Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 106-151

  Perry, Conrad ^a   Ziegler, Johannes C ^b   Zorzi, Marco ^c  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computational modeling; Disyllables; Reading aloud; Word stress

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; READING; SPEECH;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SPEECH; VOCABULARY;

EID: 77954971626     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, London.
2. Álvarez C.J., Carreiras M., Taft M. Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 28:545-555.
3. Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:802-814.
4. Andrews S., Scarratt D.R. Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: Hough Dou Peapel Rede Gnew Wirds?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 53:567-593.
5. Ans B., Carbonnel S., Valdois S. A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review 1998, 678-723.
6. Arciuli J., Cupples L. Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification. Language and Speech 2003, 353-374.
7. Arciuli J., Cupples L. The processing of lexical stress in word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:920-948.
8. Ashby J., Clifton C.J. The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements in silent reading. Cognition 2005, 96:B89-B100.
9. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM): Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
10. Balota D., Cortese M.J., Sergent-Marshall D.S., Spieler D.H., Yap M.J. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:283-316.
11. Balota D.A., Spieler D. The utility of item-level analysis in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science 1998, 9:238-240.
12. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Hutchison K.A., Kessler B., Loftis B., et al. The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:445-459.
13. Becker S., Behrmann M., Moscovitch M., Joordens S. Long-term semantic priming: A computational account and empirical evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 1997, 23:1059-1082.
14. Behrmann M., Bub D. Surface dyslexia and dysgraphia: Dual routes, single lexicon. Cognition Neuropsychology 1992, 9:209-251.
15. Besner D., Twilley R.S., McCann R.S., Seergobin K. On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary?. Psychological Review 1990, 97:432-446.
16. Brown P., Lupker S.J., Colombo L. Interacting sources of information in word naming: A study of individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:537-554.
17. Bullinaria J.A. Modelling reading, spelling and past tense learning with artificial neural networks. Brain and Language 1997, 59:236-266.
18. Burzio L. Principles of English stress 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Butler B., Hains S. Individual differences in word recognition latency. Memory and Cognition 1979, 7:68-76.
20. Chateau D., Jared D. Spelling-sound consistency effects in disyllabic word naming. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:255-280.
21. Chen H.C., Vaid J. Word frequency modulates the Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) effect in English polysyllable word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2007, 22:58-82.
22. Colombo L. Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:987-1003.
23. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J., Besner D. Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and performance VI 1977, 535-555. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Domic (Ed.).
24. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J.C. DRC: A computational model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
25. Content A. The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French. Psychological Research 1991, 53:3-12.
26. Davis C.J., Bowers J.S. Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:535-557.
27. Dupoux E., Pallier C., Sebastian-Galles N., Mehler J. A distressing "deafness" in French?. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 36:406-421.
28. Feldman-Stewart D., Mewhort D.J.K. Learning in small connectionist networks does not generalize to large networks. Psychological Research 1994, 56:99-103.
29. Ferrand L. Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: The syllabic length effect reexamined. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:142-148.
30. Ferrand L., New B. Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica 2003, 113:167-183.
31. Flemming E., Johnson S. Rosa's roses: Reduced vowels in American English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2007, 37:83-96.
32. Forster K.I., Davis C. The density constraint of form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:1-25.
33. Fudge E. English word stress 1984, George Allen and Unwin, London.
34. Garde, P. (1968). L'Accent. Paris: Presses Univ. France.
35. Glushko R.J. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1979, 5:674-691.
36. Gordon M.K. Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, typology 2006, Routledge, New York.
37. Goswami U. Phonology, reading development, and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia 2002, 52:139-163.
38. Goswami U., Ziegler J.C. A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:142-143.
39. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565.
40. Gupta P., Touretzky D. Connectionist models and linguistic theory: Investigations of stress systems in language. Cognitive Science 1994, 18:1-50.
