Reading in hebrew versus reading in english: Is there a qualitative difference?

How Children Learn to Read: Current Issues and New Directions in the Integration of Cognition, Neurobiology and Genetics of Reading and Dyslexia Research and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 235-254

  Frost, Ram ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920664114     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203838006     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Badecker, W., & Allen, M. (2002). Morphological parsing and the perception of lexical identity: A masked priming study of stem homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 125–144.
2. Brysbaert, M., & Rastle, K. (2009). Are form priming and morphological priming different for Hebrew than for Indo-European languages? Not if you look at the evidence. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Memory & Cognition, 28, 143–153.
4. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the mental lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). London: Academic Press.
5. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Zeigler, J. (2001). A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
6. Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668–687.
7. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1238–1255.
8. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Peleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415–422.
9. Deutsch A, Frost, R., Pollatsek A., & Rayner, K. (2000). Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 487–506.
10. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341–371.
11. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 75–114.
12. Ellis, A. W., & Young, A. W. (1988). Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68, 33–39.
14. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353–372.
15. Forster, K. I. (1999). The microgenesis of priming effect in lexical access. Brain and Language, 68, 5–15.
16. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698.
17. Forster, K. I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 844–863.
18. Friedmann, N., & Gvion, A. (2001). Letter position dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(8), 673–696.
19. Friedmann, N., & Gvion, A. (2005). Letter form as a constraint for errors in neglect dyslexia and letter position dyslexia. Behavioral Neurology, 16(2-3), 145–158.
20. Friedmann, N., & Rahamim, E. (2007). Developmental letter position dyslexia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 1, 201-236.
21. Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: Evidence from a deep and a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 116–129.
22. Frost, R. (1995). Phonological computation and missing vowels: Mapping lexical involvement in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 398–408.
23. Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71–99.
24. Frost, R. (2006). Becoming literate in Hebrew: The grain-size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science, 9(5), 439–444.
25. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2000). Decomposing complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 751–765.
26. Frost, R., Deutsch, A, Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1277–1288.
27. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829–856.
28. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104–115.
29. Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organisation in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1293–1326.
30. Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1–23). New York: Nova Science.
31. Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed words as a whole? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58–59.
32. Henderson, J. M., Dixon, P., Peterson, A., Twilley, L. C., & Ferreira, F. (1995). Evidence for the use of phonological representation during transaccadic word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 82–97.
33. Holyk, G. G., & Pexman, P. M. (2004). The elusive nature of early phonological priming effects: Are there individual differences? Brain and Language, 90, 353–367.
34. Inhoff, A. W. (1989). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 544–555.
35. Kambe, G. (2004). Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(2), 279–292.
36. Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). Reading in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Holland: Elsevier.
37. Lima, S. D. (1987). Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 84–99.
38. Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Halle, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334.
39. Lupker, S., & Perea, M. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97–120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
40. Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: Psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(3), 175–199.
41. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
42. Ornan, U. (2003). The final word: Mechanism for Hebrew word deneration [in Hebrew]. Haifa, Israel: Haifa University Press.
43. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does judge activate court? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 829–841.
44. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246.
45. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighbourhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 668–677.
46. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148–162.
47. Potter, M. C. (1984). Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 91–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Reading morphologically-complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279–305). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
49. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (in press). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes.
50. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morphoorthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098.
51. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.
52. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
53. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2007, June). Does morphological processing in the parafovea influence eye movements in reading? Paper presented at the 5th workshop on morphological processing, Marseille, France.
54. Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206–226.
55. Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537–550.
56. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettrs: There’s a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192–193.
57. Rueckl, J. (2002). The dynamics of visual word recognition. Ecological Psychology, 14, 5–19.
58. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.
59. Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65–76.
60. Seidenberg, M. S., MacDonald, M. C., & Saffran, J. R. (2003). Are there limits to statistical learning? Science, 300, 51–52.
61. Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1977). The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 15(1), 31–41.
62. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 96–101.
63. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University vs. Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913–918.
64. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–243.
65. Ziegler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart’s neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68, 53–62.