Linking research to practice: Teachers as key stakeholders in mathematics education research

Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 361-392

  Kieran, Carolyn ^a   Krainer, Konrad ^b   Michael Shaughnessy, J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^c PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894284129     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work; An introduction to action research across the professions (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge [German original: Altrichter, H. & Posch, P. (1990). Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt. Chinese translation 1997, Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan-Liou.].
2. Atweh, B. (2004). Understanding for changing and changing for understanding. Praxis between practice and theory through action research in mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 187-206). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Bazzini, L. (Ed.). (1994). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Systematic Cooperation between Theory and Practice in Mathematics Education (SCTP 5) in Grado: Theory and Practice in Mathematics Education. Pavia, Italy: ISDAF.
4. Bednarz, N. (1996). Language activities, conceptualization and problem solving: The role played by verbalization in the development of mathematical thought by young children. In H. M. Mansfield, N. A. Pateman, & N. Bednarz (Eds.), Mathematics for tomorrow's young children: International perspectives on curriculum (pp. 228-239). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Bednarz, N. (2004). Collaborative research and professional development of teachers in mathematics. In M. Niss & E. Emborg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education (CD version) (pp. 1-15). Copenhagen, Denmark: IMFUFA, Roskilde University.
6. Bednarz, N., Dufour-Janvier, B., Poirier, L., & Bacon, L. (1993). Socioconstructivist viewpoint on the use of symbolism in mathematics education. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29(1), 41-58.
7. Bednarz, N., Poirier, L., Desgagné, S., & Couture, C. (2001). Conception de séquences d'enseignement en mathématiques: Une nécessaire prise en compte des praticiens. In A. Mercier, G. Lemoyne, & A. Rouchier (Eds.), Le génie didactique: Usages et mésusages des theories de l'enseignement (pp. 43-70). Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck Université.
8. Benke, G., Hospesová, A., & Tichá, M. (2008). The use of action research in teacher education. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (International handbook of mathematics teacher education) (Vol. 3, pp. 283-307). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
9. Bromme, R. (1992). Der Lehrer als Experte. Zur Psychologie des professionellen Wissens. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
10. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11. Corey, D. L., Peterson, B. E., Lewis, B. M., & Bukarau, J. (2010). Are there any places that students use their heads? Principles of high-quality Japanese mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 438-478.
12. Crawford, K., & Adler, J. (1996). Teachers as researchers in mathematics education. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1187-1205). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Davis, R. B., Jockusch, E., & McKnight, C. (1978). Cognitive processes in learning algebra. Journal of Children's Mathematical Behavior, 2(1), 10-320.
14. Debien, J. (2010). Répertorier les modalités favorisant une démarche de développement professionnel chez les enseignants de mathématique de niveau secondaire (Master's thesis). Université du Québec à Montréal, Département de mathématiques.
15. Even, R., & Ball, D. L. (Eds.). (2003). Connecting research, practice and theory in the development and study of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics (special issue), 54(2-3).
16. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (Reprint by Routledge, 2009).
17. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
18. Freeman, R. E. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik (zfwu), 3(5/2004), 228-241.
19. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. Probing the depths of educational reform. London, UK: Falmer Press.
20. Goodchild, S., & Jaworski, B. (2005). Identifying contradictions in a teaching and learning development project. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 41-47). Melbourne, Australia: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
21. Hart, L. C., Alston, A., & Murata, A. (Eds.). (2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
22. Hattie, J. A. (2003, December). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Building teacher quality: What does the research tell us? Paper presented at a Conference held at the Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference:2003/4.
23. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Introduction to the project, the people, and the reflective activities. In B. Herbel-Eisenmann & M. Cirillo (Eds.), Promoting purposeful discourse. Teacher research in mathematics classrooms (pp. 3-28). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2010). Discourse analysis: A catalyst for reflective inquiry in mathematics classrooms. In Linking research and practice: The NCTM Research Agenda Conference report (pp. 36-37). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
25. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Cirillo, M. (Eds.). (2009). Promoting purposeful discourse: Teacher research in mathematics classrooms. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
26. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Cirillo, M., & Males, L. (2009). An argument for taking up similar work. In B. Herbel-Eisenmann & M. Cirillo (Eds.), Promoting purposeful discourse. Teacher research in mathematics classrooms (pp. 219-232). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
27. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Cirillo, M., & Otten, S. (2009). Synthesizing the bases of purposeful discourse: Reading, reflecting, and community. In B. Herbel-Eisenmann & M. Cirillo (Eds.), Promoting purposeful discourse: Teacher research in mathematics classrooms (pp. 205-217). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
28. Huang, R., & Bao, J. (2006). Towards a model for teacher professional development in China: Introducing Keli. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 279-298.
29. Huang, R., Li, Y., & He, X. (2010). What constitutes effective mathematics instruction? A comparison of Chinese expert and novice teachers' views. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10, 293-306.
