VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES AND NETWORKS OF PROSPECTIVE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS: Technologies, Interactions and New Forms of Discourse

Participants in Mathematics Teacher Education: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 3

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 155-179

  Llinares, Salvador ^a   Olivero, Federica ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952424990     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Andriessen, L., Erkens, G., van de Laank, C., Peters, N., & Coirier, N. (2003). Argumentation as negotiation in electronic collaborative writing. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognition in computers-supporters collaborative learning environment (pp. 79-115). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469.
3. Barnes, S., & Sutherland, R. (2007, August/September). Using videopapers for multi-purposes: Disseminating research practice and research results. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Budapest, Hungary.
4. Beardsley, L., Cogan-Drew, D., & Olivero, F. (2007). Videopaper: bridging research and practice for pre-service and experienced teachers. In R. Goldman, R. D. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 479-493). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Blanton, W. E., Moorman, G., & Trathen, W. (1998). Telecommunications and teacher education: A social constructivist review. In P. D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 235-276). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
6. Borba, M., & Villareal, M. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking. Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization. New York: Springer.
7. Byman, A., Jarvela, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2005). What is reciprocal understanding in virtual interaction? Instructional Science, 33, 121-136.
8. Callejo, M. L., Valls, J., & Llinares, S. (2007). Interacción y análisis de la enseñanza. Aspectos claves en la construcción del conocimiento professional [Interaction and analaysis of teaching. Key aspects in the construction of professional knowledge]. Investigación en la Escuela, 61, 5-21.
9. Carraher, D., Schliemann, A. D., & Brizuela, B. (2000). Bringing out the algebraic character of arithmetic. Paper presented at the Videopapers in Mathematics Education conference, Dedham, MA.
10. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Disessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
11. Dalgarno, N., & Colgan, L. (2007). Supporting novice elementary mathematics teachers’ induction in professional communities and providing innovative forms of pedagogical content knowledge development through information and communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1051-1065.
12. Daniil, M. (2007). The use of videopapers from Modern Foreign Language student teachers as a tool to support reflection on practice. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
13. Derry, Sh. J., Gance, S., Gance, L. L., & Schaleger, M. (2000). Toward assessment of knowledge-building practices in technology-mediated work group interactions. In E. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools. No more walls. (Vol. 2, pp. 29-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Galvis, A., & Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Sharing and reflecting on teaching practices by using VideoPaper Builder 2. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. http://www.editlib.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Reader.ViewAbstract&paper_id=12304&from=NEW DL (accessed on 18 October 2007).
15. García, M., Sánchez, V., Escudero, I., & Llinares, S. (2006). The dialectic relationship between research and practice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 109128.
16. Gee, G. P. (1996) Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: RoutledgeFalmer
17. Goffree, F., & Oonk, W. (2001). Digitizing real teaching practice for teacher education programmes: The MILE approach. In F.-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 111-146). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Goos, M., & Benninson, A. (2004). Emergence of a pre-service community of practice. In I. Putt, R. Faragher, & M. McLean (Eds.), MERGA27. Mathematics education for the third millennium: towards 2010 (pp. 271-278). James Cook University: Australia.
19. Goos, M., & Benninson, A. (2008). Developing a communal identity as beginning teachers of mathematics: Emergence of an online community of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 41-69.
20. Graven, M., & Lerman, S. (2003). Book review. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 185-194.
21. Greeno, J. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
22. Hiebert, J., Morris, A., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 47-61.
23. Krainer, K. (2003). Editorial. Teams, communities & networks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 93-105.
24. Lazarus, E., & Olivero, F. (2007, August/September). Using video papers for professional learning and assessment in initial teacher education. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Budapest, Hungary.
25. Lerman, S. (2001). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In F.-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 33-52). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
26. Lin, P. (2005). Using research-based video-cases to help pre-service primary teachers conceptualize a contemporary view of mathematics teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 351-377.
