Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?

Cognition

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 141-156

  Velan, Hadas ^a   Frost, Ram ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Form priming; Letter transpositions; Morphological processing; Orthographic processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION; WRITING;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 78651079794     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Berman R.A. Modern Hebrew structure 1978, University Publishing Projects, Tel Aviv.
2. Chateau D., Jared D. Exposure to print and word recognition. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:143-153.
3. Christianson K., Johnson R.L., Rayner K.I. Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1327-1339.
4. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
5. Crepaldi D., Rastle K., Coltheart M., Nickels L. 'Fell' primes 'fall', but does 'bell' prime 'ball'? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 63:83-99.
6. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (solar) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New South Wales.
7. Davis C.J., Lupker S.J. Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(3):668-687.
8. Deutsch A., Frost R., Peleg S., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2003, 10:415-422.
9. Deutsch A., Frost R., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:487-506.
10. Deutsch A., Frost R., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes 2005, 20:341-371.
11. Dishon-Berkovitz M., Elgom D. The Stroop effect: It is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:1437-1439.
12. Duñabeitia J.A., Perea M., Carreiras M. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for ortho-morphological decomposition. Cognition 2007, 105:691-703.
13. Feldman L.B., Frost R., Pnini T. Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:947-960.
14. Ferrand L., Grainger J. Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1994, 47A:365-382.
15. Forster K.I. The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language 1999, 68(1-2):5-15.
16. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in Lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1984, 10:680-698.
17. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003, 25:116-124.
18. Forster K.I., Taft M. Bodies, antibodies and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:844-863.
19. Friedmann N., Gvion A. Letter position dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2001, 18(8):673-696.
20. Friedmann N., Gvion A. Letter form as a constraint for errors in neglect dyslexia and letter position dyslexia. Behavioural Neurology 2005, 16(2-3):145-158.
21. Frost R. Becoming literate in Hebrew: The grain-size hypothesis and semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science 2006, 9(5):439-440.
22. Frost R. Reading in Hebrew vs. reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference?. How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice 2009, 235-254. Psychology Press. K. Pugh, P. McCradle (Eds.).
23. Frost R., Deutsch A., Forster K.I. Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:751-765.
24. Frost R., Deutsch A., Gilboa O., Tannenbaum M., Marslen-Wilson W. Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:1277-1288.
25. Frost R., Forster K.I., Deutsch A. What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:829-856.
26. Frost R., Katz L., Bentin S. Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13:104-115.
27. Frost R., Kugler T., Deutsch A., Forster K.I. Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1293-1326.
28. Frost, R., & Plaut, D.C. (2005). The word-frequency database for printed Hebrew. Available from http://word-freq.mscc.huji.ac.il/index.html.
29. Glinert L. The grammar of modern Hebrew 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
30. Gomez P., Ratcliff R., Perea M. The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review 2008, 115(3):577-601.
31. Grainger J. Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:1-35.
32. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565.
33. Grainger J., Van Heuven W. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. The mental lexicon 2003, 1-24. Nova Science, New York. P. Bonin (Ed.).
34. Grainger J., Whitney C. Does the human mind read words as a whole?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:58-59.
35. Guerrera C., Forster K.I. Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:117-142.
36. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Reading acquisition, phonology, and dyslexia: Insights from a connectionist model. Psychological Review 1999, 106:491-528.
37. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 2004, 111:662-720.
38. Holyk G.G., Pexman P.M. The elusive nature of early phonological priming effects: Are there individual differences?. Brain and Language 2004, 267-353.
39. Kinoshita S., Norris D. Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1-18.
40. Longtin C.M., Meunier F. Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53:26-41.
41. Lupker S.J., Perea M., Davis C.J. Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:93-116.
42. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
43. Medler, D.A., & Binder, J.R. (2005). MCWord: An on-line ortho-graphic database of the English language. Available from http://www.neuro.mcw.edu/mcword/.
44. Norris D. The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review 2006, 113:327-357.
45. Norris D., Kinoshita S. Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137(3):434-455.
46. Norris D., Kinoshita S., van Casteren M. A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 62:254-271.
47. Perea M., Abu Mallouh R., Carreiras M. The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2010, 17:375-380.
48. Perea M., Carreiras M. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1600-1613.
49. Perea M., Carreiras M. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53:308-315.
50. Perea M., Carreiras M. Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect?. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:69-92.
51. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. Masked priming: The state of the art 2003, 97-120. Psychology Press, New York. S. Kinoshita, S.J. Lupker (Eds.).
52. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Does judge activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:829-841.
53. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:231-246.
54. Perea M., Perez E. Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009, 24:67-88.
55. Perea M., Rosa E. Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a short stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2000, 7:668-677.
56. Perry C., Ziegler J.C., Zorzi M. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 2007, 114:273-315.
57. Plaut D.C., Gonnerman L.M. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15(4/5):445-485.
58. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1996, 103:56-115.
59. Rastle K., Davis M.H. Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:942-971.
60. Rastle K., Davis M.H., New B. The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004, 11:1090-1098.
61. Rayner K., White S.J., Johnson R.L., Liversedge S.P. Reading words with jumbled letters: There's a cost. Psychological Science 2006, 17:192-193.
62. Rueckl J. The dynamics of visual word recognition. Ecological Psychology 2002, 14:5-19.
63. Schoonbaert S., Grainger J. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes 2004, 19:333-367.
64. Segui J., Grainger J. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16(1):65-76.
65. Share D.L. On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an " outlier" orthography. Psychological Bulletin 2008, 134:584-615.
66. Van Heuven W.J.B., Dijkstra T., Grainger J., Schriefers H. Shared neighborhood effect in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:96-101.
67. Velan H., Frost R. Cambridge University Vs. Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007, 14:913-918.
68. Velan H., Frost R. Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 61:285-302.
69. Velan H., Frost R., Deutsch A., Plaut D. The processing of root morphemes in Hebrew: Contrasting localist and distributed accounts. Language and Cognitive Processes 2005, 29:169-206.
70. Whitney C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:221-243.
71. Whitney C. Supporting the serial in the SERIOL model. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:824-865.
72. Ziegler J.C., Goswami U.C. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131(1):3-29.
73. Zorzi M., Houghton G., Butterworth B. Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1131-1161.