Teachers' use of curriculum materials: An emerging field

Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 3-14

  Lloyd, Gwendolyn M ^a,e   Remillard, Janine T ^b,d,e   Herbel Eisenmann, Beth A ^c,e  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MetroMath The Center for Mathematics   (United States)

^e Center for the Study of Mathematics Curriculum   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960651916     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203884645     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Archer, J. (2005). Guiding hand. Education Week, 25(3), S5-S10.
2. Australian Education Council (1990). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Canberra: Curriculum Corporation.
3. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171-200). Westport, CT: Ablex.
4. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd Edition) (pp. 255-296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
5. Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers' learning. Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287-311.
6. Donovan, B. F. (1983). Power and curriculum in implementation: A case study of an innovative mathematics program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
7. Durkin, D. (1983). Is there a match between what elementary teachers do and what basal manuals recommend? (Tech. Rep. No. 44). Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
8. FitzGerald, F. (1979). America revised. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
9. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Lubienski, S. T., & Id-Deen, L. (2006). Reconsidering the study of mathematics instructional practices: The importance of curricular context in understanding local and global teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 313-345.
10. Holland, D., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (2001). History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
11. Keiser, J. M., & Lambdin, D. V. (1996). The clock is ticking: Time constraint issues in mathematics teaching reform. Journal of Educational Research, 90(1), 23-30.
12. Komoski, P. K. (1977). Instructional materials will not improve until we change the system. Educational Leadership, 42, 31-37.
13. Kuhs, T. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1979). The potential influence of textbooks on teachers' selection of content for elementary school mathematics (Research Series No. 48). East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching.
14. Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers' conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(3), 227-252.
15. Lloyd, G. M. (2006). Using K-12 mathematics curriculum materials in preservice teacher education:Rationale, strategies, and teachers' experiences. In K. Lynch-Davis, & R. L. Rider (Eds.), The work of mathematics teacher educators: Continuing the conversation (vol. 3, AMTE monograph series, pp. 11-27). San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
16. Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (2000). Implementing mathematics reform: The challenge within. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 1-34.
17. Ministry of Education. (1992). Mathematics in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
19. National Research Council. (2004). On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations. Committee for a Review of the Evaluation Data on the Effectiveness of NSF-Supported and Commercially Generated Mathematics Curriculum Materials. J. Confrey & V. Stohl (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
20. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
21. Office for Standards in Education. (1994). Science and mathematics in schools: A review. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
22. Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350.
23. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
24. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13-25.
25. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Spillane, J. P. (2000). A fifth-grade teacher's reconstruction of mathematics and literacy teaching:Exploring interactions among identity, learning, and subject matter. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 307-330.
27. Stake, R. E., & Easley, J. (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
28. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488.
29. Stein, M. K., Remillard, J. T., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319-369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
30. Stephens, W. M. (1982). Mathematical knowledge and school work: A case study of the teaching of developing mathematical processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
31. Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 105-127.
32. Van Zoest, L. R., & Bohl, J. V. (2002). The role of reform curricular materials in an internship: The case of Alice and Gregory. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), 265-288.
33. Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp.173-210). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.