30. Jaworski, B. (2006). Developmental research in mathematics teaching and learning: Developing learning communities based on inquiry and design. In P. Liljedahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3-16). Calgary, Canada: CMESG.
31. Jaworski, B. (2008). Development of mathematics teacher educators and its relation to teaching development. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (International handbook of mathematics teacher education) (Vol. 4, pp. 335-361). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
32. Jaworski, B. (2011). Situating mathematics teacher education in a global context. In N. Bednarz, D. Fiorentini, & R. Huang (Eds.), International approaches to professional development of mathematics teachers (pp. 2-51). Ottawa, Canada: Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa.
33. Jaworski, B., Fuglestad, A.-B., Bjuland, R., Breiteig, T., Goodchild, S., & Grevholm, B. (2007). Learning communities in mathematics. Bergen, Norway: Caspar Forlag.
34. Jaworski, B., & Goodchild, S. (2006). Inquiry community in an activity theory frame. In J. Novotná, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stelikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 353-360). Prague, Czech Republic: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
35. Jaworski, B., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (International handbook of mathematics teacher education) (Vol. 4). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
36. Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels: Building meaning for symbols and their manipulation. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 707-762). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
37. Kirshner, D., & Awtry, T. (2004). Visual salience of algebraic transformations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 224-257.
38. Krainer, K. (2006). Action research and mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 213-219.
39. Krainer, K. (2011). Teachers as stakeholders in mathematics education research. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 47-62). Ankara, Turkey: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
40. Krainer, K., & Llinares, S. (2010). Mathematics teacher education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 702-705). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
41. Li, Y., Huang, R., Bao, J., & Fan, Y. (2011). Facilitating mathematics teachers' professional development through ranking and promotion practices in the Chinese mainland. In N. Bednarz, D. Fiorentini, & R. Huang (Eds.), International approaches to professional development of mathematics teachers (pp. 72-87). Ottawa, Canada: Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa.
42. Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Education Research Journal, 19, 325-340.
43. Makar, K., & O'Brien, M. (2012). Blurring the boundaries: The transformative nature of research participation. In W. Midgley, P. A. Danaher, & M. Baguley (Eds.), The role of participants in education research: Ethics, epistemologies, and methods. London, UK: Routledge.
44. Matz, M. (1982). Towards a process model for high school algebra errors. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 25-50). London, UK: Academic Press.
45. Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study. In L. C. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education. Learning together (pp. 1-12). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
46. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010). Linking research and practice: The NCTM Research Agenda Conference Report. Reston, VA: Author.
47. OECD. (2011). Strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris, France: Author.
48. Pegg, J., & Krainer, K. (2008). Studies on regional and national reform initiatives as a means to improve mathematics teaching and learning at scale. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (International handbook of mathematics teacher education) (Vol. 3, pp. 255-280). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
49. Pegg, J., Lynch, T., & Panizzon, D. (2007). An exceptional schooling outcomes project: Mathematics. Brisbane, Australia: Post Press.
50. Pegg, J., & Panizzon, D. (2011). Collaborative innovations with rural and regional secondary teachers: Enhancing student learning in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal (special issue on "Mathematics Education in Rural Schools: Evidence-Based Approaches"), 23(2). doi:10.1007/s13394-011-0009-0.
51. Poirier, L., & Bacon, L. (1996). Interaction between children in mathematics class: An example concerning the concept of number. In H. M. Mansfield, N. A. Pateman, & N. Bednarz (Eds.), Mathematics for tomorrow's young children: International perspectives on curriculum (pp. 166-174). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
52. Poirier, L., Bourdage, N., & Bednarz, N. (1999). Un lien possible entre la recherche en didactique des mathématiques et la pratique de classe: la recherche collaborative. In F. Jacquet (Ed.), Les liens entre la pratique de la classe et la recherche en didactique des mathématiques. Actes de la CIEAEM 50 (pp. 193-197). Neufchâtel, Switzerland: Commission Internationale pour l'Etude et l'Amélioration de l'Enseignement des Mathématiques.
53. Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., & Schaffer, G. (Eds.). (2002). World class schools. International perspectives on school effectiveness. London, UK: Routledge.
54. Sato, M. (1992). Japan. In H. B. Leavitt (Ed.), Issues and problems in teacher education: An international handbook. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
55. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London, UK: Temple-Smith.
56. Shearer, B. A., Lundeberg, M. A., & Coballes-Vega, C. (1997). Making the connection between research and reality: Strategies teachers use to read and evaluate journal articles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 592-598.
57. Skovsmose, O., & Säljö, R. (2007). Report on the KUL-projects: Learning Communities in Mathematics and ICT in mathematics learning. Retrieved from http://www.navimat.dk/uploads/39600/Report-KULfinal_OSK_RS_okt07.pdf.
58. Steinbring, H. (1994). Dialogue between theory and practice in mathematics education. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträßer, & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 89-102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
59. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London, UK: Heinemann.
60. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering research-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
61. Zeuli, J. S. (1994). How do teachers understand research when they read it? Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 39-55.