The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modelling reading aloud

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 836-860

  Zorzi, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computational modelling; Connectionist models; Neural networks; Reading aloud; Word naming

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CONNECTIONIST DUAL PROCESS; HUMAN; LEARNING; MENTAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; READING; REVIEW; SIMULATION; THEORETICAL MODEL; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 77954990040     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440903435621     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Adelman, J. S., & Brown, G. D. A. (2008). Methods of testing and diagnosing model error: Dual and single route cascaded models of reading aloud. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 524-544.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, D. S., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283-316.
4. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 445-459.
5. Besner, D., & Roberts, M. A. (2003). Reading nonwords aloud: Results requiring change in the dual route cascaded model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 398-404.
6. Brown, P., & Besner, D. (1987). The assembly of phonology in oral reading: A new model. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 471-489). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
7. Bullinaria, J. A., & Chater, N. (1995). Connectionist modelling: implications for cognitive neuropsychology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 227-264.
8. Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243-297.
9. Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59-85.
10. Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5 pp. 1-82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991-1060.
12. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). London: Academic Press.
13. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
14. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
15. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
16. Cotelli, M., Abutalebi, J., Zorzi, M., & Cappa, S. F. (2003). Vowels in the buffer: A case study of acquired dysgraphia with selective vowel substitutions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 99-114.
17. Davis, C. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
18. Davis, C. J. (2010). SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 695-724.
19. Denes, F., Cipolotti, L., & Zorzi, M. (1999). Acquired dyslexias and dysgraphias. In G. Denes & L. Pizzamiglio (Eds.), Handbook of clinical and experimental neuropsychology (pp. 289-317). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
20. Diependale, K., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2010). Fast phonology and the Bimodal Interactive Activation Model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 764-778.
21. Dufau, S., Lete, B., Touzet, C., Glotin, H., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2010). A developmental perspective on visual word recognition: New evidence and a self-organising model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 669-694.
22. Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Ruffino, M., Lorusso, M. L., Cattaneo, C., Galli, R., et al. (2010). Multi-sensory spatial attention deficits are predictive of phonological decoding skills in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1011-1025.
23. Facoetti, A., Zorzi, M., Cestnick, L., Lorusso, M. L., Molteni, M., Paganoni, P., et al. (2006). The relationship between visuo-spatial attention and nonword reading in developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 841-855.
24. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-600.
25. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.
26. Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 128-156.
27. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
28. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1 -24). New York: Nova Science.
29. Hall, T. A. (2006). English syllabification as the interaction of markedness constraints. Studia Linguistica, 60, 1-33.
30. Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
31. Harm, W. M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
32. Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 115-162.
33. Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Wimmer, H., & Zorzi, M. (2004). Do current connec- tionist learning models account for reading development in different languages? Cognition, 91, 273-296.
34. Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 723-750.
35. Kello, C. T. (2006). Considering the junction model of lexical processing. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing. Sydney: Psychology Press.
36. Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organizing formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43, 59-69.
37. Ladavas, E., Shallice, T., & Zanella, M. T. (1997). Preserved semantic access in neglect dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 35, 257-270.
38. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
39. Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 203-208.
40. Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.
41. Martensen, H., Maris, E., & Dijkstra, T. (2003). Phonological ambiguity and context sensitivity: On sublexical clustering in visual word recognition. Journal ofMemory and Language, 49, 375-395.
42. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
43. O'Malley, S., & Besner, D. (2008). Reading aloud: Qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1400-1411.
44. Page, M. (2000). Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 443-467.
45. Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 335-359). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
46. Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F., Menoncello, L., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S., et al. (2000). A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 91-96.
47. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., Braun, M., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Rules versus statistics in reading aloud: New evidence on an old debate. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 798-812.
48. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
49. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (in press). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP + +) model. Cognitive Psychology.
50. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domain. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
51. Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97-145.
52. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 277-282.
53. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482-503.
54. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342-364.
55. Rey, A., Courrieu, P., Schmidt-Weigand, F., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Item performance in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 600-608.
56. Rey, A., & Schiller, N. O. (2005). Graphemic complexity and multiple print-to-sound associations in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 33, 76-85.
57. Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75, B1-B12.
58. Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2006). Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is needed to generate a phonological code. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1303-1323.
59. Roberts, M. A., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Besner, D. (2003). When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 405-414.
60. Rosenblatt, F. (1962). Principles of neurodynamics. New York: Spartan.
61. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol.1. Foundations (pp. 318-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effects and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
63. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
64. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
65. Shibahara, N., Zorzi, M., Hill, M., Wydell, T., & Butterworth, B. (2003). Semantic effects in word naming: Evidence from English and Japanese Kanji. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 263-286.
66. Sibley, D. E., Kello, C. T., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2010). A connectionist model of monosyllabic and bisyllabic naming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 650-668.
67. Siegel, S., & Allan, L. G. (1996). The widespread influence of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 314-321.
68. Sieroff, E., Pollatsek, A., & Posner, M. (1988). Recognition of visual letter strings following injury to the posterior visual spatial attention system. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 427-449.
69. Sieroff, E., & Posner, M. (1988). Cueing spatial attention during processing of words and letters strings in normals. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 451-472.
70. Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411-416.
71. Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1140-1154.
72. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction. Psychological Review, 88, 135-170.
73. Thomas, M. S. C., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 727-788.
74. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
75. Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439-456.
76. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243.
77. Widrow, G., & Hoff, M. E. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. In Western electronic show and convention record (Pt. 4, pp. 96-104). Institute of Radio Engineers.
78. Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 502-529.
79. Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tooth, D., Csepe, V., Reis, A., Faisca, L., et al. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21 , 551-559.
80. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2009). Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: No challenge for CDP+. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 35, 306-311.
81. Zorzi, M. (1999). The connectionist dual-process model: Development, skilled performance, and breakdowns of processing in oral reading. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Trieste, Italy.
82. Zorzi, M. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 847-856.
83. Zorzi, M. (2005). Computational models of reading. In G. Houghton (Ed.), Connectionist models in cognitive psychology (pp. 403-444). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
84. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998a). The development of spelling-sound relationships in a model of phonological reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 337-371. (Pubitemid 128469229)
85. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998b). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131-1161.
86. Zorzi, M., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Category-specific deficits in a self- organizing model of the lexical-semantic system. In D. Heinke, G. W. Humphreys, & A. Olson (Eds.), Connectionist models in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 137-148). London: Springer-Verlag.