41. Hall T.A. Against extrasyllabic consonants in German and English. Phonology 2002, 19:33-75.
42. Hall T.A. English syllabification as the interaction of markedness constraints. Studia Linguistica 2006, 60:1-33.
43. Halle M., Idsardi W.J. r, Hypercorrection, and the elsewhere condition. Derivations and constraints in phonology 1997, 331-348. Clarendon Press, Oxford. I. Roca (Ed.).
44. Hammond M. Vowel quantity and syllabification in English. Language 1997, 73:1-17.
45. Hammond M. The phonology of English. A prosodic optimality-theoretic approach 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
46. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 2004, 111:662-720.
47. Harris J. English sound structure 1994, Blackwell, Oxford.
48. Hayes B. Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies 1995, University of Chicago Press.
49. Heselwood B. Schwa and the phonotactics of RP English. Transactions of the Philological Society 2007, 105:148-187.
50. Heselwood B. R vocalisation, linking R and intrusive R: Accounting for final schwa in RP English. Transactions of the Philological Society 2009, 107:66-97.
51. Houghton G., Zorzi M. Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20:115-162.
52. Hutzler F., Ziegler J.C., Perry C., Wimmer H., Zorzi M. Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages?. Cognition 2004, 91:273-296.
53. Jacobs A.M., Grainger J. Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1311-1334.
54. Jared D. Spelling-sound consistency affect the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 36:505-529.
55. Jared D. Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:723-750.
56. Jared D., Seidenberg M.S. Naming of multisyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:92-105.
57. Jensen J.T. Against ambisyllabicity. Phonology 2000, 17:187-235.
58. Kawamoto A.H., Zemblidge J.H. Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory and Language 1992, 31:349-374.
59. Kello C.T. Considering the junction model of lexical processing. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing 2006, Taylor and Francis, New York. S. Andrews (Ed.).
60. Kelly M.H. Word onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:231-244.
61. Kelly M.H., Morris J., Verrekia L. Orthographic cues to lexical stress: Effects on naming and lexical decision. Memory and Cognition 1998, 26:822-832.
62. Kessler B., Treiman R., Mullenix J. Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 47:145-171.
63. Ladefoged P. A course in phonetics 2001, Heinle and Heinle, Boston, MA. 4th ed.
64. Lloyd, S., & Wenham, S. (2000). The phonics handbook: In print letters (jolly phonics). Essex: Jolly Learning Ltd.
65. Lund K., Burgess C. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 1996, 28:203-208.
66. Lupker S.J., Brown P., Colombo L. Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 1997, 23:570-590.
67. Lupker S.J., Perea M., Davis C.J. Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:93-116.
68. McCann R., Besner D. Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13:14-24.
69. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88(5):375-407.
70. Miceli G., Caramazza A. The assignment of word stress in oral reading: Evidence from a case of acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1993, 10:273-295.
71. Monsell S., Doyle M.C., Haggard P.N. Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118:43-71.
72. Mulatti C., Reynolds M.G., Besner D. Neighborhood effects in reading aloud: new findings and new challenges for computational models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:799-810.
73. Paap K.R., Noel R.W. Dual route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research 1991, 53:13-24.
74. Patterson K., Behrmann M. Frequency and consistency effects in a pure surface dyslexic patient. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:1217-1231.
75. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:231-246.
76. Perry C. Testing a computational account of category specific deficits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11:312-320.
77. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., Braun, M., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Rules versus statistics in reading aloud: New evidence on an old debate. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. doi:10.1080/09541440902978365.
78. Perry C., Ziegler J.C., Zorzi M. Nested modeling and strong inference testing in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 2007, 27:301-333.
79. Plaut D.C. A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: Extension to sequential processing. Cognitive Science 1999, 23:543-568.
80. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1996, 103:56-115.
81. Rastle K., Coltheart M. Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:482-503.
82. Rastle K., Coltheart M. Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 42:342-364.
83. Rastle K., Havelka J., Wydell T.N., Coltheart M., Besner D. Cross-script length effect: Further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2009, 35:238-246.
84. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: Twenty years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
85. Rey A., Courrieu P., Schmidt-Weigand F., Jacobs A.M. Item performance in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2009, 16:600-608.
86. Roach P. English phonetics and phonology 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 3rd ed.
87. Roberts M.A., Rastle K., Coltheart M., Besner D. When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2003, 10:405-414.
88. Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: L earning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:922-939.
89. Seidenberg, M. S., & Waters, G. S. (1989). Word recognition and naming: A mega study [Abstract]. Paper presented at the Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society.
90. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568.
91. Seidenberg M.S., Plaut D.C., Petersen A.S., McClelland J., McCrae K. Nonword pronunciation and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1177-1196.
92. Selkirk E. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 1980, 11:563-605.
93. Ševa N., Monaghan P., Arciuli J. Stressing what is important: Orthographic cues and lexical stress assignment. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2009, 22:237-249.
94. Share D.L. Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 1995, 55:151-218.
95. Sibley D.E., Kello C.T., Seidenberg M.S. A connectionist model of monosyllabic and bisyllabic naming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2010, 22(5). 10.1080/09541440903080583.
96. Siegel S., Allan L.G. The widespread influence of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1996, 3:314-321.
97. Spieler D.H., Balota D. Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science 1997, 8:411-416.
98. Sutton R.S., Barto A.G. Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction. Psychological Review 1981, 88:135-170.
99. Taft M. Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllable Structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:21-39.
100. Taft M. Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech 2001, 44:351-376.
101. Taraban R., McClelland J.L. Consistency effects in word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 1987, 26:608-631.
102. Treiman R., Mullennix J., Bijeljac-Babic R., Richmond-Welty E.D. The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:107-136.
103. Treiman R., Zukowski A. Children's sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes, and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1996, 61:193-215.
104. van Oostendorp M. Schwa in phonological theory. GLOT 1998, 3.5:3-9.
105. Waese, M., & Jared, D. (2006). The role of intervocalic consonants in disyllabic word naming. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Houston, Texas.
106. Wagenmakers E., Ratcliff R., Gomez P., McKoon G. A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:140-159.
107. Weekes B.S. Differential effects of number of letters on words and nonword naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1997, 50(A):439-456.
108. Widrow G., Hoff M.E. Adaptive switching circuits. Institute of radio engineers, western electronic show and convention record, part 4 1960, 96-104. Institute of Radio Engineers, New York.
109. Yap M.J., Balota D.A. Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 60:502-529.
110. Yarkoni T., Balota D.A., Yap M.J. Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A New Measure of Orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:971-979.
111. Yates M. Phonological neighbors in visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1385-1397.
112. Zevin J., Joanisse M. Stress assignment in nonword reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 41B:S5.
113. Zevin J.D., Seidenberg M.S. Simulating consistency effects and individual differences in nonword naming. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54:145-160.
114. Ziegler J.C., Besson M., Jacobs A.M., Nazir T.A., Carr T.H. Word, pseudoword, and nonword processing: A multitask comparison using event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9:758-775.
115. Ziegler J.C., Castel C., Pech-Georgel C., George F., Alario F.-X., Perry C. Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition 2008, 107:151-178.
116. Ziegler J., Goswami U.C. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131:3-29.
117. Ziegler J.C., Perry C., Coltheart M. Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2003, 10:947-953.
118. Ziegler J.C., Perry C., Jacobs A.M., Braun M. Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science 2001, 12:379-384.
119. Ziegler J.C., Perry C., Zorzi M. Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: No challenge for CDP+. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2009, 35:306-311.
120. Ziegler J.C., Stone G.O., Jacobs A.M. The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1997, 29:600-618.
121. Zorzi M. Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:847-856.
122. Zorzi M. The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modeling reading aloud. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2010, 22(5). 10.1080/09541440903435621.
123. Zorzi M., Houghton G., Butterworth B. The development of spelling-sound relationships in a model of phonological reading. Language & Cognitive Processes 1998, 13:337-371.
124. Zorzi M., Houghton G., Butterworth B. Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1131-1161.