Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 716-724

  Barsalou, Lawrence W ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Architectures; Embodiment; Grounding; Imagery; Knowledge; Mental simulation; Situated cognition; Symbolic operations

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HISTORY; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

COGNITION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 79957871137     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Barsalou, L. W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. C. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, & M. A. Conway (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29-101). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (2005). Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In L. Gershkoff-Stowe & D. Rakison (Eds.), Building object categories (pp. 389-431). Carnegie Symposium Series. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (2008a). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
5. Barsalou, L. W. (2008b). Grounding symbolic operations in the brain's modal systems. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 9-42). New York: Cambridge.
6. Barsalou, L. W., Breazeal, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing, 8, 79-91.
7. Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A., & Ruppert, J. (2003). Social embodiment. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 43 (pp. 43-92). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. A. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245-283). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9. Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp. 129-163). New York: Cambridge.
10. Berkeley, G. (1982). A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published in 1710).
11. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383-462). New York: Academic Press.
12. Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
13. Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 355-363.
14. Cangelosi, A., & Riga, T. (2006). An embodied model for sensorimotor grounding and grounding transfer: Experiments with epigenetic robots. Cognitive Science, 30, 673-689.
15. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. Joshi, B. Webber, & I. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). New York: Cambridge.
16. Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25-62.
17. Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behavior. Brain Research, 1079, 4-14.
18. Epicurus (341-270BC). (1987). Sensation, imagination, and memory. In A. A. Long & D. N. Sedley (Eds.), The Hellenistic philosophers, Vol. 1 (pp. 72-101). New York: Cambridge.
19. Farah, M. J., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 339-357.
20. Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Feldman, J. A. (2006). From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
22. Gibbs Jr., R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gibbs Jr., R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
26. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335-346.
27. Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning as mental simulation. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 280-285.
28. Hume, D. (1978). A treatise on human nature (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1739).
29. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1419-1432.
31. Kant, E. (1965). The critique of pure reason (N. K. Smith, Trans). New York: St. Martin's Press. (Original work published in 1787).
32. Kirsh, D. (1991). Today the earwig, tomorrow man. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 161-184.
33. Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
37. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38. Locke, J. (1959). An essay concerning human understanding (1st ed., Vol. I and II). New York: Dover. (Original work published in 1690).
39. Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2008). Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic. In M. De Vega, A. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning: A debate (pp. 309-326). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
40. Martin, A. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In R. Cabeza & A. Kingstone (Eds.), Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (pp. 153-186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45.
42. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184-211.
43. O'Reilly, R. C., & Norman, K. A. (2002). Hippocampal and neocortical contributions to memory: Advances in the complementary learning systems framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 505-510.
44. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
45. Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. (Eds.) (2005). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Pezzulo, G., & Calvi, G. (in press). Computational explorations of perceptual symbol system theory. New Ideas in Psychology.
47. Plaut, D. C. (2002). Graded modality-specific specialization in semantics: A computational account of optic aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 603-639.
48. Price, H. H. (1953). Thinking and experience. London: Hutchinson's Universal Library.
49. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
50. Prinz, J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
51. Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253-336.
52. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576-582.
53. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793-797.
54. Reid, T. (1969). Essays on the intellectual powers of man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published in 1785).
55. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
56. Rubin, D. C. (2006). The basic-systems model of episodic memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 277-311.
57. Russell, B. (1919). On propositions: What they are and how they mean. Aristotelean Society Supplementary, 2, 1-43. (Reprinted in Slater, J. G. (Ed.) (1986). The collected papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 8: The philosophy of logical atomism and other essays, 1914-19 (pp. 276-306). London: George Allen & Unwin.)
58. Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417-424.
59. Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.) (2008). Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61. Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 451-486.
62. Smith, L. B. (2005). Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment. Developmental Review, 25, 278-298.
63. Smith, L. B., & Gasser, M. (2005). The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial Life, 11, 13-30.
64. Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredelo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp. 225-282). New York: Plenum Press.
65. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring "how" from "where." Neurosychologia, 41, 280-292.
67. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
68. Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., & Sali, E. (2002). Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1-6.
69. De Vega, M., Glenberg, A. M., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.) (2008). Symbols, embodiment, and meaning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
70. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-854.
71. Wennekers, T., Garagnani, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2006). Language models based on Hebbian cell assemblies. Journal of Physiology - Paris, 100, 16-30.
72. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636.
73. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspsecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460-473.
74. Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 35-62). York: Academic Press.