Exploring the curriculum implementation plateau: An instructional perspective

Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 245-265

  Silver, Edward A ^a   Ghousseini, Hala ^a   Charalambous, Charalambos Y ^a   Mills, Valerie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Mathematics Education Resource Center (MERC)   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878064836     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203884645     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Banilower, E. R., Boyd, S. E., Pasley, J. D., & Weiss, I. R. (2006). Lessons from a decade of mathematics and science reform: A capstone report for the Local Systemic Change through Teacher Enhancement Initiative. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
2. Begle, E. G. (1973). Lessons learned from SMSG. Mathematics Teacher, 66, 207-214.
3. Bell, M., Bell, J., Bretzlauf, J., Dillard, A., Hartfield, R., & Isaacs, A. (2001). Everyday mathematics. DeSoto, TX: Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
4. Carroll, W. M., & Isaacs, A. (2003). Achievement of students using the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project's Everyday Mathematics. In L. Senk, & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (pp. 79-108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Clarke, D. M. (1997). The changing role of the mathematics teacher. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 278-308.
6. Eisenhart, M. (2006). Representing qualitative data. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 567-581). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Erickson, J. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
8. Fullan, M. (2004). System thinkers in action: Moving beyond the standards plateau. London: Department of Education and Skills, Innovation Unit, in partnership with NCSL.
9. Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975). Levels of use of innovation:A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1), 52-56.
10. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 514-549.
11. Hiebert, J., Stigler, J., Jacobs, J., Givvin, K., Garnier, H., Smith, M. et al. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 111-132.
12. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (1996). Connected Mathematics Project. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.
14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
16. Phillips, E., Lappan, G., & Grant, Y. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics curricula: Preparing the community, the district, and teachers. East Lansing, MI: CMP, Mathematics Department, Michigan State University.
17. St John, M., Heenan, B., Houghton, N., & Tambe, P. (2001). The NSF implementation and dissemination centers: An analytic framework. Inverness, CA: Inverness.
18. Schoen, H. L., Cebulla, J. J., Finn, K. F., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher variables that relate to student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 228-259.
19. Senk, S.L., & Thompson, D. R. (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C., & Strawhun, B. T. F. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 287-301.
21. Silver, E. A., Mills, V., Castro, A., & Ghousseini, H. (2006). Blending elements of lesson study with case analysis and discussion: A promising professional development synergy. In K. Lynch-Davis & R. L. Rider (Eds.), The work of mathematics teacher educators: Continuing the conversation (pp. 117-132). San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
22. Smith, M. S., & Bill, V. (2004, January). Thinking through a lesson: Collaborative lesson planning as a means for improving the quality of teaching. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, San Diego, CA.
23. Smith, M. S., Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (2005a). Improving instruction in algebra: Using cases to transform mathematics teaching and learning, Volume 2. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
24. Smith, M. S., Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (2005b). Improving instruction in rational numbers and proportionality:Using cases to transform mathematics teaching and learning, Volume 1. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
25. Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50-80.
26. Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268-275.
27. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455-488.
28. Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319-369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
29. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
30. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.