Inquiry-based learning for students, teachers, researchers, and representatives of educational administration and policy: Reflections on a nation-wide initiative fostering educational innovations

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 875-886

  Krainer, Konrad ^a   Zehetmeier, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

Action research; Educational policy; Innovations in mathematics and science teaching; Inquiry based learning; Reform project; Theory and practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887388910     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0537-z     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
2. Altrichter, H., & Posch, P. (1996). Mikropolitik der Schulentwicklung. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
3. Altrichter, H., & Posch, P. (2009). Action research, professional development and systemic reform. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), Educational action research (pp. 213-225). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
4. Baumert, J., Klieme, E., & Watermann, R. (1998). Jenseits von Gesamttest- und Untertestwerten: Analyse differentieller Itemfunktionen am Beispiel des mathematischen Grundbildungstests der Dritten Internationalen Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie der IEA (TIMSS). In H.-J. Herber & F. Hoffmann (Eds.), Schulpädagogik und Lehrerbildung (pp. 301-324). Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
5. Baumert, J., & Watermann, R. (2000). Institutionelle und regionale Variabilität und die Sicherung gemeinsamer Standards in der gymnasialen Oberstufe. In J. Baumert, W. Bos, & R. Lehmann (Eds.), TIMSS/III. Dritte Internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie-Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn, Vol. 2 (pp. 317-372). Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
6. Dalin, P. (1999). Theorie und Praxis der Schulenwicklung. Neuwied, Germany: Luchterhand.
7. DEZA, Direktion für Entwicklungshilfe und Zusammenarbeit (2002). Glossar deutsch [German glossary]. Bern, Switzerland: DEZA.
8. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
9. Ernest, P. (Ed.). (1994). Mathematics, education and philosophy: An international perspective. London, UK: Falmer Press.
10. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Fullan, M. (2006). The future of educational change: system thinkers in action. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 113-122.
12. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
13. Hanfstingl, B., Andreitz, I., Müller, F. H., & Thomas, A. (2010). Are self-regulation and self-control mediators between psychological basic needs and intrinsic teacher motivation? Journal for Educational Research Online, 2(2), 55-71.
14. Hanfstingl, B., & Gnambs, T. (in preparation). Satisfaction of basic psychological needs and the decline of academic intrinsic motivation during adolescence.
15. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 693-700.
16. Heintel, P., Krainer, L., & Paul-Horn, I. (Eds.). (2003). Interventionswissenschaft-Interventionsforschung. Erörterungen zu einer Prozesswissenschaft vor Ort. Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Interventionsforschung, Vol. 2 (pp. 85-102). Klagenfurt, Austria: IFF.
17. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers' knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1-28.
18. Krainer, K. (1993). Powerful tasks: a contribution to a high level of acting and reflecting in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(1), 65-93.
19. Krainer, K. (1998). Some considerations on problems and perspectives of inservice mathematics teacher education. In C. Alsina, et al. (Eds.), 8th International Congress on Mathematics Education: Selected lectures (pp. 303-321). Sevilla, Spain: S. A. E. M. Thales.
20. Krainer, K. (2001). Teachers' growth is more than the growth of individual teachers: the case of Gisela. In F.-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 271-293). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
21. 2). Initial outcome of a nation-wide initiative for upper secondary schools in Austria. Mathematics Education Review, 16(April 2003), 49-60.
22. Krainer, K. (2003b). Teams, communities & networks. Editorial. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 93-105.
23. Krainer, K. (2005). IMST3. Ein nachhaltiges Unterstützungssystem. IMST3. A sustainable support system. Austrian Education News (Hrsg. BMBWK), 44(2005), 8-14.
24. Krainer, K. (2011). Teachers as stakeholders in mathematics education research. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 47-62). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
25. Krainer, K., Dörfler, W., Jungwirth, H., Kühnelt, H., Rauch, F., & Stern, T. (Eds.). (2002). Lernen im Aufbruch. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
26. Krainer, K., Hanfstingl, B., & Zehetmeier, S. (Eds.). (2009). Fragen zur Schule-Antworten aus Theorie und Praxis. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
27. Krainer, K., Senger, H., & Andreitz, I. (2013). Endbericht zum Projekt IMST 2010-2012. Innovationen Machen Schulen Top. Unpublished project report. Klagenfurt, Austria: AAU.
