Patterns of didactic intentions, thought collective and documentation work

From Text to 'Lived' Resources: Mathematics Curriculum Materials and Teacher Development

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 43-57

  Sensevy, Gérard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE OCCIDENTALE   (France)

Author keywords

Didactics; Documentation work; Intention; Joint action theory in didactics; Strategic rules; Strategies; Thought style

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888020687     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Amade-Escot, C., & Venturini, P. (2009). Analyse de situations didactiques: Perspectives comparatistes. Dossiers des Sciences de L’éducation. Numéro Spécial, 20.
2. Baxandall, M. (1985). Patterns of intention: On the historical explanation of pictures. NewHaven, CT: Yale University Press.
3. Blumer, H. (2004). George Herbert Mead and human conduct. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Brousseau, G. (1997). The theory of didactic situations in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Brousseau, G. (2004). Les représentations: étude en théorie des situations didactiques. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 30(2), 241-277.
9. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. New York: Modern Library.
11. Douglas, M. (1987). How institutions think. London: Routledge.
12. Duranti, A. (2006). The social ontology of intentions. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 31-40.
13. Eilan, N., Hoert, C., Mc Cormack, T., & Roessler, J. (2005). Joint attention: Communication and other minds: Issues in philosophy and psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Fleck L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Hintikka, J., & Sandu, G. (2006). What is logic? In D. M. Gabbay, P. Thagard, & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 5, 20: Philosophy of Logic. London: Elsevier.
17. Ligozat, F. (2008). Un point de vue de didactique comparée sur la classe de mathématiques. Etude de l’action conjointe du professeur et des élèves à propos de l’enseignement/apprentissage de la mesure des grandeurs dans des classes françaises et suisses romandes. Thèse de Sciences de l’Education, Université de Genève et Université d’Aix-Marseille.
18. Mead, H. G. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107, 179-217.
20. Pérès, J. (1984). Use of the theory of situations with a view to identify didactic phenomena during a period of school learning. PhD thesis, University of Bordeaux II.
21. Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., Leutenegger, F., Ligozat, F., & Flückiger, A. (2007). Un modèle de l’action conjointe professeur-élèves: les phénomènes qu’il peut/doit traiter. In D. G. Sensevy & A. Mercier (Eds.), Agir Ensemble. L’action didactique conjointe du professeur et des élèves dans la classe (pp. 52-91). Rennes, France: PUR.
22. Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., Leutenegger, F., Ligozat, F., Flückiger, A., & Thevenaz-Christens, Th. (2010). Producing lists of objects to be remembered and communicated. The « treasure game » with 4 and 5 year old children. Fapse Genève University, Translated from French by N. Letzelter & F. Ligozat Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies andminds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10(2), 70-76.
24. Sensevy, G. (in press). Overcoming fragmentation: Towards a joint action theory in didactics. In B. Hudson & M. A. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning, and teaching. Leverkusen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
25. Sensevy, G., & Mercier, A. (2007). Agir ensemble. L’action didactique conjointe du professeur et des élèves. Rennes, France: PUR.
26. Sensevy, G., Mercier, A., Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., Ligozat, F., & Perrot, G. (2005). An attempt to model the teacher’s action in mathematics. Educational Studies in mathematics, 59(1), 153-181.
27. Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Santini, J., Laubé, S., & Griggs, P. (2008). Modelling, an epistemological approach: Cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education, 92, 424-446.
28. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.
30. Wittgenstein, L. (1997). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.