Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control

Neural Networks

Volumn 11, Issue 7-8, 1998, Pages 1317-1329

  Wolpert, D M ^a   Kawato, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contextual prediction; Internal models; Modularity; Motor control; Motor learning

Indexed keywords

CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MUSCLE;

MOTOR BEHAVIOR; MOTOR LEARNING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

LEARNING; MODEL; MODULATION; MOTOR CONTROL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0032192424     PISSN: 08936080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baker J.F., Perlmutter S.I., Peterson B.W., Rude S.A., Robinson F.R. Simultaneous opposing adaptive changes in cat vestibulo-ocular reflex directions for two body orientations. Exp. Brain Res. 69:1987;220-224.
2. Brashers-Krug T., Shadmehr R., Bizzi E. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature. 382:1996;252-255.
3. Cacciatore, T.W., & Nowlan, S.J. (1994). Mixtures of controllers for jump linear and non-linear plants. In J.D. Cowan, G. Tesauro, & J. Alspector (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 6 (pp. 719-726). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
4. Decety J., Sjoholm H., Ryding E., Sternberg G., Ingvar D.H. The cerebellum participates in mental activity. Brain Res. 553:1990;313-317.
5. Dempster A.P., Laird N. M., Rubin D. B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B. 39:1977;1-38.
6. Flanagan J.R., Wing A.M. The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. J. Neurosci. 17:1997;1519-1528.
7. Gandolfo F., Mussa-Ivaldi F.A., Bizzi E. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93:1996;3843-3846.
8. Ghahramani, Z., & Hinton, G. E. (1998). Switching state-space models (submitted).
9. Ghahramani Z., Wolpert D.M. Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature. 386:1997;392-395.
10. Gomi H., Kawato M. Recognition of manipulated objects by motor learning with modular architecture networks. Neural Networks. 6:1993;485-497.
11. Graybiel A.M., Aosaki T., Flaherty A.W., Kimura M. The basal ganglia and adaptive motor control. Science. 265(5180):1994;1826-1831.
12. Hay J.C., Pick H.L. Gaze-contingent prism adaptation: Optical and motor factors. J. Exp. Psychol. 72:1966;640-648.
13. Imamizu H., Miyauchi S., Sasaki Y., Takino R., Pütz B., Kawato M. Separated modules for visuomotor control and learning in the cerebellum: a functional MRI study. NeuroImage. 5:1997;S598.
14. Ito M. Neurophysiological aspects of the cerebellar motor control system. Int. J. Neurol. 7:1970;162-176.
15. Ito, M. (1984). The cerebellum and neural control. New York: Raven Press.
16. Jacobs R.A., Jordan M.I., Barto A.G. Task decomposition through competition in a modular connectionist architecture: The what and where vision tasks. Cognitive Science. 15(2):1991;219-250.
17. Jacobs R.A., Jordan M.I., Nowlan S.J., Hinton G.E. Adaptive mixture of local experts. Neural Computation. 3:1991;79-87.
18. Johansson R.S., Westling G. Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic-control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp. Brain Res. 56:1984;550-564.
19. Jordan, M.I. (1995). Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In H. Heuer, & S. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action: Motor skills. New York: Academic Press.
20. Jordan, M.I., & Jacobs, R.A. (1992). Hierarchies of adaptive experts. In J. Moody, S. Hanson, & R. Lippmann (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing (pp. 985-993). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
21. Jordan M.I., Jacobs R.A. Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the EM algorithm. Neural Computation. 6:1994;181-214.
22. Jordan M.I., Rumelhart D.E. Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science. 16:1992;307-354.
23. Kawato, M. (1990). Feedback-error-learning neural network for supervised learning. In R. Eckmiller (Ed.), Advanced neural computers (pp. 365-372). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24. Kawato M., Furawaka K., Suzuki R. A hierarchical neural network model for the control and learning of voluntary movements. Biol. Cybern. 56:1987;1-17.
25. Kawato M., Gomi H. The cerebellum and VOR/OKR learning models. Trends Neurosci. 15:1992;445-453.
26. Kawato M., Gomi H. Theories of motor learning by the cerebellum - reply. Trends Neurosci. 5:1993;177-178.
27. Kohler, I. (1950). Development and alterations of the perceptual world: conditioned sensations. Proceedings of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, p. 227.
28. Kravitz J.H. Conditioned adaptation to prismatic displacement. Perception and Psychophysics. 11:1972;38-42.
29. Kravitz J.H., Yaffe F. Conditioned adaptation to prismatic displacement with a tone as the conditional stimulus. Perception and Psychophysics. 12:1972;305-308.
30. Kuperstein M. Neural model of adaptive hand-eye coordination for single postures. Science. 239:1988;1308-1311.
31. Martin T.A., Keating J.G., Goodkin H.P., Bastian A.J., Thach W.T. Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze throw calibrations. Brain. 119:1996;1199-1211.
32. McGonigle B.O., Flook J.P. Long-term retention of single and multistate prismatic adaptation by humans. Nature. 272:1978;364-366.
33. Miall R.C., Weir D.J., Wolpert D.M., Stein J.F. Is the cerebellum a Smith predictor? J. Motor Behav. 25(3):1993;203-216.
34. Miall R.C., Wolpert D.M. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks. 9(8):1996;1265-1279.
35. Miller W.T. Sensor-based control of robotic manipulators using a general learning algorithm. IEEE J. Robotics and Automation. 3:1987;157-165.
36. Narendra K.S., Balakrishnan J. Adaptive control using multiple models. IEEE Trans Automatic Control. 42(2):1997;171-187.
37. Narendra K.S., Balakrishnan J., Ciliz M.K. Adaptation and learning using multiple models, switching, and tuning. IEEE Control Systems Magazine. 15(3):1995;37-51.
38. Pawelzik K., Kohlmorgen J., Müller K.-R. Annealed competition of experts for a segmentation and classification of switching dynamics. Neural Computation. 8:1996;340-356.
39. Shadmehr R., Mussa-Ivaldi F. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14(5):1994;3208-3224.
40. Shelhamer, M., Robinson, D.A., & Tan, H.S. (1991). Context-specific gain switching in the human vestibuloocular reflex. In B. Cohen, D.L. Tomko, & F. Guedry (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 656, pp. 889-891). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
41. Sutton R.S., Barto A.G. Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. Psychol. Rev. 88:1981;135-170.
42. Welch R.B. Discriminative conditioning of prism adaptation. Perception and Psychophysics. 10:1971;90-92.
43. Welch, R.B. (1986). Adaptation of space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1:24). New York: Wiley.
44. Welch R.B., Bridgeman B., Anand S., Browman K.E. Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement. Perception and Psychophysics. 54(2):1993;195-204.
45. Wolpert D.M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1(6):1997;209-216.
46. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp. Brain Res. 103(3):1995;460-470.
47. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science. 269:1995;1880-1882.
48. Wolpert, D.M., Miall, R.C., & Kawato, M. (1998). Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci.