Dissociations of action means and outcome processing in left-hemisphere stroke

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1224-1233

  Kalénine, Solène ^a,b   Shapiro, Allison D ^a   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^a  

^a MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Action representation; Means; Object related action; Outcome; Stroke; Voxel based lesion symptom mapping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MOTION; NEUROANATOMY; OBSERVATION; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GESTURES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STROKE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84877803828     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Avants B.B., Schoenemann P.T., Gee J.C. Lagrangian frame diffeomorphic image registration: Morphometric comparison of human and chimpanzee cortex. Medical Image Analysis 2006, 10:397-412.
2. Bekkering H., Wohlschla A., Gattis M. Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 53A:153-165.
3. Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., Gattis M. Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A: Human Experimental Psychology 2000, 53(1):153-164.
4. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1995, 57:289-300.
5. Bernstein N.A. On dexterity and its development. Dexterity and its development 1996, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. M.L. Latash, M.T. Turvey (Eds.).
6. Brennan L., Giovannetti T., Libon D.J., Bettcher B.M., Duey K. The impact of goal cues on everyday action performance in dementia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2009, 19(4):562-582.
7. Buxbaum L.J. Ideomotor apraxia: A call to action. Neurocase 2001, 7(6):445-458.
8. Buxbaum L.J., Giovannetti T., Libon D. The role of the dynamic body schema in praxis: Evidence from primary progressive apraxia. Brain and Cognition 2000, 44(2):166-191.
9. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K., Grossman M., Coslett H.B. Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: Evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex 2007, 43:411-423.
10. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., Menon R. On beyond mirror neurons: Internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25(1):226-239.
11. Buxbaum L.J., Schwartz M.F., Montgomery M.W. Ideational apraxia and naturalistic action. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1998, 15(6/7/8):617-643.
12. Cattaneo L., Sandrini M., Schwarzbach J. State-dependent TMS reveals a hierarchical representation of observed acts in the temporal, parietal, and premotor cortices. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(9):2252-2258.
13. Cooper R.P., Schwartz M.F., Yule P., Shallice T. The simulation of action disorganisation in complex activities of daily living. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22(8):959-1004.
14. Cooper R.P., Shallice T. Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2000, 17(4):297-338.
15. Cooper R.P., Shallice T. Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychological Review 2006, 113(4):887-916. discussion 917-931.
16. De Baene W., Albers A.M., Brass M. The what and how components of cognitive control. NeuroImage 2012, 63(1):203-211.
17. Lange F.P., Spronk M., Willems R.M., Toni I., Bekkering H. Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Current Biology 2008, 18(6):454-457. de.
18. Dehaene S., Changeux J.P. A hierarchical neuronal network for planning behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997, 94(24):13293-13298.
19. Farag C., Troiani V., Bonner M., Powers C., Avants B., Gee J., et al. Hierarchical organization of scripts: Converging evidence from FMRI and frontotemporal degeneration. Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 2010, 20(10):2453-2463.
20. Gauthier L., Dehaut F., Joanette Y. The bells test, a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1989, 11:1149-1154.
21. Goldenberg G., Hartmann-Schmid K., Sürer F., Daumüller M., Hermsdörfer J. The impact of dysexecutive syndrome on use of tools and technical devices. Cortex 2007, 43(3):424-435.
22. Grafton S.T., Hamilton A.F.D.C. Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Human Movement Science 2007, 26(4):590-616.
23. Hamilton A.F.D.C., Grafton S.T. Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2006, 26(4):1133-1137.
24. Hamilton A.F.D.C., Grafton S.T. Action outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. Cerebral cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 2008, 18(5):1160-1168.
25. Hesse M.D., Sparing R., Fink G.R. End or means-The "what" and "how" of observed intentional actions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(4):776-790.
26. Hickok G., Hauser M. (Mis)understanding mirror neurons. Current Biology: CB 2010, 20(14):593-594.
27. Holmes C.J., Hoge R., Collins L., Woods R., Toga A.W., Evans A.C. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1998, 22:324-333.
28. Iacoboni M., Molnar-Szakacs I., Gallese V., Buccino G., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology 2005, 3(3):529-535.
