Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 54-63

  Welvaert, Marijke ^a   Farioli, Fernand ^b   Grainger, Jonathan ^b,c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Letter position; Orthographic priming; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; READING; REVERSAL LEARNING; SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 40549115630     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.1.54     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775-800.
2. Chambers, S.M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225-241.
3. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
4. Davis, C.J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
5. Davis, C.J., & Bowers, J.S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 923-941.
6. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335-341.
7. Dunnett, C.W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 1096-1121.
8. Forster, K.I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203-233.
9. Forster, K.I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
10. Forster, K.I., & Forster, J. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavioral Research Methods: Instruments and Computers, 35, 116-124.
11. Grainger, J., Granier, J.P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884.
12. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
13. Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1-24). New York: Nova Science.
14. Humphreys G.W., Evett, L.J., & Quinlan, P.T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
15. McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
16. Mozer, M.C. (1983). Letter migration in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 9, 913-916.
17. Mozer, M.C. (1987). Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 83-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. New B., Pallier C., Ferrand L., & Matos R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE [A lexical database of contemporary French on the internet: LEXIQUE]. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
19. Perea, M., & Lupker, S.J. (2004). Can caniso activate casino? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
20. Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 691-706.
21. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
22. Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
23. Van Assche, E., & Grainger, J. (2006). A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 399-415.
24. Welvaert, M., Granier, J.P., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2006). Effects of removing, inserting, and substituting letters in masked form priming. Manuscript in preparation.
25. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain codes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243.