Design research from a learning design perspective

Educational Design Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 17-51

  Gravemeijer, Koeno ^a   Cobb, Paul ^b  

^a Faculty of Science   (Netherlands)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85141110260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203088364-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Atkinson, P., Delamont, S., and Hammersley, M. (1988). Qualitative research traditions: A British response to Jacob. Review of Educational Research, 58, 231-50.
2. Bakker, A. (2004). Design Research in Statistics Education, on Symbolizing and Computer Tools. Utrecht: CDß Press.
3. Ball, D. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-97.
4. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-78.
5. Bruner, J. (1994). Four Ways to Make Meaning. Invited Address at the AERA Conference 1994, New Orleans.
6. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5-44.
7. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
8. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., and Whitenack, J. (1997). Symbolizing and mathematizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner and J. A. Whitson (eds), Situated Cognition Theory: Social, Semiotic, and Neurological Perspectives (pp. 151-233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Cobb, P. and Hodge, L. L. (2003, April). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
10. Cobb, P., McClain, K., and Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21(1), 1-78.
11. Cobb, P. and Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83-95.
12. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., and Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1-2), 113-64.
13. Cobb, P. and Whitenack, J. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom video recordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 213-28.
14. Cobb, P. and Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175-90.
15. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., and Wood T. (1989). Young children’s emotional acts while doing mathematical problem solving. In D. McLeod and V. M. Adams (eds), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective (pp. 117-48). New York: Springer.
16. diSessa, A. A. (1992). Images of learning. In E. De Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, and L. Verschaffel (eds), Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving (pp. 19-40). Berlin: Springer.
17. diSessa, A. A. (2002). Students’ criteria for representational adequacy. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, and L.Verschaffel (eds), Symbolizing, Modeling and Tool Use in Mathematics Education (pp. 105-29). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. diSessa, A. A. and Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
19. Doerr, H. M. and Zangor, R. (2000) Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 143-63.
20. Freudenthal, H. (1971). Geometry between the devil and the deep sea. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3, 413-35.
21. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an Educational Task. Dordrecht: Reidel.
22. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.
23. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Freudenthal, H., Janssen, G. M., and Sweers, W. J. (1976). Five Years IOWO on H. Freudenthal’s Retirement from the Directorship of IOWO: IOWO Snapshots. Dordrecht: Reidel.
25. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
26. Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1993). The empty number line as an alternative means of representation for addition and subtraction. In: J. de Lange, I. Huntley, C. Keitel, and M. Niss (eds), Innovation in Mathematics Education by Modeling and Applications (pp. 141-59). Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
27. Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing Realistic Mathematics Education. Utrecht: Cdß Press.
28. Gravemeijer, K. (1998). Developmental Research as a Research Method. In J. Kilpatrick and A. Sierpinska (eds), What is Research in Mathematics Education and What are its Results? ICMI Study Publication; Book 2 (pp. 277-95). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155-77.
30. Gravemeijer, K. and van den Akker, J. (2003, December). How to review proposals for design research? Working document for the PROO workshop, Amsterdam.
31. Hiebert and Stigler (1999). The Teaching Gap. New York: Free Press.
32. Kessels, J. P. A. M. and Korthagen, F. A. J. (1996). The relation between theory and practice: Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 25, 17-22.
33. Lijnse, P. L. (1987). Onderzoek, ontwikkeling en ontwikkelingsonderzoek: In en na het PLON. Panama-Post. Tijdschrift voor Nascholing en Onderzoek van het Reken-Wiskundeonderwijs, 6(1), pp. 35-43.
34. Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11.
35. Meira, L. (1995). The microevolution of mathematical representations in children’s activity. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 269-313.
36. Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 123-65.
37. NCTM Research Advisory Committee (1996). Justification and reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 516-20 (Emotional acts?).
38. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
39. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
40. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-45.
41. Smaling, A. (1990). Enige aspecten van kwalitatief onderzoek en het klinisch interview (Some aspects of qualitative research and the clinical interview). Tijdschrift voor Nascholing en Onderzoek van het Reken-Wiskundeonderwijs, 8(3), 4-10.
42. Smaling, A. (1992). Varieties of methodological intersubjectivity - the relations with qualitative and quantitative research, and with objectivity. Quality and Quantity, 26, 169-80.
43. Steffe, L. P. (1983). The teaching experiment methodology in a constructivist research program. In: M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak, and M. Suydam (eds), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 469-71). Boston: Birkhäuser.
44. Stephan, M., Bowers, J., Cobb, P., and Gravemeijer, K. (eds) (2003). Supporting students’ development of measuring conceptions: Analyzing students’ learning in social context. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No. 12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
45. Streefland, L. (1990). Fractions in Realistic Mathematics Education, a Paradigm of Developmental Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
46. Taylor, S. J. and Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings (second edition). New York: Wiley.
47. Thompson, A. G. and Thompson, P. W. (1996). Talking about rates conceptually, part II: Mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 2-24.
48. Thompson, P. W. and Thompson, A. G. (1994). Talking about rates conceptually, part I: A teacher’s struggle. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 279-303.
49. Treffers, A. (1987). Three Dimensions: A Model of Goal and Theory Description in Mathematics Instruction - The Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht: Reidel.
50. Tzou, C. (2000). Learning about data creation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
51. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, and T. Plomp (eds), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 1-14). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
52. Yackel, E. and Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-77.