Re-sourcing teachers' work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 929-943

  Pepin, B ^a   Gueudet, G ^b   Trouche, L ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE OCCIDENTALE   (France)

^c French Institute of Education   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888037597     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0534-2     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205-224.
2. Artigue, M. (1994). Didactical engineering as a framework for the conception of teaching products. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Strasser, & B. Winkelman (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 27-39). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Assude, T. (2007). Changements et résistances à propos de l'intégration des nouvelles technologies dans l'enseignement des mathématiques au primaire. Informations, Savoirs, Décisions et Médiations (ISDM), 29. http://isdm. univ-tln. fr/articles/num_archives. htm#isdm29. Accessed 6 August 2013.
4. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14.
5. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Maschietto, M. (2008). Machines as tools in teacher education. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 183-208). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
6. Behm, S. L., & Lloyd, G. M. (2009). Factors influencing student teachers' use of mathematics curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work-Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 205-222). New York: Routledge.
7. Borba, M. C., & Gadanidis, G. (2008). Virtual communities and networks of practising mathematics teachers. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 181-206). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
8. Borba, M. C., & Llinares, S. (2012a). Online mathematics teacher education: overview of an emergent field of research. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), 697-704.
9. Borba, M. C., & Llinares, S. (2012b). Special issue: Online mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6).
10. Borko, H., Jacobs, J. K., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417-436.
11. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
13. Brown, M. W. (2002). Teaching by design: Understanding the intersection between teacher practice and the design of curricular innovations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston.
14. Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work-Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 205-222). New York: Routledge.
15. Bueno-Ravel, L., Forest, D., Gueudet, G., & Sensevy, G. (2010). Guidelines for design of on line resources for IBST. Mind the Gap FP7 Project 217725. http://uv-net. uio. no/mind-the-gap/Finished%20Deliverables/5. 2_Guidelines%20for%20ICT%20design. doc. pdf. Accessed 6 August 2013.
16. Caprotti, O., & Seppälä, M. (2007). Evaluation criteria for eContent quality. Joining Educational Mathematics, ECP-2005-EDU-038208. http://www. jem-thematic. net/files_private/D%202. 1. pdf. Accessed 6 August 2013.
17. Choppin, J. (2011). Learned adaptations: Teachers' understanding and use of curriculum resources. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(5), 331-353.
18. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307-333). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 9-13.
20. Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. (2011). Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 6-33.
21. Cobb, P., Jackson, K., Smith, T., Sorum, M., & Henrick, E. C. (2013). Design research with educational systems: investigating and supporting improvements in the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. In B. J. Fishman, W. R. Penuel, A.-R. Allen, & B. H. Cheng (Eds.), Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook. New York: Teachers College Record. http://www. isls. org/icls2014/Resources. htm. Accessed 6 August 2013 (in press).
22. Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2008). District development as a means of improving mathematics teaching and learning at scale. In K. Krainer, & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 231-254). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
23. Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83-95.
24. Confrey, J. (2006). The evolution of design studies as methodology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 135-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Confrey, J., Bell, K., & Carrejo, D. (2001). Systemic crossfire: What implementation research reveals about urban reform in mathematics. Austin: University of Texas.
26. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
27. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 5-8.
28. Diekema, A. R. & Olsen Whitney, M. (2012). The notion of relevance in teacher information behavior. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Baltimore.
29. Drijvers, P. (2012). Teachers transforming resources into orchestrations. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche, (Eds.) (2012), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 265-281). New York: Springer.
30. Drijvers, P., Tacoma, S., Besamusca, A., Doorman, M., & Boon, P. (2013). Digital resources inviting mathematics teachers' professional development: the case of the DPICT project. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0535-1.
31. Fan, L., Jones, K., Wang, J., & Xu, B. (Eds.) (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(5).
32. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson studies: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Fischbein, E. (1977). Image and concept in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8, 153-165.
34. Freudenthal, H., Janssen, G. M., & Sweers, W. J. (1976). Five years IOWO on H. Freudenthal's retirement from the Directorship of IOWO: IOWO snapshots. Dordrecht: Reidel.
35. Grant, T. J., Kline, K., Crumbaugh, C., Kim, O. K., & Cengiz, N. (2008). How can curriculum material support teachers in pursuing student thinking during whole-group discussion? In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 103-117). New York: Routledge.
36. Gravemeijer, K. (1993). The empty number line as an alternative means of representation for addition and subtraction. In J. de Lange, I. Huntley, C. Keitel, & M. Niss (Eds.), Innovation in mathematics education by modeling and applications (pp. 141-159). Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
37. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17-51). London: Routledge.
38. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2012). From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. New York: Springer.
39. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013a). Collective work with resources: an essential dimension for teacher documentation. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0527-1.
40. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013b). Textbooks design and digital resources. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Designing and using tasks for learning mathematics. 22nd ICMI study. http://hal. archives-ouvertes. fr/docs/00/83/74/88/PDF/ICMI_STudy_22_proceedings_2013-FINAL_V2. pdf. Accessed 6 August 2013.
41. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199-218.
42. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2012a). Teachers' work with resources: Documentation geneses and professional geneses. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. New York: Springer.
43. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2012b). Communities, documents and professional geneses: Interrelated stories. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 305-322). New York: Springer.
44. Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567-590.
45. Haspekian, M. (2005). An instrumental approach to study the integration of a computer tool into mathematics teaching: The case of spreadsheets. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(2), 109-141.
46. Haspekian, M., & Artigue, M. (2007). L'intégration d'artefacts informatiques professionnels à l'enseignement dans une perspective instrumentale: le cas des tableurs. In M. Baron, D. Guin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), Environnements informatisés et ressources numériques pour l'apprentissage (pp. 37-63). Paris: Hermès.
47. Healy, L., & Lagrange, J.-B. (2010). Introduction to section 3. In C. Hoyles & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematical education and digital technologies: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 287-292). New York: Springer.
48. Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J. B. (Eds.). (2010). Mathematical education and digital technologies: Rethinking the terrain. New York: Springer.
49. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Kent, P. (2004). On the integration of digital technologies into mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 309-326.
50. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Vahey, P., &, Roschelle, J. (2013). Cornerstone mathematics: designing digital technology for teacher adaptation and scaling. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7) (this issue).
51. Huang, R., & Jaworski, B. (Eds.) (2014). Practices and strategies of promoting professional development of didacticians and teachers of mathematics: an international perspective. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2) (forthcoming).
52. Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2009). Pursuing excellence in mathematics classroom instruction through exemplary lesson development in China: A case study. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 297-309.
53. Jaworski, B. (2008). Building and sustaining inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development: Teachers and didactitians in collaboration. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 309-330). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
54. Kazemi, E. (2008). School development as a means of improving mathematics teaching and learning: Towards multidirectional analyses of learning across contexts. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 209-230). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
55. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203-235.
56. Kieran, C., Boileau, A., Tanguay, D., & Drijvers, P. (2013) Design researchers' documentational genesis in a study on equivalence of algebraic expressions. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7). (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0516-4.
57. Kieran, C., Tanguay, D., & Solares, A. (2012). Researcher-designed resources and their adaptation within classroom teaching practice: shaping both the implicit and the explicit. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 189-214). New York: Springer.
58. Krainer, K. (2008). Individuals, teams, communities and networks; participants and ways of participation in mathematics teacher education. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (eds.) International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 1-10), Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
59. Lagrange, J.-B., & Erdogan, E. O. (2009). Teachers' emergent goals in spreadsheet-based lessons: Analysing the complexity of technology integration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(1), 65-84.
60. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Llinares, S., & Olivera, F. (2008). Virtual communities of prospective mathematics teachers: technologies, interactions and new forms of discourse. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 155-180). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
62. Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers' conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(3), 227-252.
63. Lloyd, G. M., Remillard, J. T., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2008). Teachers' use of curriculum material: an emerging field. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.) (2008). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 3-14). New York: Routledge.
64. Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Maschietto, M., & Soury-Lavergne S. (2013). Merging material, didactical and digital resources: an example for primary school mathematics with the pascaline and Cabri Elem. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0533-3.
66. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.
67. Monaghan, J. (2001). Teachers' classroom interactions in ICT-based mathematics lessons. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 383-390). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
68. Monaghan, J. (2004). Teachers' activities in technology-based mathematics lessons. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 327-357.
69. Nührenbörger, M., & Steinbring, H. (2008). Manipulatives as tools in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education, Vol. 2: Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 157-181). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
70. O'Shea, T. (1993). The role of manipulatives in mathematics education. Contemporary Education, 65(1), 6-9.
71. Ono, Y., & Ferreira, J. (2010). A case study of continuing teacher professional development through lesson study in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 30, 59-74.
72. Pédauque, R. T. (coll.) (2006). Le document à la lumière du numérique. Caen: C & F éditions.
73. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organising research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331-337.
74. Pepin, B. (2012). Working with teachers on curriculum materials to develop mathematical knowledge in/for teaching: Task analysis as 'catalytic tool' for feedback and teacher learning. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 123-142). New York: Springer.
75. Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Investigating textbooks as crucial interfaces between culture, policy and teacher curricular practice: two contrasted case studies in France and Norway. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(5). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0526-2.
76. Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: a way to understand teaching and learning cultures. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 33(5), 158-175.
77. Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin.
78. Rabardel, P., & Béguin, P. (2005). Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design. Theoretical issues. Ergonomics Science, 6(5), 429-461.
