A study of relative-position priming with superset primes

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 399-415

  Van Assche, Eva ^a,d   Grainger, Jonathan ^b,c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^d AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Letter position; Orthographic processing; Reading; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 33645744626     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.399     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a "hat" in "that"? Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 131-143.
2. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. (1990). Levels of representation, coordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 391-445.
3. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
4. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOIAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
5. Davis, C. J. (2006). The SOLAR (Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition & Recognition) Model of Visual Word Identification, Part I: Orthographic Input Coding and Lexical Matching. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 923-941.
7. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335-341.
8. De Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159-162.
9. Dunnett, C. W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 1096-1121.
10. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
11. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and language, 30, 1-25.
12. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211-251.
13. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavioral Research Methods: Instruments and Computers, 35, 116-124.
14. Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. (in press). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
15. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 2-23). New York: Nova Science.
16. Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
17. Grossberg, S. (1978). A theory of human memory: Self-organization and performance of sensory-motor codes, maps, and plans. In R. Rosen & F. Snell (Eds.), Progress in theoretical biology (pp. 233-374). New York: Academic Press.
18. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
19. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological. Review, 88, 375-407.
20. Mozer, M. (1987). Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 83-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
22. Perea, M., Gómez, P., & Ratcliff, R. (2003). A model of encoding letter positions: The overlap model. Paper presented at the 12th annual Congress of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Granada, Spain.
23. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
24. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
25. Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 691-706.
26. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
27. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
28. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, A., Grainger, J., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 96-101.
29. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 249-255.