fMRI repetition suppression for familiar but not arbitrary actions with tools

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 4247-4259

  Valyear, Kenneth F ^a   Gallivan, Jason P ^b   Adam McLean, D ^c   Culham, Jody C ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Centre for Brain and Mind   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOOL USE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858383448     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5270-11.2012     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Andersen RA, Buneo CA (2002) Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:189-220.
2. Baumann MA, Fluet MC, Scherberger H (2009) Context-specific grasp movement representation in the macaque anterior intraparietal area. J Neurosci 29:6436-6448.
3. Begliomini C, Caria A, Grodd W, Castiello U (2007a) Comparing natural and constrained movements: new insights into the visuomotor control of grasping. PLoS One 2:e1108.
4. Begliomini C, Wall MB, Smith AT, Castiello U (2007b) Differential cortical activity for precision and whole-hand visually guided grasping in humans. Eur J Neurosci 25:1245-1252.
5. Binkofski F, Dohle C, Posse S, Stephan KM, Hefter H, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ (1998) Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology 50:1253-1259.
6. Bohlhalter S, Hattori N, Wheaton L, Fridman E, Shamim EA, Garraux G, Hallett M (2009) Gesture subtype-dependent left lateralization ofpraxis planning: an event-related fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 19:1256-1262.
7. Bonini L, Rozzi S, Serventi FU, Simone L, Ferrari PF, Fogassi L (2010) Ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices make distinct contribution to action organization and intention understanding. Cereb Cortex 20:1372-1385.
8. Bub DN, Masson ME, Bukach CM (2003) Gesturing and naming: the use of functional knowledge in object identification. Psychol Sci 14:467-472.
9. Bub DN, Masson ME, Cree GS (2008) Evocationoffunctional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition 106:27-58.
10. Buxbaum LJ (2001) Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action. Neurocase 7:445-458.
11. Buxbaum LJ, Schwartz MF, Carew TG (1997) The role of semantic memory in object use. Cogn Neuropsychol 14:219-254.
12. Buxbaum LJ, Johnson-Frey SH, Bartlett-Williams M (2005) Deficient internal models for planning hand-object interactions in apraxia. Neuropsy-chologia 43:917-929.
13. Carey DP, Harvey M, Milner AD (1996) Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia 34:329-337.
14. Cavina-Pratesi C, Goodale MA, Culham JC (2007) FMRI reveals a dissociation between grasping and perceiving the size of real 3D objects. PLoS One 2:e424.
15. Cavina-Pratesi C, Monaco S, Fattori P, Galletti C, McAdam TD, Quinlan DJ, Goodale MA, Culham JC (2010) Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals the neural substrates of arm transport and grip formation in reach-to-grasp actions in humans. J Neurosci 30:10306-10323.
16. Chao LL, Martin A (2000) Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12:478-484.
17. Chouinard PA, Goodale MA (2009) FMRI adaptation during performance of learned arbitrary visuomotor conditional associations. Neuroimage 48:696-706.
18. Cisek P, Kalaska JF (2010) Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu Rev Neurosci 33:269-298.
19. Creem SH, Proffitt DR (2001) Grasping objects bytheir handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:218-228.
20. Culham JC (2004) Human brain imaging reveals a parietal area specialized for grasping. In: Attention and performance XX: functional brain imaging of human cognition (Kanwisher N, Duncan J, eds). Oxford, UK: Oxford UP.
21. Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JF, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2003) Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 153:180-189.
22. Dinstein I, Hasson U, Rubin N, Heeger DJ (2007) Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. J Neurophysiol 98:1415-1427.
23. Fagg AH, Arbib MA (1998) Modeling parietal-premotor interactionsin primate control of grasping. Neural Netw 11:1277-1303.
24. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G (2005) Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308:662-667.
25. Frey SH, Vinton D, Norlund R, Grafton ST (2005) Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 23:397-405.
26. Fridman EA, Immisch I, Hanakawa T, Bohlhalter S, Waldvogel D, Kansaku K, Wheaton L, Wu T, Hallett M (2006) The role of the dorsal stream for gesture production. Neuroimage 29:417-428.
27. Gallivan JP, McLean DA, Valyear KF, Pettypiece CE, Culham JC (2011) Decoding action intentions from preparatory brain activity in human parieto-frontal networks. J Neurosci 31:9599-9610.
28. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
29. Goldenberg G, Spatt J (2009) The neural basis of tool use. Brain 132:1645-1655.
30. Grèzes J, Tucker M, Armony J, Ellis R, Passingham RE (2003) Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur J Neurosci 17:2735-2740.
31. Grill-Spector K, Malach R (2001) fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol (Amst) 107:293-321.
32. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A (2006) Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci 10:14-23.
33. Haaland KY, Harrington DL, Knight RT (2000) Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain 123:2306-2313.
34. Hamilton AF, Grafton ST (2009) Repetition suppression for performed hand gestures revealed by fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 30:2898-2906.
35. Handy TC, Grafton ST, Shroff NM, Ketay S, Gazzaniga MS (2003) Grasp-able objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nat Neurosci 6:421-427.
36. Heilman KM, Rothi LJ, Valenstein E (1982) Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology 32:342-346.
37. Hodges JR, Spatt J, Patterson K (1999) "What" and "how": evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:9444-9448.
