Researcher-teacher relationships and models for teaching development in mathematics education

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 189-200

  Goos, Merrilyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Boundary practices; Community of practice; Peripheral participation; Research practice gap; Researcher teacher relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898712011     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0556-9     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotná, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 359-381.
2. Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 8, 132-169.
3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2012). General capabilities in the Australian Curriculum. Retrieved 24 March 2012. http://www. australiancurriculum. edu. au/GeneralCapabilities/Overview/.
4. Breen, C. (2003). Mathematics teachers as researchers: Living on the edge? In A. Bishop, M. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 523-544). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. Gill, M., & Boote, D. (2012). Classroom culture, mathematics culture, and the failures of reform: The need for a collective view of culture. Teachers College Record, 114(12), 1-45.
6. Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 258-291.
7. Goos, M. (2005). A sociocultural analysis of the development of pre-service and beginning teachers' pedagogical identities as users of technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(1), 35-59.
8. Goos, M. (2014). Technology integration in secondary school mathematics: The development of teacher professional identities. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development (pp. 139-161). New York: Springer.
9. Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2008). Developing a communal identity as beginning teachers of mathematics: Emergence of an online community of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(1), 41-60.
10. Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2011a). Improving numeracy education in rural schools: A professional development approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23, 129-148.
11. Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2006). In search of practical wisdom: A conversation between researcher and teacher. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(2), 37-39.
12. Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2011b). Teachers' personal conceptions of numeracy. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 457-464). Ankara: PME.
13. Heid, M., Middleton, J., Lawson, M., Gutstein, E., Fey, T., King, K., et al. (2006). The challenge of linking research and practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 76-86.
14. Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 75-102). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
15. Labaree, D. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13-22.
16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lerman, S. (2001). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In F. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 33-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 429-459). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
19. rdannual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 27-36). Sydney: MERGA.
20. McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.
21. Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Pozzi, S. (2000). Working knowledge: Mathematics in use. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgeway (Eds.), Education for mathematics in the workplace (pp. 17-35). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
22. Novotná, J., & Goos, M. (2007). Teachers researching with university academics. Working Session 2. In J. Woo, H. Lew, K. Park & D. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 188). Seoul: PME.
23. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
24. Quinn, D., & Berry, R. (2006). Modelling and the transit of Venus. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 20(1), 32-43.
25. Sfard, A., & McClain, K. (2002). Analyzing tools: Perspectives on the role of designed artifacts in mathematics learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2&3), 153-161.
26. Steen, L. (2001). The case for quantitative literacy. In L. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (pp. 1-22). Princeton: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
27. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
28. Weinburgh, M., Smith, L., & Smith, K. (1997). Preparing preservice teachers to use technology in teaching math and science. Techtrends, 42(5), 43-45.
29. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Wiliam, D. (2003). The impact of educational research on mathematics education. In A. Bishop, M. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 471-490). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
31. Willis, K., Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2012). Numeracy for what's in the news and building an expressway. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 68(1), 9-15.
32. Zack, V., Mousley, J., & Breen, C. (1997). Developing practice: Teachers' inquiry and educational change. Geelong: Centre for Studies in Mathematics, Science and Environmental Education, Deakin University.