Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 211-246

  Remillard, Janine T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum materials; Curriculum use; Mathematics; Teaching; Textbooks

Indexed keywords

EID: 23244466820     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00346543075002211     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Ball, D. L. (1990). Reflections and deflections of the framework: The case of Carol Turner. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 247-260.
2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14.
3. Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401-423.
4. Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany: State University New York Press.
5. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. 8. Implementing and sustaining innovations (No. R-1589/8-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
6. Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473-498.
7. Brown, M. W. (2002). Teaching by design: Understanding the interactions between teacher practice and the design of curricular innovation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
8. Brown, M. W., & Edelson, D. C. (2001, April). Teaching by design: Curriculum design as a lens on instructional practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
9. Bush, W. S. (1986). Preservice teachers' sources of decisions in teaching secondary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 21-30.
10. Chavez, O. L. (2003). From the textbook to the enacted curriculum: Textbook use in the middle school mathematics classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
11. Chevallard, Y. (1988, August). On didactic transposition theory: Some introductory notes. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Research and Development in Mathematics, Bratislava, Czechoslavakia.
12. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). New York: Macmillan.
13. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327-345.
14. Cohen, D. K. (2000, April). Presentation by the 1999 winner of the Distinguished Contributions to Educational Research Award. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
15. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
16. Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers' learning. Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287.
18. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1986). On narrative method, personal philosophy, and the story of teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 293-310.
19. Cornbleth, C. (1988). Curriculum in and out of context. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3(2), 85-96.
20. Davenport, L. R. (2000). Elementary mathematics curricula as a tool for mathematics education reform: Challenges of implementation and implications for professional development. Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching (CDT) Paper Series, Education Development Center.
21. Donovan, B. F. (1983). Power and curriculum in implementation: A case study of an innovative mathematics program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
22. Dow, P. B. (1991). Schoolhouse politics: Lessons from the Sputnik era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486-516). New York: Macmillan.
24. Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (in press). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry.
25. Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2002, April). Changing models of curriculum use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
26. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121.
27. Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.
28. Floden, R. E., Porter, A. C., Schmidt, W. H., Freeman, D. J., & Schwille, J. R. (1981). Responses to curriculum pressures: A policy-capturing study of teacher decisions about content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 129-141.
29. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 67-80.
30. Freeman, D. J., & Porter, A. C. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 403-421.
31. Frykholm, J. A. (2004). Teachers' tolerance for discomfort: Implications for curricular reform in mathematics. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 19(2), 125-149.
32. Frykholm, J. A., & Pittman, M. (2002). Pedagogical discomfort in the context of mathematics education curricular reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
33. Gehrke, N. J., Knapp, M. S., & Sirotnik, K. A. (1992). In search of the school curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 18, 51-110.
34. Heaton, R. M. (1992). Who is minding the mathematics content? A case study of a fifth-grade teacher. Elementary School Journal, 93, 153-162.
35. Heaton, R. M. (2000). Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance. Practitioner Inquiry Series. New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2000). How discourse structures norms: A tale of two middle school mathematics classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
37. Kang, W., & Kilpatrick, J. (1992). Didactic transposition in mathematics textbooks. For the Learning of Mathematics, 72(1), 2-7.
38. Keiser, J. M., & Lambdin, D. V. (1996). The clock is ticking: Time constraint issues in mathematics teaching reform. Journal of Educational Research, 90(1), 23-30.
39. Komoski, P. K. (1977). Instructional materials will not improve until we change the system. Educational leadership, 42, 31-37.
40. Kuhs, T. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1979). The potential influence of textbooks on teachers' selection of content for elementary school mathematics. East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
41. Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers' conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(3), 227-252.
42. Lloyd, G. M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher's conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 248-274.
43. Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996). "This is so": A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics, Part 1 (pp. 371-409). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
44. Mailloux, S. (1982). Interpretive conventions: The reader in the study of American fiction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45. Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (1998). Mathematics curriculum reform and teachers: Understanding the connections. Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 27-41.
46. McCuthcheon, G. (1981). Elementary school teachers' planning for social studies and other subjects. Theory and Research in Social Education, 9, 45-66.
47. McLaughlin, M. W. (1976). Implementation as mutual adaptation. Teachers College Record, 77, 339-351.