38. Hodges JR, Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K, Spatt J (2000) The role of conceptual knowledge in object use evidence from semantic dementia. Brain 123:1913-1925.
39. Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H (1995) Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci 18:314-320.
40. Johnson-Frey SH (2004) The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends Cogn Sci 8:71-78.
41. Johnson-Frey SH, Newman-Norlund R, Grafton ST (2005) A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning ofeveryday tool use skills. Cereb Cortex 15:681-695.
42. Kriegeskorte N, Simmons WK, Bellgowan PS, Baker CI (2009) Circular analysisinsystems neuroscience: the dangersofdouble dipping. Nat Neu-rosci 12:535-540.
43. Króliczak G, Frey SH (2009) A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level. Cereb Cortex 19:2396-2410.
44. Króliczak G, Cavina-Pratesi C, Goodman DA, Culham JC (2007) What does the brain do when you fake it? An FMRI study of pantomimed and real grasping. J Neurophysiol 97:2410-2422.
45. Króliczak G, McAdam TD, Quinlan DJ, Culham JC (2008) The human dorsal stream adapts to real actions and 3D shape processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurophysiol 100:2627-2639.
46. Lauro-Grotto R, Piccini C, Shallice T (1997) Modality-specific operations in semantic dementia. Cortex 33:593-622.
47. Lewis JW (2006) Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuro-scientist 12:211-231.
48. Logothetis NK, Wandell BA (2004) Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annu Rev Physiol 66:735-769.
49. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A (2001) Neuro-physiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412:150-157.
50. Mahon BZ, Milleville SC, Negri GA, Rumiati RI, Caramazza A, Martin A (2007) Action-related properties shape object representationsinthe ventral stream. Neuron 55:507-520.
51. Masson ME, Bub DN, Breuer AT (2011) Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:1470-1484.
52. McGrenere J, Ho W (2000) Affordances: clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000 Conference, Montre ́al, Que ́bec, Canada, May 15-17.
53. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford UP.
54. Mohr HM, Goebel R, Linden DE (2006) Content- and task-specific dissociations of frontal activity during maintenance and manipulation in visual working memory. J Neurosci 26:4465-4471.
55. Norman DA (1999) Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions 6:38-42.
56. Pilgrim E, Humphreys GW (1991) Impairment of action to visual objects in a case of ideomotor apraxia. Cogn Neuropsychol 8:459-473.
57. Raos V, Umiltá MA, Gallese V, Fogassi L (2004) Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the dorsal premotor area F2 of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 92:1990-2002.
58. Raos V, Umiltá MA, Murata A, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2006) Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 95:709-729.
59. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Coltheart M, Funnell E (1988) Semantic systems or system? Neuropsychological evidence reexamined. Cogn Neuro-psychol 5:3-25.
60. Riddoch MJ, Edwards MG, Humphreys GW, West R, Heafield T (1998) Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. Cogn Neuropsychol 15:645-683.
61. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169-192.
62. Rizzolatti G, Riggio L, Dascola I, Umiltá C (1987) Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a pre-motor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25:31-40.
63. Rothi LJG, Heilman KM (1997) Apraxia: the neuropsychology of action. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
64. Rothi LJ, Ochipa C, Heilman KM (1997) A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis and apraxia. In: Apraxia: the neuropsychology of action (Rothi LJG, Heilman KM, eds). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
65. Rumiati RI, Humphreys GW (1998) Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:631-647.
66. Rumiati RI, Weiss PH, Shallice T, Ottoboni G, Noth J, Zilles K, Fink GR (2004) Neural basisofpantomiming the useofvisually presented objects. Neuroimage 21:1224-1231.
67. Sirigu A, Duhamel JR, Poncet M (1991) The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. Brain 114:2555-2573.
68. Stark A, Zohary E (2008) Parietal mapping of visuomotor transformations during human tool grasping. Cereb Cortex 18:2358-2368.
69. Taira M, Mine S, Georgopoulos AP, Murata A, Sakata H (1990) Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement. Exp Brain Res 83:29-36.
70. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
71. Tolias AS, Smirnakis SM, Augath MA, Trinath T, Logothetis NK (2001) Motion processing in the macaque: revisited with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 21:8594-8601.
72. Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:830-846.
73. Umilta MA, Brochier T, Spinks RL, Lemon RN (2007) Simultaneous recording of macaque premotor and primary motor cortex neuronal populations reveals different functional contributions to visuomotor grasp. J Neurophysiol 98:488-501.
74. Umiltà MA, Escola L, Intskirveli I, Grammont F, Rochat M, Caruana F, Jez-zini A, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (2008) When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:2209-2213.
75. Valyear KF, Culham JC (2010) Observing learned object-specific functional grasps preferentially activates the ventral stream. J Cogn Neurosci 22:970-984.
76. Valyear KF, Cavina-Pratesi C, Stiglick AJ, Culham JC (2007) Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp? Neuroimage 36 [Suppl 2]:T94-T108.
77. Valyear KF, Chapman CS, Gallivan JP, Mark RS, Culham JC (2011) To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools. Exp Brain Res 212:125-142.
78. Yee LT, Roe K, Courtney SM (2010) Selective involvement ofsuperior frontal cortex during working memory for shapes. J Neurophysiol 103:557-563.