27. Llinares, S. (2002). Participation and reification in learning to teach. The role of knowledge and beliefs. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp.195-210). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Llinares, S. (2004). Building virtual learning communities and the learning of mathematics student teacher. Invited Regular Lecture Tenth International Congress for Mathematics Education (ICME), Copenhagen, Denmark.
29. Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 429-459). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
30. Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2007). The building of preservice primary teachers’ knowledge of mathematics teaching: interaction and online video case studies. Instructional Science, DOI: 10.1007/s11251-007-9043-4.
31. Makri, K., & Kynigos, C. (2007). The role of blogs in studying the discourse and social practices of mathematics teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 73-84.
32. McGraw, R., Lynch, K., Koc, Y., Budak, A., & Brown, C. (2007). The multimedia case as a tool for professional development: An analysis of online and face-to-face interaction among mathematics pre-service teachers, in-service teachers, mathematicians, and mathematics teacher educators. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 95-121.
33. Morris, A. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 471-505.
34. Mousley, J., Lambdin, D., & Koc, Y. (2003). Mathematics teacher education and technology. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 395-432). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. Nemirovsky, R., DiMattia, C., Ribeiro, B., & Lara-Meloy, T. (2005). Talking about teaching episodes. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 363-392.
36. Nemirovsky, R., Lara-Meloy, T., Earnest, D., & Ribeiro, B. (2001). Videopapers: Investigating new multimedia genres to foster the interweaving of research and teaching. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 423-430). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
37. Olivero, F., John, P., & Sutherland, R. (2004). Seeing is believing: Using videopapers to transform teachers’ professional knowledge and practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(2), 179-191.
38. Pea, R. D. (2006). Video-as-data and digital video manipulation techniques for transforming learning science research, education and other cultural practices. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, J. Hunsinger, & P. Trifonas (Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments (Vol. 2, pp. 13211394). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
39. Sánchez, V., García, M., & Escudero, I. (2006). Elementary presevice teacher learning levels. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 33-40). Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague.
40. Santagata, R., Zannoni, Cl., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 123-140.
41. Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49-70.
42. Schuck, S. (2003). The use of electronic question and answer forums in mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5, 19-30.
43. Sfard, A. (2001). There is more than discourse than meets the ears: looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 13-57.
44. Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy. Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 7593). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the roleof video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1-28). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd.
46. Smith, K., & Krumsvik, R. (2007). Video papers - A means for documenting practitioners’ reflections on practical experiences: The story of two teacher educators. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(4), 272-282.
47. Strijbos, J., Martens, R., Prins, F., & Jochems, W. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29-48.
48. Sutherland, R., Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Brawn, R., Gall, M., Matthewman, S., Olivero, F., Taylor, A., Triggs, P., Wishart, J., amp; John, P. (2004). Transforming teaching and learning: Embedding ICT into every-day classroom practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Special Issue, 20(6), 413-425.
49. Valls, J., Llinares, S., & Callejo, M. L. (2006). Video-clips y análisis de la enseñanza. Construcción del conocimiento necesario para enseñar matemáticas [Video-clips and analysis of teaching. Construction of the necessary knowledge to teach mathematics]. In M. C. Penalva, I. Escudero, & D. Barba (Eds.), Conocimiento, entornos de aprendizaje y tutorización para la formación del profesorado de matemáticas [Knowledge, learning environments and tutoring in mathematics teacher education] (pp. 25-43). Granada, Spain: Proyecto Sur, España.
50. Van Es, E., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.
51. Wade, S., Niederhauser, D., Cannon, M., & Long, T. (2001). Electronic discussions in an issues course. Expanding the boundaries of the classroom. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(3), 4-9.
52. Wells, G. (2002). Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
55. Zahn, C., Hesse, F., Finke, M., Pea, R., Mills, M., & Rosen, J. (2006). Advanced digital video technologies to support collaborative learning in school education and beyond. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 737-742). Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34, 451-480.