Are abstract action words embodied? an fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue MAR, 2013, Pages

  Sakreida, Katrin ^a   Scorolli, Claudia ^b   Menz, Mareike M ^c   Heim, Stefan ^a,d,e   Borghi, Anna M ^b,f   Binkofski, Ferdinand ^a,e,g  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^d RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^f INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

^g JARA TRANSLATIONAL BRAIN MEDICINE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abstract; Concrete; FMRI; Language comprehension; Sensorimotor cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRONTAL GYRUS; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL ACUITY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84933677174     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00125     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Annett, M. (1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br. J. Psychol. 61(3), 303-321.
2. Arévalo, A. L., Baldo, J. V., and Dronkers, N. F. (2012). What do brain lesions tell us about theories of embodied semantics and the human mirror neuron system? Cortex 48(2), 242-254.
3. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., and Gulikers, L.(1996). CELEX2. Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia, PA.
4. Badre, D. (2008). Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro-caudal organization of the frontal lobes. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12(5), 193-200.
5. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617-645.
6. Barsalou, L. W., and Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts, in Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking, eds. D. Pecher, and R. A. Zwaan (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 129-163.
7. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Kyle Simmons, W., and Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulations in conceptual processing, in Symbols, Embodiment and Meaning, eds. M. de Vega, A. M. Glenberg, and A. C. Graesser (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 245-283.
8. Bedny, M., and Caramazza, A. (2011). Perception, action, and word meanings in the human brain: the case from action verbs. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1224, 81-95.
9. Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernam, K. A., Possing, E. T., and Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17(6), 905-917.
10. Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Posse, S., Seitz, R. J., Rizzolatti, G., and Freund, H. J. (1999). A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI-study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11(9), 3276-3286.
11. Bohrn, I.C., Altmann, U., and Jacobs, A.M. (2012a). Looking at the brains behind figurative language - a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia 50(11), 2669-2683.
12. Bohrn, I.C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., and Jacobs, A.M. (2012b). Old proverbs in new skins - an fMRI study on defamiliarization. Front. Psychol. 3, 204.
13. Borghi, A. M., and Cimatti, F. (2009). Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings, in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds. N. Taatgen, and H. van Rijn (Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society), 2304-2309.
14. Borghi, A. M., and Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia 48(3), 763-773.
15. Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D., and Scorolli, C. (2011). Manipulating objects and telling words: a study on concrete and abstract words acquisition. Front. Psychol. 2, 15.
16. Botvinick, M. M. (2008). Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12(5), 201-208.
17. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R. J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., and Freund, H. J.(2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13(2), 400-404.
18. Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Lang. Cogn. 2(1), 79-116.
19. Chiarello, C., Senehi, J., and Nuding, S. (1987). Semantic priming with abstract and concrete words: differential asymmetry may be postlexical. Brain Lang. 31(1), 43-60.
20. Christoff, K., Keramatian, K., Gordon, A. M., Smith, R., and Mädler, B. (2009). Prefrontal organization of cognitive control according to levels of abstraction. Brain Res. 1286, 94-105.
21. Clark, A. (1999). Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition, in A Companion to Cognitive Science, eds. W. Betchel, and G. Graham (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), 506-517.
22. Day, J. (1979). Visual half-field word recognition as a function of syntactic class and imageability. Neuropsychologia 17(5), 515-519.
23. Deloche, G., Seron, X., Scius, G., and Segui, J.(1987). Right hemisphere language processing: lateral difference with imageable and nonimageable ambiguous words. Brain Lang. 30(2), 197-205.
24. Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., and Seidenberg, M. S. (2010). Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 20(2), 468-478.
25. Dove, G. (2009). Beyond conceptual symbols: a call for representational pluralism. Cognition 110(3), 412-431.
26. Eickhoff, S. B., Stephan, K. E., Mohlberg, H., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., Amunts, K., and Zilles, K. (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. NeuroImage 25(4), 1325-1335.
27. Fischer, M., and Zwaan, R. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61(6), 825-850.
28. Friederici, A. D., Opitz, B., and von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: an fMRI investigation of different word types. Cereb. Cortex 10(7), 698-705.
29. Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: the neural exploitation hypothesis. Soc. Neurosci. 3(3-4), 317-333.
30. Gentner, D. (2010). Psychology in cognitive science: 1978-2038. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2(3), 328-344.
31. Giora, R.(1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis. Cogn. Linguistics 8-3, 183-206.
32. Glenberg, A. M., and Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9(3), 558-565.
33. Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., and Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61(6), 905-919.
34. Goel, V., and Dolan, R. J. (2001). The functional anatomy of humor: segregating cognitive and affective components. Nat. Neurosci. 4(3), 237-238.
35. Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Price, C. J., Josephs, O., Vandeberghe, R., Cappa, S. F., Kapur, N., and Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1998). The neural systems sustaining face and proper name processing. Brain 121(Pt 11), 2103-2118.
36. Grossman, M., Koenig, P., DeVita, C., Glosser, G., Alsop, D., Detre, J., and Gee, J. (2002). The neural basis for category-specific knowledge: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 15(4), 936-948.
37. Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., and West, W. C. (1999). Dual-coding, context availability,and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiologic investigation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25(3), 721-742.
38. Jastorff, J., Clavagnier, S., Gergely, G., and Orban, G. A. (2011). Neural mechanisms of understanding rational actions: middle temporal gyrus activation by contextual violation. Cereb. Cortex 21(2), 318-329.
39. Jirak, D., Menz, M. M., Buccino, G., Borghi, A. M., and Binkofski, F. (2010). Grasping language - a short story on embodiment. Conscious. Cogn. 19(3), 711-720.
40. Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9(11), 512-518.
41. Kellenbach M. L., Wijers, A. A., Hovius, M., Mulder, J., and Mulder, G. (2002). Neural differentiation of lexico-syntactic categories or semantic features? Event-related potential evidence for both. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14(4), 561-577.
42. Kemmerer, D., Rudrauf, D., Manzel, K., and Tranel, D. (2012). Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions. Cortex 48(7), 826-848.
43. Kiehl, K. A., Liddle, P. F., Smith, A. M., Mendrek, A., Forster, B. B., and Hare, R. D. (1999). Neural pathways involved in the processing of concrete and abstract words. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7(4), 225-233.
44. Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., and Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 140(1), 14-34.
45. Kousta, S., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., and Andrews, M. (2009). Happiness is... an abstract word: the role of affect in abstract knowledge representation, in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds. N. Taatgen, and H. van Rijn (Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society).
46. Leveroni, C. L., Seidenberg, M., Mayer, A. R., Mead, L. A., Binder, J. R., and Rao, S. M. (2000). Neural systems underlying the recognition of familiar and newly learned faces. J. Neurosci. 20(2), 878-886.
47. Mahon, B. Z., and Caramazza, A.(2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J. Physiol. Paris 102(1-3), 59-70.
48. Maldjian, J. A., Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R. A., and Burdette, J. H. (2003). An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. NeuroImage 19(3), 1233-1239.
49. Mårtensson, F., Roll, M., Apt, P., and Horne, M. (2011). Modeling the meaning of words: neural correlates of abstract and concrete noun processing. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars.) 71(4), 455-478.
50. Martin, A., and Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11(2), 194-201.
51. Mellet, E., Tzourio, N., Denis, M., and Mazoyer, B. (1998). Cortical anatomy of mental imagery of concrete nouns based on their dictionary definition. NeuroReport 9(5), 803-808.
52. Moritz, C. H., Haughton, V. M., Cordes, D., Quigley, M., and Meyerand, M. E. (2000). Whole-brain functional MR imaging activation from a finger-tapping task examined with independent component analysis. AJNR. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21(9), 1629-1635.
53. Nittono, H., Suehiro, M., and Hori, T. (2002). Word imageability and N400 in an incidental memory paradigm. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 44(3), 219-229.
54. Nolfi, S., and Floreano, D. (2000). Evolutionary Robotics: The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-organizing Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Noppeney, U., and Price, C. J. (2004). Retrieval of abstract semantics. NeuroImage 22(1), 164-170.
56. Paivio, A.(1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
57. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58. Papeo, L., Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C., and Rumiati, R. I. (2011). She is not like I: the tie between language and action is in our imagination. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23(12), 3939-3948.
59. Papeo, L., Vallesi, A., Isaja, A., and Rumiati, R. I. (2009). Effects of TMS on different stages of motor and non-motor verb processing in the primary motor cortex. PLoS One 4(2), e4508.
60. Pecher, D., Boot, I., and Van Dantzig, S. (2011). Abstract concepts: sensorymotor grounding, metaphors, and beyond, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 54, ed. B. Ross (Burlington: Academic Press), 217-248.
61. Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Collina, S., Rosa, M. M., and Fazio, F. (1999). The neural correlates of verb and noun processing: a PET study. Brain 122(Pt 12), 2337-2344.
62. Price, C. J. (2010). The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1191, 62-88.
63. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6(7), 576-582.
64. Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., Gennari, S. P., Davies, R., and Cuetos, F. (2011). Neural correlates of abstract verb processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23(1), 106-118.
65. Rüschemeyer, S. A., Brass, M., and Friederici, A. D. (2007). Comprehending prehending: neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19(5), 855-865.
66. Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., and Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. NeuroImage 27(1), 188-200.
67. Scorolli, C., Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Nicoletti, R., Riggio, L., Borghi, A. M. (2011). Abstract and concrete sentences, embodiment, and language. Front. Psychol. 2, 227.
68. Scorolli, C., Jacquet, P. O., Binkofski, F., Nicoletti, R., Tessari, A., and Borghi, A. M. (2012). Abstract and concrete phrases processing differentially modulates cortico-spinal excitability. Brain Res. 1488, 60-71.
69. Semin, G. R., and Smith, E. R. (2008). Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
70. Sergent, J., Ohta, S., and MacDonald, B.(1992). Neuroanatomy of face and object processing. Brain 115(Pt 1), 15-36.
71. Smith, L. B. (2005). Cognition as a dynamic system: principles from embodiment. Dev. Rev. 25(3-4), 278-298.
72. Toni, I., de Lange, F. P., Noordzij, M. L., and Hagoort, P. (2008). Language beyond action. J. Physiol. Paris 102(1-3), 71-79.
73. Whitney, C., Kirk, M., O'Sullivan, J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., and Jefferies, E. (2011). The neural organization of semantic control: TMS evidence for a distributed network in left inferior frontal and posterior middle temporal gyrus. Cereb. Cortex 21(5), 1066-1075.
74. Whitney, C., Kirk, M., O'Sullivan, J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., and Jefferies, E. (2012). Executive semantic processing is underpinned by a large-scale neural network: revealing the contribution of left prefrontal, posterior temporal, and parietal cortex to controlled retrieval and selection using TMS. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24(1), 133-147.
75. Ziemke, T. (2002). Situated and embodied cognition (special issue). Cogn. Syst. Res. 3(3).
76. Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 44, ed. B. H. Ross (New York, NY: Academic Press), 35-62.