Repetition blindness reveals differences between the representations of manipulable and nonmanipulable objects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1228-1241

  Harris, Irina M ^a   Murray, Alexandra M ^a   Hayward, William G ^b   O'Callaghan, Claire ^a   Andrews, Sally ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Action; Manipulable objects; Object recognition; Repetition blindness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPETITION PRIMING; TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPETITION PRIMING; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874402617     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0029035     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Almeida, J., Knobel, M., Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2007). The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming: When recognizing is not enough. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1177-1182. doi:10.3758/BF03193109
2. Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychological Science, 21, 772-778. doi:10.1177/0956797610371343
3. Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 15214-15218. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805867105
4. Armstrong, I. T., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1995). Repetition deficit in RSVP displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1044-1052. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.5.1044
5. Arnell, K. M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1997). Repetition blindness for pseudo-object pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 999-1013. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.999
6. Bar, M., Tootell, R. B. H., Schacter, D. L., Greve, D. N., Fischl, B. R., Mendola, J. D.,Dale, A. M. (2001). Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit object recognition. Neuron, 29, 529-535. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00224-0
7. Barry, C., Hirsh, K. W., Johnston, R. A., & Williams, C. L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 350-375. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2743
8. Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50(A), 560-585. doi:10.1080/783663595
9. Bartram, D. J. (1976). Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition, 4, 593-602. doi:10.3758/BF03213223
10. Bavelier, D., Prasada, S., & Segui, J. (1994). Repetition blindness between words: Nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1437-1455. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1437
11. Bond, R., & Andrews, S. (2008). Repetition blindness in sentence contexts: Not just an attribution? Memory & Cognition, 36, 295-313. doi:10.3758/MC.36.2.295
12. Buxbaum, L. J., & Saffran, E. M. (2002). Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and non-apraxic subjects. Brain and Language, 82, 179-199. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00014-7
13. Chainay, H., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Privileged access to action for objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 348-355. doi:10.3758/BF03196292
14. Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913-919. doi:10.1038/13217
15. Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478-484. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0635
16. Chouinard, P. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2010). Category-specific neural processing for naming pictures of animals and naming pictures of tools: An ALE meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 48, 409-418. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.032
17. Coltheart, V., Mondy, S., & Coltheart, M. (2005). Repetition blindness for novel objects. Visual Cognition, 12, 519-540. doi:10.1080/13506280444000427
18. Corballis, M. C., & Armstrong, C. (2007). Repetition blindness is orien-tation blind. Memory & Cognition, 35, 372-380. doi:10.3758/BF03193458
19. Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1380-1385. doi:10.1038/nn1537
20. Glaser, W. (1992). Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61-105. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90040-O
21. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8
22. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14-23. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
23. Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2004). The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 649-677. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro .27.070203.144220
24. Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (2004). Repetition blindness occurs innonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 305-318. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.305
25. Harris, I. M., & Dux, P. E. (2005a). Orientation-invariant object recogni-tion: Evidence from repetition blindness. Cognition, 95, 73-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.006
26. Harris, I. M., & Dux, P. E. (2005b). Turning objects on their head: The influence of the stored axis on object individuation. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1010-1015. doi:10.3758/BF03193627
27. Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 21, 191-201. doi:10.1002/hbm.10157
28. Hayward, W. G., Zhou, G., Man, W.-F., & Harris, I. M. (2010). Repetition blindness for rotated objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Hu-man Perception and Performance, 36, 57-73. doi:10.1037/a0017447
29. Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2006). The role of action represen-tations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 221-228. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0443-5
30. Hodges, J. R., Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., & Spatt, J. (2000). The role of conceptual knowledge in object use. Evidence from semantic dementia. Brain, 123, 1913-1925. doi:10.1093/brain/123.9.1913
31. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303. doi:10.3758/BF03202498
32. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90016-3
33. Kanwisher, N. (2001). Neural events and perceptual awareness. Cognition, 79, 89-113.
34. Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.30
35. Kanwisher, N., Yin, C., & Wojciulik, E. (1999). Repetition blindness for pictures: Evidence for the rapid computation of abstract visual descriptions. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 119-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M., & Patterson, K. (2003). Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 30-46. doi: 10.1162/089892903321107800
37. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490. doi:10.3758/BF03210951
38. Luo, C. R., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Repetition blindness under minimum memory load: Effects of spatial and temporal proximity and the encoding effectiveness of the first item. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1053-1064. doi:10.3758/BF03205464
39. Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 27-51. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163532
40. Mahon, B. Z., Milleville, S. C., Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R. I., Caramazza, A., & Martin, A. (2007). Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron, 55, 507-520. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.011
41. Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. B., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A.,Tootell, R. B. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92, 8135-8139. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.18.8135
42. McNair, N. A., & Harris, I. M. (in press). Disentangling the contributions of grasp and action representations in the recognition of manipulable objects. Experimental Brain Research.
43. Milner, A. D., Perrett, D. I., Johnston, R. S., Benson, P. J., Jordan, T. R., Heeley, D. W.,Davidson, D. L. W. (1991). Perception and action in "visual form agnosia." Brain, 114, 405-428. doi:10.1093/brain/114.1.405
44. Morris, A. L., & Still, M. L. (2008). Now you see it, now you don't: Repetition blindness for nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychol-ogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 146-166. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.146
45. Morris, A. L., Still, M. L., & Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2009). Repetition blindness: An emergent property of inter-item competition. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 338-375. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.001
46. Negri, G. A. L., Lunardelli, A., Gigli, G. L., & Rumiati, R. I. (2007). Degraded semantic knowledge and accurate object use. Cortex, 43, 376-388. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70463-5
47. Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R. I., Zadini, A., Ukmar, M., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2007). What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 795-816. doi:10.1080/02643290701707412
48. Ochipa, C., Rothi, L. G. J., & Heilman, K. M. (1989). Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use. Annals of Neurology, 25, 190-193. doi:10.1002/ana.410250214
49. Patterson, K., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 333-360). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
50. Petit, L. S., Pegna, A. J., Harris, I. M., & Michel, C. M. (2006). Automatic motor cortex activation for natural as compared to awkward grips of a manipulable object. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 120-130. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0092-0
51. Potter, M. C., & Faulconer, B. A. (1975, February 6). Time to understand pictures and words. Nature, 253, 437-438. doi:10.1038/253437a0
52. Proverbio, A. M., Adorni, R., & D'Aniello, G. E. (2011). 250 ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2711-2717. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia .2011.05.019
53. Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R. (2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 884-892. doi:10.1162/0898929054021111
54. Remond, A., & Coltheart, V. (2008). Effects of repetition on comprehend-ing and remembering action pictures. OPAM 2007 Conference Ab-stracts. Visual Cognition, 16, 90-143.
55. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual object processing in a case of optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 131-185. doi:10.1080/02643298708252038
56. Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205-235. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205
57. Rueschemeyer, S.-A., van Rooij, D., Lindemann, O., Willems, R. M., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The function of words: Distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1844-1851. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21310
58. Rumiati, R. I., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Recognition by action: Dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 631-647. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.631
59. Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R., & Poncet, M. (1991). The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. Brain, 114, 2555-2573. doi:10.1093/brain/114.6.2555
60. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
61. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (2005). Repetition blindness in rapid lists: Activation and inhibition versus construction and attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 54-67. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.54
62. Witt, J. K., Kemmerer, D., Linkenauger, S. A., & Culham, J. C. (2010). A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools. Psychological Science, 21, 1215-1219. doi:10.1177/0956797610378307
63. Yoon, E. Y., Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Modelling direct perceptual constraints on action selection: The Naming and Action Model (NAM). Visual Cognition, 9, 615-661. doi:10.1080/13506280143000601