Teachers and didacticians: Key stakeholders in the processes of developing mathematics teaching

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 173-188

  Jaworski, Barbara ^b   Huang, Rongjin ^a  

^a MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Inquiry based professional practice; Mathematics teachers and didacticians; Mathematics teaching development; Mathematics teaching knowledge; Reflective practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898765899     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-014-0574-2     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Anthony, G., Hunter, R., & Thompson, Z. (2014). Learning about expansive learning: Lessons from one teacher's journey. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0553-z.
2. Archibald, S., Coggshall, J. G., Croft, A., & Goe, L. (2011). High-quality professional development for all teachers: Effectively allocating resources. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
3. Askew, M., Rhodes, V., Brown, M., Wiliam, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy. London: King's College. Department of Education and Professional Studies.
4. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407.
5. Banwell, C. S., Saunders, K. D., & Tahta, D. S. (1972). Starting points. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Barlow, A. T., Burroughs, E. A., Harmon, S. E., Sutton, J. T., & Yopp, D. A. (2014). Assessing views of coaching via a video-based tool. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0557-7.
7. Bartolini-Bussi, M. (1991). Social interaction and mathematical knowledge. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth PME Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1-16). Genova, Italy: Department of Mathematics, University of Genova.
8. Bednarz, N., Fiorentini, D., & Huang, R. (2011). International approaches to professional development for mathematics teachers. Canada: Ottawa University Press.
9. Beswick, K., & Chapman, O. (2012). Mathematics teacher educators' knowledge for teaching. Paper presented at the 12th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Coex, Seoul, Korea.
10. Beswick, K., & Chapman, O. (2013). Mathematics teacher educators' knowledge. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 215). Kiel, Germany: PME.
11. Blanton, M. L., Westbrook, S., & Carter, G. (2005). Using Valsiner's Zone Theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(1), 5-33.
12. Breen, C. (1999). Circling the square: Issues and dilemmas concerning teacher transformation. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & A. J. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 112-121). London/Philadelphia: Falmer.
13. Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition (pp. 21-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Campbell, P. F., & Malkus, N. N. (2014). The mathematical knowledge and beliefs of elementary mathematics specialist-coaches. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0559-6.
15. Carter, R., & Richards, J. (1999). Dilemmas of constructivist mathematics teaching: Instances from classroom practice. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & A. J. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 68-76). London/Philadelphia: Falmer.
16. Chapman, O. (2008). Mathematics teacher educators' learning from research on their instructional practices. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 115-136). Rotterdam: Sense.
17. Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 22(2), 87-103.
18. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9-13.
19. Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. (2011). Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13, 6-33.
20. Cochran-Smith, M. C. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 5-28.
21. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & C. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education, 24 (pp. 249-306). Washington, DC: The American Educational Research Association.
22. Coles, A. (2014). Mathematics teachers learning with video: The role, for the didactician, of a heightened listening. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0541-3.
23. Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. Constructivist views on the learning and teaching of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph 4, pp. 107-122 and 195-210. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24. Confrey, J. (1995). How compatible are radical constructivism, sociocultural approaches and social constructivism? In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 185-226). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Confrey, J., Castro-Filho, J., & Wilhelm, J. (2000). Implementation research as a means to link systemic reform and applied psychology in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 179-191.
26. Cooney, T. J. (1984). The contribution of theory to mathematics teacher education. In H. G. Steiner, et al. (Eds.), Theory of mathematics education (TME) (pp. 120-131). Bielefeld, Germany: University of Bielefeld/IDM.
27. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
28. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath.
29. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
30. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen & R-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
32. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1-24.
33. Even, R. (2005). Integrating knowledge and practice at MANOR in the development of providers of professional development for teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 343-357.
34. Even, R. (2008). Facing the challenge of educating educators to work with practicing mathematics teachers. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 57-74). Rotterdam: Sense.
35. Even, R., & Ball, D. L. (Eds.). (2009). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics-the 15th ICMI Study. New York: Springer.
36. Goodchild, S. (2014). Mathematics teaching development: Learning from developmental research in Norway. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0567-6.
