A comparative perspective on teacher collaboration: The cases of lesson study in Japan and of multidisciplinary teaching in Denmark

From Text to 'Lived' Resources: Mathematics Curriculum Materials and Teacher Development

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 291-304

  Winsløw, Carl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Curriculum reform; Didactic observation system; Lesson study; Mathematics teaching; Multidisciplinarity; Paradidactic infrastructure; Paradidactic system; Study inside school; Teacher collaboration; Transdisciplinarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888065861     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_15     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Brousseau, G. (1986). Fondations et méthodes de la didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 7(2), 33-115.
2. Chevallard, Y. (1991). La transposition didactique: du savoir savant au savoir enseigné (2ème édition). Grenoble: La pensée sauvage.
3. Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 19(2), 221-266.
4. Chevallard, Y., & Cirade, G. (2010). Les ressources manquantes comme problème professionnel - (Missing resources as a professional problem). In G. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.), Ressources vives: Le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques (pp. 111-128). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes et INRP.
5. Clarke, D. (2004). Patterns of participation in the mathematics classroom. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (vol. 2, pp. 231-238). Bergen: Bergen University College.
6. Dahl, E. (2004). Den politisk ukorrekte privatpraktiserende. Letter to the editor, Gymnasieskolen 4-04.
7. EVA (Danish Evaluation Institute). (2006). Almen studieforberedelse og studieområdet. Copenhagen: Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut.
8. EVA (Danish Evaluation Institute). (2009). Gymnasiereformen på HHX, HTX og STX. Copenhagen: Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut.
9. Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development. The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393-405.
10. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics learning and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Hansen, B. (2009). Didaktik på tværs af matematik og historie. Master Thesis, University of Copenhague, May 2009. Retrieved from http://www.ind.ku.dk/publikationer/studenterserien/studenterserie10/
12. Howe, E. (2005). Japan’s teacher acculturation: Critical analysis through comparative ethnographic narrative. Journal of Education for Teaching, 31(2), 121-131.
13. Isoda, M., Stephens, M., Ohara, Y., & Miyakawa, T. (2007). Japanese lesson study in mathematics. Its impact, diversity and potential for educational improvement. Singapore: World Scientific.
14. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The case of elementary science instruction. Journal of Educational Policy, 12(5), 313-331.
15. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Miyakawa, T., & Winsløw, C. (2009). Didactical designs for students’ proportional reasoning: An “open approach” lesson and a “fundamental situation”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 199-218.
17. Nohda, N. (1991). Paradigm of the “open-approach” method in mathematics teaching: Focus on mathematical problem solving. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik (now: ZDM -International Journal on Mathematics Education), 23(2), 32-37.
18. Padilla, M., & Riley, J. (2003). Guiding the new teacher: Induction of first-year teachers in Japan. In E. Britton, L. Paine, D. Pimm, & S. Raizen (Eds.), Comprehensive teacher induction: Systems for early career learning (pp. 261-295). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. Shimizu, Y. (1999). Aspects of mathematics teacher education in Japan: Focusing on teachers’ roles. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 107-116.
20. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
21. Tsubota, K. (1977). Opunendo no mondai wo toushite suugakutekina kangaekata wo nobasu [On developing mathematical way of thinking through open end approach problems]. Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education, 59(2), 2-5.
22. Winsløw, C. (2004). Quadratics in Japanese. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 51-74.