The representation of knowledge in minds and machines

International Journal of Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 411-420

  Kintsch, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032219859     PISSN: 00207594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002075998400169     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barclay, J.R., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J., McCarrell, N.S., & Nitsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 13, 471-481.
2. Barsalou, L.W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A.C. Collins, S.E. Gathercole, M.A. Conway, & P.E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29-101). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
3. Collins, A.M., & Quillian, M.R. (1969). Retrieval from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
4. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391-407.
5. Ericsson, K.A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
6. Estes, W.K. (1995). A general theory of classification and memory applied to discourse processing. In W.A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C.R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension (pp. 35-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
7. Foltz, P.W. (1996). Latent Semantic Indexing for text-based research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 197-202.
8. Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookian, H.D. (1982). On understanding literal speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 85-98.
9. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
10. Kintsch, W. (1989). The representation of knowledge and the use of knowledge in discourse comprehension. In R. Dietrich & C.F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 185-209). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kintsch, W., & Welsch, D.M. (1991). The construction-integration model: A framework for studying memory for text. In W.E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennett B. Murdock (pp. 367-385). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
13. Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
14. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
15. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1988). Contextually relevant aspects of meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 331-343.
16. Wolfe, M.B., Schreiner, M.E., Rehder, R., Laham, D., Foltz, P.W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T.K. (1998). Learning from text: Matching reader and text by Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 309-336.