37. Goodchild, S., & Sriraman, B. (2012). Revisiting the didactic triangle: From the particular to the general. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44, 581-585.
38. Goos, M. (2005). A sociocultural analysis of the development of pre-service and beginning teachers' pedagogical identities as users of technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(1), 35-59.
39. Goos, M. (2014). Researcher-teacher relationships and models for teaching development in mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0556-9.
40. Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2010). Theoretical perspectives on mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 499-507.
41. Hart, K. (Ed.). (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16. London: John Murray.
42. Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualising and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.
43. Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2009). Pursuing excellence in mathematics classroom instruction through exemplary lesson development in China: A case study. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 297-309.
44. Huang, R., Su, H., & Xu, S. (2014). Developing teachers' and teaching researchers' professional competence in mathematics through Chinese Lesson Study. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46 (2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0557-8.
45. Huang, R, Xu, S., Su, H., & Tang, B. (2012, July). Teaching researchers in China: Hybrid functions of researching, supervising and consulting. Paper to be presented at 12th International Conference on Mathematics Education, Seoul, Korea.
46. Irwin, J. C., & Britt, M. S. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of mathematics and reflective professional development. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & A. J. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 90-100). London/Philadelphia: Falmer.
47. Jaworski, B. (1990). Video as a tool for teachers' professional development. Professional Development in Education, 16(1), 60-65.
48. Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: Falmer.
49. Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 3-31.
50. Jaworski, B. (2001). Developing mathematics teaching: Teachers, teacher educators, and researchers as co-learners. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 295-320). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
51. Jaworski, B. (2003). Research practice into/influencing mathematics teaching and learning development: Towards a theoretical framework based on co-learning partnerships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(2-3), 249-282.
52. Jaworski, B. (2004). Grappling with complexity: Co-learning in inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 17-32). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
53. Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 187-211.
54. Jaworski, B. (2008a). Building and sustaining inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development: Teachers and didacticians in collaboration. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (Vol. 3, pp. 309-330). Rotterdam: Sense.
55. Jaworski, B. (2008b). Development of the mathematics teacher educator and its relation to teaching development. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 335-361). Rotterdam: Sense.
56. Jaworski, B., & Goodchild, S. (2006). Inquiry community in an activity theory frame. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stelikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 353-360). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
57. Jaworski, B., & Potari, D. (2009). Bridging the macro-micro divide: Using an activity theory model to capture complexity in mathematics teaching and its development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 219-236.
58. Jaworski, B., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). International handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional. Rotterdam: Sense.
59. Jaworski, B., Wood, T., & Dawson, A. J. (1999). Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives. London/Philadelphia: Falmer.
60. Kemmis, S. (1985). Action research and the politics of reflection. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
61. Kieran, C., Krainer, K., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2013). Linking research to practice: Teachers as key stakeholders in mathematics education research. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 361-392). New York: Springer.
62. Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J. A. (1997). Situated cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Krainer, K. (1999). PFL-Mathematics: Improving professional practice in mathematics teaching. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood & A. J., Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 101-111). London/Philadelphia: Falmer.
64. Krainer, K., & Zehetmeier, S. (2013). Inquiry-based learning for students, teachers, researchers, and representatives of educational administration and policy: Reflections on a nation-wide initiative fostering educational innovations. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 875-886.
65. Krauss, K., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., et al. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 716-725.
66. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
69. Leont'ev, A. N. (1979). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-71). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
70. Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133-150.
71. Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19-44). London: Ablex.
72. Lerman, S. (2006). Socio-cultural research in PME. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 347-366). Rotterdam: Sense.
73. Li, Y., & Even, R. (2011). Approaches and practices in developing teachers' expertise in mathematics instruction: An introduction. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(6-7), 759-762.
74. Lin, P. J. (2002). On enhancing teachers' knowledge by constructing cases in classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 54(4), 317-349.
75. Lin, F. L., & Cooney, T. J. (2001). Making sense of mathematics teacher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
76. Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 429-459). Rotterdam: Sense.