48. Morgan, C. (1996). The language of mathematics: Towards a critical analysis of mathematics texts. For the Learning of Mathematics, 76(3), 2-10.
49. National Research Council. (2004). On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations. Washington, DC: Mathematical Science Education Board, Center for Education.
50. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
51. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). The principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
52. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
53. Otte, M. (1986). What is a text? In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howsen, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on math education (pp. 173-202). Kluwer: Dordrecht.
54. Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
55. Posner, G. J. (1988). Models of curriculum planning. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 77-97). Albany: State University of New York Press.
56. Preston, R. V., & Lambdin, D. V. (1995). Mathematics for all students! Mathematics for all teachers? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
57. Putnam, R. T. (1992). Teaching the "hows" of mathematics for everyday life: A case study of a fifth-grade teacher. Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 163-177.
58. Remillard, J. (1991). Abdicating authority for knowing: A teacher's use of an innovative mathematics curriculum (Elementary Subjects Center Series No. 42). East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, Center for the Learning and Teaching of Elementary Subjects, Michigan State University.
59. Remillard, J. (1992). Understanding teaching for understanding: A fifth-grade teacher's interpretation of mathematics policy. Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 179-193.
60. Remillard, J. T. (1996). Changing texts, teachers, and teaching: The role of textbooks in reform in mathematics education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
61. Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Elementary School Journal 700(4), 331-350.
62. Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315-342.
63. Remillard, J. T. (2002, April). Modes of engagement: Toward understanding teachers' transactions with unfamiliar curriculum resources. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
64. Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352-388.
65. Riordan, J. E., & Noyce, P. E. (2001). The impact of two standards-based mathematics curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 368-398.
66. Romberg, T. A. (1997). Mathematics in context: Impact on teachers. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 357-380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Russell, S. J. (1997). The role of curriculum in teacher development. In S. Friel & G. Bright (Eds.), Reflecting on our work: NCTM enhancement of K-6 mathematics (pp. 247-254). New York: University Press of America.
68. Sarason, S. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
69. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70. Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2004). Identifying patterns in teachers' use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Manuscript submitted for publication.
71. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 1-22.
72. Smith, J. P., III. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 387-402.
73. Smith, M. S. (2000). Balancing old and new: An experienced middle school teacher's learning in the context of mathematics instructional reform. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 351-375.
74. Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402-435). New York: Macmillan.
75. Sosniak, L. A., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: Materials use in four fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 249-275.
76. Spillane, J. P. (2000). A fifth-grade teacher's reconstruction of mathematics and literacy teaching: Exploring interactions among identity, learning, and subject matter. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 307-330.
77. Stake, R. E., & Easley, J. (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
78. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488.
79. Stein, M. K., Remillard, J. T., & Smith, M. S. (in press). How mathematics curriculum materials influence student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
80. Stephens, W. M. (1982). Mathematical knowledge and school work: A case study of the teaching of developing mathematical processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
81. Stodolsky, S. S. (1989). Mathematical knowledge and school work: A case study of the teaching of developing mathematical processes. In P. Jackson & S. Haroutunia-Gordon (Eds.), From Socrates to software: The teacher as text and the text as teacher (pp. 159-184). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82. Stray, C. (1994). Paradigms regained: Toward a historical sociology of the textbook. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(1), 1-29.
83. Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 105-127.
84. Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
85. Van Zoest, L. R., & Bohl, J. V. (2002). The role of reform curricular materials in an internship: The case of Alice and Gregory. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), 265-288.
86. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87. Walker, B. F. (1976). Curriculum evolution as portrayed through old textbooks. Terre Haute: Indiana State University, School of Education.
88. Wartofsky, M. (1973). Models. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
89. Weimers-Jennings, N. J. (1990). Transformation and accommodation: A case study of Joe Scott. Educational Evaluation and Policy, 12, 281-292.
90. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
92. Wilson, M., & Goldenberg, M. P. (1998). Some conceptions are difficult to change: One middle school mathematics teacher's struggle. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 269-293.
93. Wilson, M., & Lloyd, G. M. (2000). Sharing mathematical authority with students: The challenge for high school teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 75(2), 146-169.
94. Wilson, S. M. (1990). A conflict of interests: The case of Mark Black. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 293-310.
95. Wilson, S. M. (2003). California dreaming: Reforming mathematics education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
96. Yinger, R. (1987, April). By the seat of your pants: An inquiry into improvisation and teaching. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
97. Yinger, R. (1988, May). The conversation of teaching: Patterns of explanation in mathematics lessons. Paper presented at the International Study Association on Teacher Thinking, Nottingham, England.