Mathematics teaching development: Learning from developmental research in Norway

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 305-316

  Goodchild, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Community of inquiry; Mathematics teaching development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898763001     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0567-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Artigue, M. (2009). Didactical design in mathematics education. In C. Winslow (Ed.), Nordic research in mathematics education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
2. Berg, C. V., Fuglestad, A. B., Goodchild, S., & Sriraman, B. (2012). Mediated action in teachers' discussions about mathematics tasks. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44, 677-689.
3. Breiteig, T., & Goodchild, S. (2010). The development of mathematics education as a research field in Norway. In. B. Sriraman, C. Bergsten, S. Goodchild, G. Palsdottir, B. Dahl, & L. Haapasalo (Eds.), The first sourcebook on Nordic research in mathematics education: Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark and contributions from Finland (pp. 11-33). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
4. Fernandez, C. (2005). Lesson study: A means for elementary teachers to develop the knowledge of mathematics needed for reform-minded teaching? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7, 265-289.
5. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
6. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Routledge/Falmer.
7. Gellert, U. (2008). Routines and collective orientations in mathematics teachers' professional development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 93-110.
8. Goodchild, S. (2008). A quest for 'good' research. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International Handbook on Mathematics Teacher Education: Vol. 4. The Mathematics Teacher Educator as a Developing Professional: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 201-220). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
9. Goodchild, S. (2011). Using different sociocultural perspectives in mathematics teaching development research. In M. Pytlak, E. Swoboda & T. Rowland (Eds.), CERME 7: Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, pp. 2421-2430.
10. Goodchild, S., Jaworski, B., & Fuglestad, A. B. (2013). Critical alignment in inquiry-based practice in developing mathematics teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84, 393-412. doi: 10. 1007/s10649-013-9489-z.
11. Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Educational development and developmental research in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 443-471.
12. Grønmo, L. S., & Onstad, T. (Eds.). (2009). Tegn til bedring?: Norske elevers prestasjoner i matematikk og naturfag i TIMSS 2007. Oslo: Unipub. Retrieved from http://www. timss. no/rapport2007/Hele_TIMSS2007. pdf.
13. Grønmo, L. S., & Onstad, T. (Eds.). (2012). Mange og store utfordringer: Et nasjonalt og internasjonalt perspectiv på utdanning av lærere i matematikk basert på data fra TEDS-M 2008 (Many and great challenges: A national and international perspective on the education of teachers in mathematics based on data from TEDS-M 2008). Oslo: Unipub.
14. Hewitt, D. (1996). Mathematical fluency: The nature of practice and the role of subordination. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(2), 28-35.
15. Hewitt, D. (2012). Young students learning formal algebraic notation and solving linear equations: Are commonly experienced difficulties avoidable? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81, 139-159.
16. Jaworski, B. (2006). Developmental research in mathematics teaching and learning: Developing learning communities based on inquiry and design. In P. Liljedahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2006 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group. Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary.
17. Jaworski, B., Fuglestad, A. B., Bjuland, R., Breiteig, T., Goodchild, S., & Grevholm, B. (Eds.). (2007). Læringsfelleskap i matematikk [Learning Communities in Mathematics]. Bergen, Norway: Caspar Forlag.
18. Jørgensen, K. O., Steinsland, I. B., & Solheim, P. E. (2007). Modeller for å utforske og oppdage matematikk [Models for investigating and discovering mathematics]. In B. Jaworski, A. B. Fuglestad, R. Bjuland, T. Breiteig, S. Goodchild, & B. Grevholm (Eds.), Læringsfelleskap i matematikk [Learning Communities in Mathematics] (pp. 71-80). Bergen, Norway: Caspar Forlag.
19. KD (2006). Kunnskapsløftet: [Knowledge promotion]. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
20. KD (2012). Strategi for ungdomstrinnet: Motivasjon og mestring for bedre læring-Felles satsing på klasseledelse, regning, lesing og skriving [Strategy for the lower secondary grades: Motivation and mastery for better learning-common effort of class leadership, calculation, reading and writing]. Retrieved from: http://www. regjeringen. no/nb/dep/kd/dok/rapporter_planer/planer/2012/strategi-for-ungdomstrinnet. html?id=682495.
21. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York: Routledge.
22. Kjærnsli, M., Lie, R., Olsen, R. V., & Roe, A. (2007). Tid for tunge løft: Norske elevers prestasjoner i naturfag, lesing og matematikk i PISA 2006. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from http://www. utdanningsdirektoratet. no/upload/Forskning/Internasjonale_undersokelser/Tid_for_tunge_loft. pdf.
23. Kjærnsli, M., & Roe, A. (Eds.). (2010). På rett spor: Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag i PISA 2009 Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Retrieved from: http://www. pisa. no/publikasjoner/egne_publikasjoner/index. html.
24. Knapp, N. F., & Peterson, P. L. (1995). Teachers' interpretations of 'CGI' after four years: Meanings and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 40-65.
25. Marton, F., et al. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Nortvedt, G. A. (2012). Norsk matematikkråds forkunnskapstest 2011 [Norwegian Mathematics Council's prior-knowledge test 2011]. Norsk matematikkråd. Retrieved from: http://matematikkradet. no/styret@matematikkradet. no.
27. Ruthven, K., & Goodchild, S. (2008). Linking researching with teaching: Towards synergy of scholarly and craft knowledge. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 561-588). New York: Routledge.
28. Schifter, D., & Simon, M. A. (1992). Assessing teacher's development of a constructivist view of mathematics learning. Teaching & Teacher Education, 8, 187-197.
29. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221-258.
30. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
31. UD (2006). Kunnskapsstatus om frafall i videregående opplæring Faktaark-februar 2006 [Knowledge status about dropout from upper secondary education Factsheet-February 2006]. Retrieved May 24, 2010 from http://www. udir. no/upload/Statistikk/Gjennomforing/Kunnskapsstatus_om_frafall_2. pdf.
32. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
33. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.