29. Jax S.A., Buxbaum L.J., Moll A.D. Deficits in movement planning and intrinsic coordinate control in ideomotor apraxia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(12):2063-2076.
30. Johnson-Frey S.H., Newman-Norlund R., Grafton S.T. A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 2005, 15(6):681-695.
31. Kalénine S., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B. Critical brain regions for action recognition: Lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 2010, 133(11):3269-3280.
32. Kaneko T., Tomonaga M. Relative contributions of goal representation and kinematic information to self-monitoring by chimpanzees and humans. Cognition 2012, 125(2):168-178.
33. Kertesz A. The western aphasia battery 1982, Grune & Stratton, New York.
34. Kilner J.M. More than one pathway to action understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2011, 15(8):352-357.
35. Laimgruber K., Goldenberg G., Hermsdörfer J. Manual and hemispheric asymmetries in the execution of actual and pantomimed prehension. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43(5):682-692.
36. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology, Paris 2008, 102(1-3):59-70.
37. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2001, 24:167-202.
38. Norman W., Shallice T. Attention to action. Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory 1986, vol. 4:1-18. Plenum, New York.
39. Ocampo B., Painter D.R., Kritikos A. Event coding and motor priming: How attentional modulation may influence binding across action properties. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation cérébrale 2012, 219(1):139-150.
40. Ogawa K., Inui T. Multiple neural representations of object-directed action in an imitative context. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation cérébrale 2012, 216(1):61-69.
41. Ortigue S., Sinigaglia C., Rizzolatti G., Grafton S.T. Understanding actions of others: The electrodynamics of the left and right hemispheres. A high-density EEG neuroimaging study. PloS One 2010, 5(8):1-13.
42. Randerath J., Goldenberg G., Spijkers W., Li Y., Hermsdörfer J. From pantomime to actual use: How affordances can facilitate actual tool-use. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(9):2410-2416.
43. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:169-192.
44. Rorden C., Karnath H.-O., Bonilha L. Improving lesion-symptom mapping. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19(7):1081-1088. 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1081.
45. Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. Retrieving information from a hierarchical plan. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33(6):1076-1091.
46. Schwartz M.F. The cognitive neuropsychology of everyday action and planning. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23(1):202-221.
47. Schwartz M.F., Brecher A.R., Whyte J., Klein M.G. A patient registry for cognitive rehabilitation research: A strategy for balancing patients' privacy rights with researchers' need for access. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005, 86(9):1807-1814.
48. Schwartz M.F., Segal M.E., Veramonti T., Ferraro M., Buxbaum L.J. The naturalistic action test: A standardised assessment for everyday-action impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2002, 12:311-339.
49. Shallice T., Burgess P. The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 1996, 351(1346):1405-1411.
50. Sirigu A., Zalla T., Pillon B., Grafman J., Agid Y., Dubois B. Encoding of sequence and boundaries of scripts following prefrontal lesions. Cortex 1996, 32(2):297-310.
51. Spunt R.P., Falk E.B., Lieberman M.D. Dissociable neural systems support retrieval of how and why action knowledge. Psychological Science 2010, 21(11):1593-1598.
52. Spunt R.P., Lieberman M.D. Dissociating modality-specific and supramodal neural systems for action understanding. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2012, 32(10):3575-3583.
53. Stanton N.A. Hierarchical task analysis: Developments, applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics 2006, 37(1):55-79.
54. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Conceptual knowledge for understanding other's actions is organized primarily around action goals. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 189(1):99-107.
55. van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Neural mechanisms underlying immediate and final action goals in object use reflected by slow wave brain potentials. Brain Research 2007, 1148:183-197.
56. Wild K.S., Poliakoff E., Jerrison A., Gowen E. The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204(3):353-360.
57. Zalla T., Plassiart C., Pillon B., Grafman J., Sirigu A. Action planning in a virtual context after prefrontal cortex damage. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39(8):759-770.
58. Zalla T., Pradat-Diehl P., Sirigu A. Perception of action boundaries in patients with frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(12):1619-1627.
59. Zanini S. Generalised script sequencing deficits following frontal lobe lesions. Cortex 2008, 44(2):140-149.
60. Zanini S., Rumiati R.I., Shallice T. Action sequencing deficit following frontal lobe lesion. Neurocase 2002, 8(1-2):88-99.