28. Kreis, I. (2009). Professionalität im Lehrberuf: Was ist das? Eine Annäherung aus Praxis und Theorie, Dissertation. Klagenfurt, Austria: AAU.
29. Leder, G., Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (2002). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education?. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Lipowsky, F. (2004). Was macht Fortbildungen für Lehrkräfte erfolgreich? [What makes teacher professional development successful?]. Die Deutsche Schule, 96, 462-479.
31. Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K., & Hewson, P. (1996). Principles of effective professional development for mathematics and science education: a synthesis of standards. NISE Brief, 1(1), 1-6.
32. Maaß, K., & Artigue, M. (2013). Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching-a synthesis. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0528-0.
33. Maldonado, L. (2002). Effective professional development. Findings from research. http://apcentral. collegeboard. com/apc/public/repository/ap05_profdev_effectiv_41935. pdf (Accessed 16 Aug 2013).
34. Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
35. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. J., & Smith, T. A. (1998). Mathematics and science achievement in the final year of secondary school: IEA's third international mathematics and science study. Boston, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.
36. Mundry, S. (2005). What experience has taught us about professional development. National Network of Eisenhower Regional Consortia and Clearinghouse.
37. Prenzel, M., & Ostermeier, C. (2006). Improving mathematics and science instruction: a program for the professional development of teachers. In F. Oser, F. Achtenhagen, & U. Renold (Eds.), Competence oriented teacher training. Old research demands and new pathways (pp. 79-96). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
38. Prenzel, M., Schratz, M., & Messner, R. (2007). Evaluation von IMST3. Bericht an das Bundesministerium für Unterricht. Evaluation report.
39. Rauch, F., & Erlacher, W. (in preparation). Educational networks.
40. Rauch, F., & Kreis, I. (Eds.). (2007). Lernen durch fachbezogene Schulentwicklung. Schulen gestalten Schwerpunkte in den Naturwissenschaften, Mathematik und Informatik. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
41. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
42. Scharizer, M. (2002). Anwendung von offenem Lernen bei der Erarbeitung neuer Stoffgebiete. Reflective paper. https://www. imst. ac. at/imst-wiki (Accessed 16 Aug 2013).
43. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
44. Schuster, A. (2008). Ich schreibe, also lerne ich: welche Anreize bewegen Lehrkräfte zum Schreiben über ihre Praxis?. Regensburg, Germany: Roderer.
45. Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157-223). Greenwich, CT: NCTM.
46. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
47. Stern, T. (2009). The role of formative assessment in enhancing independent learning and reflective teaching: some results of the Austrian IMST-Project. In K. Subramaniam & A. Mazumdar (Eds.), Proceedings of the epiSTEME-3-conference (pp. 209-214). Mumbai, India: HBCSE Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.
48. Stern, T., & Streissler, A. (2006). Professionalitätsentwicklung von Lehrer/innen(teams) [Professional development of teacher teams]. Klagenfurt, Austria: University of Klagenfurt.
49. Tatto, M. T., & Coupland, D. B. (2003). Teacher education and teachers' beliefs: theoretical and measurement concerns. In J. Rath & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 123-181). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
50. von Glasersfeld, E. (Ed.). (1991). Radical constructivism in mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
51. Willke, H. (1999). Systemtheorie II: Interventionstheorie (3rd ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius UTB.
52. Wilson, M., & Cooney, T. J. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. The role of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127-148). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
53. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
54. Zehetmeier, S. (2008). Zur Nachhaltigkeit von Lehrer/innenfortbildung. [Dissertation]. Klagenfurt, Austria: AAU.
55. Zehetmeier, S. (2010). Aktionsforschung in der Lehrerfortbildung: Was bleibt? In F. H. Müller, A. Eichenberger, M. Lüders, & J. Mayr (Eds.), Lehrerinnen und Lehrer lernen. Konzepte und Befunde der Lehrerfortbildung (pp. 197-211). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
56. Zehetmeier, S., & Krainer, K. (2011). Ways of promoting the sustainability of mathematics teachers' professional development. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(6/7), 875-887.
57. Zehetmeier, S., & Krainer, K. (2013). Researching the sustainable impact of professional development programmes on participating teachers' beliefs. In Y. Li & J. N. Moschkovich (Eds.), Proficiency and beliefs in learning and teaching mathematics (pp. 139-155). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.