77. Love, E. (1988). Evaluating mathematical activity. In D. Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 249-262). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
78. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. London: Addison Wesley.
79. McNiff, J. (1988). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Macmillan Education.
80. Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1999). Teachers' mathematical experiences as links to children's needs. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & A. J. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 32-40). London/Philadelphia: Falmer.
81. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
82. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Education.
83. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in schools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Pepin, B., Gududet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teachers' work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 929-943.
85. Perks, P., & Prestage, S. (2008). Tools for learning about teaching and learning. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 265-280). Rotterdam: Sense.
86. Ponte, J. P. (2011). Preparing teachers to meet the challenges of statistics education. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10. 1007/978-94-007-1131-0.
87. Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers' knowledge and practices. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past present and future (pp. 461-494). Rotterdam: Sense.
88. Potari, D., & Jaworski, B. (2002). Tackling complexity in mathematics teaching development: Using the teaching triad as a tool for reflection and analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 351-380.
89. Potari, D., Sakonidis, C., Chatzigoula, A., & Manaridis, A. (2010). Teachers' and researchers' collaboration in analyzing mathematics teaching: A context for professional reflection and development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 473-485.
90. Romberg, T. A., & Carpenter, T. P. (1986). Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 850-873). New York: Macmillan.
91. Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers' mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255-281.
92. Rowland, T., Turner, F., & Thwaites, A. (2014). Research into teacher knowledge: A stimulus for development in mathematics teacher education practice. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0564-9.
93. Sakonidis, H., & Potari, D. (2014). Mathematics teachers educators'/researchers' collaboration with teachers as a context for professional learning. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-014-0569-z.
94. Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(1), 133-145.
95. Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
96. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Oxford: Jossey-Bass.
97. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
98. Sherin, M. (2007). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1-28). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
99. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
100. Silver, E. A. (Ed.). (1985). Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
101. Silverman, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Toward a framework for the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 499-511.
102. Simon, M. (2008). The challenge of mathematics teacher education in an era of mathematics education reform. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 17-30). Rotterdam: Sense.
103. Simon, M. A., & Schifter, D. E. (1991). Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 309-331.
104. Skemp, R. R. (1971). The psychology of learning mathematics. London: Penguin.
105. Smith, K. (2005). Teacher educators' expertise: What do novice teachers and teacher educators say. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 177-192.
106. Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157-223). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
107. Steffe, L. P. (1983). The teaching experiment methodology in a constructivist research program. In M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak, & M. Suydam (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematics Education (pp. 469-471). Boston: Birkhauser.
108. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 191-209.
109. Stenhouse, L. (1984). Evaluating curriculum evaluation. In C. Adelman (Ed.), The politics and ethics of evaluation (pp. 75-84). London: Croom Helm.
110. Sullivan, P., & Wood, T. (2008). The international handbook of mathematics teacher education. Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (Vol. 1). Rotterdam: Sense.
111. Sztajn, P., Wilson, P. H., Edgington, C., & Myers, M. (2014). Mathematics professional development as design for boundary encounters. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0560-0.
112. Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
113. Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., & Tabach, M. (2014). Using video as a tool for promoting inquiry among preschool teachers and didacticians of mathematics. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0563-x.
114. Tsui, A. B. M., & Wong, J. L. N. (2009). In search of a third space: Teacher development in Mainland China. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 281-314). New York: Springer.
115. Tzur, R. (2001). Becoming a mathematics teacher-educator: Conceptualizing the terrain through self-reflective analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 259-283.
116. Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children's action: A theory of human development (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
117. von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching of mathematics (pp. 3-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
118. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
119. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
121. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
122. Wood, T., Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Dillon, D. (1993). Rethinking elementary school mathematics: Insights and issues. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph 6. Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.
123. Yang, Y. (2009). How a Chinese teacher improved classroom teaching in Teaching Research Group: A case study on Pythagoras theorem teaching in Shanghai. ZDM- The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 279-296.
124. Zaslavsky (2008). Meeting the challenges of mathematics teacher education through design and use of tasks that facilitate teacher learning. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 93-114). Rotterdam: Sense.
125. Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(1), 5-32.