79. Radford, L. (2012). On the cognitive, epistemic, and ontological roles of artefacts. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 283-288). New York: Springer.
80. Remillard, J. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315-342.
81. Remillard, J. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
82. Remillard, J. (2012). Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers' transactions with mathematics curriculum resources. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 105-122). New York: Springer.
83. Remillard, J. (2013) Beyond the script: Educative features of five mathematics curricula and how teachers use them. In Introductory symposium presentation at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association in San Francisco, May 2013.
84. Remillard, J., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M. (Eds.). (2008). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. New York: Routledge.
85. Rezat, S. (2012). Interactions of teachers' and students' use of mathematics textbooks. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 231-246). New York: Springer.
86. Runesson, U. (2008). Learning to design for learning. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 1, pp. 153-172)., Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
87. Ruthven, K. (2012). Constituting digital tools and material as classroom resources: An example in dynamic geometry. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 83-103). New York: Springer.
88. Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2002). A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 47-88.
89. Ruthven, K., & Hofmann, R. (2013). Chance by design: Devising an introductory probability module for implementation at scale in English early-secondary education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(3), 409-423.
90. Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research: Instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329-342.
91. Sensevy, G. (2012). Patterns of didactic intentions. Thought collectives and documentation work. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 43-57). New York: Springer.
92. Sensevy, G., Forest, D., Quilio, S., & Morales, G. (2013). Cooperative engineering as a specific design-based research in joint action theory in didactics. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0532-4.
93. Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers' use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467-500.
94. Shield, M., & Dole, S. (2008). A methodology for evaluating middle-years mathematics textbooks. Paper presented at ICME 11, Monterrey, Mexico.
95. Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Charamlambous, C. Y., & Mills, V. (2009). Exploring curriculum implementation plateau: An instructional perspective. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work-Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 245-265). New York: Routledge.
96. Stein, M. K., & Kim, G. (2009). The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large scale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning. In J. Remillard, G. Lloyd, & B. Herbel-Eisenmann (Eds.), Teachers' use of mathematics curriculum materials: Research perspectives on relationships between teachers and curriculum (pp. 37-55). New York: Routledge.
97. Streefland, L. (1990). Fractions in realistic mathematics education, a paradigm of developmental research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
98. Stylianides, A. J. & Stylianides, G. J. (Eds.) (2013) Special Issue: Classroom-based interventions in mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 333-341.
99. Swan, M., & Dorman, M. (2013). Designing and using professional development resources for inquiry-based learning. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0520-8.
100. Tabak, I. (2004). Reconstructing context: Negotiating the tension between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 225-233.
101. Trgalová, J., & Jahn, A.-P. (2013). Quality issue in the design and use of resources by mathematics teachers. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0525-3.
102. Trgalová, J., Soury-Lavergne, S., & Jahn, A. P. (2011). Quality assessment process for dynamic geometry resources in Intergeo project: rationale and experiments. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(3), 337-351.
103. Tricot, A., Plégat-Soutjis, F., Camps, J.-F., Amiel, A., Lutz, G., & Morcillo, A. (2003). Utilité, utilisabilité, acceptabilité: Interpréter les relations entre trois dimensions de l'évaluation des EIAH. In C. Desmoulins, P. Marquet, & D. Bouhineau (Eds.), Environnements informatiques pour l'apprentissage humain (pp. 391-402). Paris: ATIEF/INRP.
104. Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students' command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 281-307.
105. Trouche, L., Drijvers, P., Gueudet, G., & Sacristan, A. I. (2013). Technology-driven developments and policy implications for mathematics education. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 753-790). New York: Springer.
106. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., KcKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Introducing educational design research. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. KcKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 3-7). London: Routledge.
107. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' 'learning to notice' in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276.
108. Vergnaud, G. (1998). Toward a cognitive theory of practice. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 227-241). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
109. Visnovska, J., & Cobb, P. (2013). Classroom video in teacher professional development program: community documentational genesis perspective. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7) (this issue). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0523-5.
110. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
111. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering research-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
112. Wedell, M. (2005). Cascading training down into the classroom: the need for parallel planning. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(6), 637-651.
113. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
114. Wiliam, D., & Lester, F. K. (2008). On the purpose of mathematics education research: Making productive contributions to policy and practice. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 32-48). New York: Routledge.
115. Winsløw, C. (2012). A comparative perspective on teacher collaboration: The cases of lesson study in Japan and of multidisciplinary teaching in Denmark. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 291-304). New York: Springer.
116. Wittman, E. C. (2001). Developing mathematics education in a systemic process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 1-20.
117. Yang, Y. (2009). How a Chinese teacher improved classroom teaching in Teaching Research Group: A case study on Pythagoras theorem teaching in Shanghai. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 279-296.