SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT AS A MEANS OF IMPROVING MATHEMATICS TEACHING AND LEARNING: Towards Multidirectional Analyses of Learning across Contexts

Participants in Mathematics Teacher Education: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 3

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 209-230

  Kazemi, Elham ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85115691017     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Anderson, D. D. (2006). Home to school: Numeracy practices and mathematical identities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 261-286.
2. Arbaugh, F. (2003). Study groups as a form of professional development for secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 139-163.
3. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
4. Battey, D., & Franke, M. L. (in press). Transforming identities: Understanding teachers across professional development and classroom practice. Teacher Education Quarterly.
5. Berger, J. G., Boles, K. C., & Troen, V. (2005). Teacher research and school change: Paradoxes, problems, and possibilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 93-105.
6. Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Borasi, R., Fonzi, J., Smith, C. F., & Rose, B. J. (1999). Beginning the process of rethinking mathematics instruction: A professional development program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 49-78.
8. Boreham, N., & Morgan, C. (2004). A sociocultural analysis of organisational learning. Oxford Review of Education, 30, 307-325.
9. Borko, H., Wolf, S. A., Simone, G., & Uchiyama, K. P. (2003). Schools in transition: Reform efforts and school capacity in Washington State. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 171-202.
10. Burch, P., & Spillane, J. P. (2003). Elementary school leadership strategies and subject matter: Reforming mathematics and literacy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 103, 519-535.
11. Civil, M., & Bernier, E. (2006). Exploring images of parental participation in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 309-330.
12. Clarke, D. J., Emanuelsson, J., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. A. C. (Eds.). (2006). Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
13. Clarke, D. J., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider's perspective. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
14. Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2007, October). The challenge of scale: Designing schools and districts as learning organizations for instructional improvement in mathematics. Invited plenary at the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lake Tahoe, NV.
15. Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211-244.
16. Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (in press). District policy and teachers' social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
17. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & C. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 249-305). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
18. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119-142.
19. Collinson, V. (in press). Leading by learning: New directions in the 21st century. Journal of Educational Administration.
20. Collinson, V., & Cook, T. F. (2007). Organizational learning: Improving learning, teaching, and leading in school systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Cook, S., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10, 381-400.
22. Dean, C., & McClain, K. (2006, April). Situating the emergence of a professional teaching community within the institutional context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
23. Diversity in Mathematics Education Center for Learning and Teaching (DIME). (2007). Culture, race, power, and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 405-433). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
24. Drake, C. (2006). Turning points: Using teachers’ mathematics life stories to understand the implementation of mathematics education reform. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 579-608.
25. Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156.
26. Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2006). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. Science Education, 90, 68-93.
27. Erickson, G., Brandes, G. M., Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2005). Collaborative teacher learning: Findings from two professional development projects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 787798.
28. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers’ self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 67-80.
29. Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Learning to teach mathematics: Developing a focus on students’ mathematical thinking. Theory into Practice, 40, 102-109.
30. Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Shih, J., Biagetti, S., & Battey, D. (2005). Changing teachers’ professional work in mathematics: One school’s journey. In T. A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 209-230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Gamoran, A., Anderson, C. W., Quiroz, P. A., Secada, W. G., Williams, T., & Ashmann, S. (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Givvin, K. B., Hiebert, J., Jacobs, J. K., Hollingsworth, H., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Are there national patterns of teaching? Evidence from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Comparative Education Review, 49, 311-343.
33. Grossman, P. L., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108, 1-29.
34. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942-1012.
35. Gutiérrez, R. (1996). Practices, beliefs, and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 495-529.
36. Gutiérrez, R. (2007, October). Context matters: Equity, success, and the future of mathematics education. Invited plenary at the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lake Tahoe, NV.
37. Halverson, R. (2007). How leaders use artifacts to structure professional community in schools. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth, and dilemmas (pp. 93-105). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
38. Hiebert, J., Stigler, J. W., Jacobs, J. K., Givvin, K. B., & Garnier, H. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 111-132.
39. Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 207-236.
40. Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers' conversations. Journal of Learning Sciences, 16, 37-79.
41. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203-235.
42. Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 995-1006.
43. King, M. B. (2002). Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry. International Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 243-257.
44. Knapp, M. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 227-266.
45. Krainer, K. (2001). Teachers' growth is more than the growth of the individual teachers: The case of Gisela. In F.-L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 271-293). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
46. Krainer, K. (2006). How can schools put mathematics in their centre? Improvement=content+ community+context. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehliková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1. pp. 84-89). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
47. Krainer, K., & Peter-Koop, A. (2003). The role of the principal in mathematics teacher development: Bridging the dichotomy between leadership and collaboration. In A. Peter-Koop, A. Begg, C. Breen, & V. Santos-Wagner (Eds.), Collaboration in teacher education: Examples from the context of mathematics education (pp. 169-190). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
48. Kramer, S. L., & Keller, R. (2008). An existence proof: Successful joint implementation of the IMP curriculum and a 4 x 4 block schedule at a suburban U.S. high school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 2-8.
49. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
50. Lampert, M., Boerst, T., & Graziani, F.(under review). Using organizational assets in the service of ambitious teaching practice.
51. Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52. Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3, 149-164.
53. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Croninger, R. G. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70, 128-150.
55. Lin, P. (2002). On enhancing teachers’ knowledge by constructing cases in classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 317-349.
56. Little, J. W. (1999). Organizing schools for teacher learning. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 233-262). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57. Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ community of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917-946.
58. Little, J. W. (2004). “Looking at student work” in the United States: Competing impulses in professional development. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 94-118). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
59. Little, J. W., & Horn, I. S. (2007). ‘Normalizing’ problems of practice: Converting routine conversation into a resource for learning in professional communities. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth, and dilemmas (pp. 79-92). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
60. Lord, B. (1994). Teachers’ professional development: Critical colleagueship and the roles of professional communities. In N. Cobb (Ed.), The future of education: Perspectives on national standards in America (pp. 175-204). New York: The College Board.
61. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Martin, D. (2006). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 197-229.
63. Nickerson, S. M., & Moriarty, G. (2005). Professional communities in the context of teachers’ professional lives: A case of mathematics specialists. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 113-140.
64. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65. Remillard, J. T., & Jackson, K. (2006). Old math, new math: Parents’ experiences with standards-based reform. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 231-259.
66. Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5-10.
67. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 1, 209-229.
68. Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice build on each other. In E. Amsel & A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development (pp. 265-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Rousseau, C. K. (2004). Shared beliefs, conflict, and a retreat from reform: The story of a professional community of high school mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 783-796.
70. Secada, W. G., & Adajian, L. B. (1997). Mathematics teachers’ change in the context of their professional communities. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 193-219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34, 14-22.
72. Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1-27). New York: Elsevier Science.
73. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand teach: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 57, 1-22.
74. Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In T. A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 157-223). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. Spade, J. Z., Columba, L., & Vanfossen, B. E. (1997). Tracking in mathematics and science: Courses and course-selection procedures. Sociology of Education, 70, 108-127.
76. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
77. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78. Wolf, S. A., Borko, H., Elliott, R. L., McIver, M. C. (2000). “That dog won’t hunt!”: Exemplary school change efforts within the Kentucky reform. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 349-393.