Mathematics professional development as design for boundary encounters

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 201-212

  Sztajn, Paola ^a   Wilson, P Holt ^b   Edgington, Cyndi ^a   Myers, Marrielle ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898725483     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0560-0     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akkerman, S., & Baker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132-169.
2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, C. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
3. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307-333). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9-13.
5. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
6. Confrey, J. (2006). The evolution of design studies as methodology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 135-151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Confrey, J. (2012). Better measurement of higher-cognitive processes through learning trajectories and diagnostic assessments in mathematics: The challenge in adolescence. In V. Reyna, M. Dougherty, S. B. Chapman, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The adolescent brain: Learning, reasoning, and decision making (pp. 155-182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Confrey, J., & Lachance, A. (2000). Transformative teaching experiments through conjecture-driven research design. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 231-265). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. rdconference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 345-353), Thessaloniki, Greece.
10. Dawson, S. (1999). The enactive perspective on teacher development: A path laid while walking. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspective. London: Falmer Press.
11. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
12. Gravemeijer, K., & van Eerde, D. (2009). Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 510-524.
13. Jaworski, B. (2011). Situating mathematics teacher education in a global context. In N. Bernardz, D. Fiorentini, & H. Rongjin (Eds.), International approaches to professional development for mathematics teachers (pp. 2-20). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.
14. thConference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 353-360), Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
15. Kelly, A., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (2008). Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education. Innovations in Science, technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning and Teaching. New York: Routledge.
16. Kieran, C., Krainer, K., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2012). Linking research to practice: Teachers as key stakeholders in mathematics education research. In M. Clements, et al. (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 361-392). New York: Springer.
17. thConference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 47-62). Ankara, Turkey: PME.
18. McKennery, S., & Reeves, T. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
19. Philipp, R. (2008). Motivating prospective elementary school teachers to learn mathematics by focusing upon children's mathematical thinking. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 7-26.
20. thconference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 99-103). Thessaloniki, Greece.
21. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
23. Simon, M. (2008). The challenge of mathematics teacher education in an era of mathematics education reform. In B. Jaworski & T. Woods (Eds.) International handbook of mathematics teacher education-The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol 4, pp. 17-30). Rotterdam, Netherland: Sense Publishers.
24. Smith, M. (2001). Practice based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
25. Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
26. Sztajn, P. (2008). Caring relations in the education of practising mathematics teachers. In B. Jaworski & T. Woods (Eds.) International handbook of mathematics teacher education-The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 299-314). Rotterdam, Netherland: Sense Publishers.
27. Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Towards a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 147-156.
28. Sztajn, P., Wilson, P. H., Edgington, C., Meyers, M., & Dick, L. (2013). Using design experiments to conduct research on mathematics professional development. Revista Alexandria, Journal of Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 9-34.
29. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Wilson, P. H., Sztajn, P., & Edgington, P. (2012). Designing professional learning tasks for mathematics learning trajectories. In Tso, T. (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (pp. 227-234), Taipei, Taiwan.