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 328-369). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. O'REGAN, J. K., & NOE, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 939-1031.
24. PIAGET, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
25. PINKER, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: HarperCollins.
26. ROTH, W.-M. (1999). Discourse and agency in school science laboratories. Discourse Processes, 28, 27-60.
27. SEARLE, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 3, 417-424.
28. SINGER, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479-517). San Diego: Academic Press.
29. STANFIELD, R. A., & ZWAAN, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153-156.
30. TALMY, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49-100.
31. TOMASELLO, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209-253.
32. TUCKER, M., & ELLIS, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 830-846.
33. VAN DEN BROEK, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539-589). San Diego: Academic Press.