The spatial coding model of visual word identification

Psychological Review

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 713-758

  Davis, Colin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Masked priming; Models; Orthographic input coding; Spatial coding model; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; READING; RECOGNITION;

COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 77955324838     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019738     Document Type: Article

References (162)

1. Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:802-814.
2. Andrews S. Neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:234-254.
3. Andrews S. Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language 1996, 35:775-800.
4. Andrews S. All about words: A lexicalist perspective on reading. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing 2006, 318-348. Psychology Press, New York, NY. S. Andrews (Ed.).
5. Andrews S., Heathcote A. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: A matter of some moment?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:514-540.
6. Averbach E., Coriell A.S. Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal 1961, 40:309-328.
7. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM] 1995, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
8. Balota D.A., Cortese M.J., Sergent-Marshall S.D., Spieler D.H., Yap M.J. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 133:283-316.
9. Balota D.A., Spieler D.H. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 1999, 128:32-55.
10. Balota D.A., Yap M.J. Attentional control and flexible lexical processing: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing 2006, 229-258. Psychology Press, New York, NY. S. Andrews (Ed.).
11. Besner D., Twilley L., McCann R.S., Seergobin K. On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary?. Psychological Review 1990, 97:432-446.
12. Bowers J.S. Challenging the widespread assumption that connectionism and distributed representations go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 45:413-445.
13. Bowers J.S. On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: Implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Review 2009, 116:220-251.
14. Bowers, J. S. (in press). Does masked and unmasked priming reflect Bayesian inference as implemented in the Bayesian Reader? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
15. Bowers J.S., Damian M.F., Davis C.J. A fundamental limitation of conjunctive codes in PDP models of cognition: Comments on Botvinick and Plaut (2006). Psychological Review 2009, 116:986-995.
16. Bowers J.S., Davis C.J. Is speech perception modular or interactive?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:3-5.
17. Bowers J.S., Davis C.J., Hanley D.A. Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a " hat" in " that" ?. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:131-143.
18. Bowers J.S., Davis C.J., Hanley D.A. Interfering neighbors: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words. Cognition 2005, 97:B45-B54.
19. Bowers J.S., Davis C.J. Learning representations of wordforms with recurrent networks: Comment on Sibley, Kello, Plaut, & Elman. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:1183-1186.
20. Bradski G., Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S. STORE working memory networks for storage and recall or arbitrary temporal sequences. Biological Cybernetics 1994, 71:469-480.
21. Bruner J.S., O'Dowd D. A note on the informativeness of parts of words. Language and Speech 1958, 1:98-101.
22. Brysbaert M., Ghyselinck M. The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency-related, partly frequency-independent. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:992-1011.
23. Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S. A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 1987, 37:54-115.
24. Carr T.H., Pollatsek A. Models of word recognition. Reading research: Advances in theory and practice 1985, 5:2-76. Academic Press, New York, NY. D. Besner, T.G. Waller, G.E. MacKinnon (Eds.).
25. Chambers S.M. Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:225-241.
26. Christianson K., Johnson R.L., Rayner K. Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1327-1339.
27. Chung S.T.L., Legge G.E. Precision of position signals for letters. Vision Research 2009, 49:1948-1960.
28. Coltheart M. Are there lexicons?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 57A:1153-1171.
29. Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., Haller M. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review 1993, 100:589-608.
30. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J.T., Besner D. Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and performance VI 1977, 535-555. Academic Press, New York, NY. S. Dornic (Ed.).
31. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
32. Cortese M.J., Fugett A. Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 2004, 36:384-387.
33. Cortese M.J., Khanna M.M. Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:1072-1082.
34. Cortese M.J., Khanna M.M. Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:791-794.
35. Courrieu P., Farioli F., Grainger J. Inverse discrimination time as a perceptual distance for alphabetic characters. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:901-919.
36. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2010). Identification is position-invariant for stem morphemes, but not affixes. Manuscript in preparation.
37. Davelaar E.J. Sequential retrieval and inhibition of parallel (re)activated representations: A neurocomputational comparison of competitive queuing and resampling models. Adaptive Behavior 2007, 15:51-71.
38. Davis C.J. The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition (Doctoral dissertation) 1999, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
39. Davis, C. J. (2001, December). A novel method of parallel matching in neural network models of recognition. Paper presented at the 10th Australasian Mathematical Psychology Conference, Newcastle, Australia.
40. Davis C.J. Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition. Masked priming: The state of the art 2003, 121-170. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA. S. Kinoshita, S.J. Lupker (Eds.).
41. Davis C.J. Phase coding: A method for simultaneously encoding order and signal strength in a neural network model of recognition. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Cognitive and Neural Systems 2004, 21.
42. Davis C.J. N-watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods 2005, 37:65-70.
43. Davis C.J. Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural data and current models. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing 2006, 180-206. Psychology Press. S. Andrews (Ed.).
44. Davis, C. J. (in press). SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
45. Davis C.J., Bowers J.S. What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2004, 30:923-941.
46. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2005, August). How is letter position coded? Further evidence for a spatial coding model. Paper presented at the 14th ESCOP conference, Leiden, the Netherlands.
47. Davis C.J., Bowers J.S. Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:535-557.
48. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2010). Are there neighborhood effects in the lexical decision task? Manuscript in preparation.
49. Davis, C. J., Brysbaert, M., Van Der Haegen, & McCormick, S. F. (2009, August). Computational modelling of visual/anatomical factors affecting letter position coding. Paper presented at the MathPsych Conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
50. Davis C.J., Lupker S.J. Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2006, 32:668-687.
51. Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2010). Masked priming with reversed string primes: Using sandwich priming to contrast two classes of orthographic input coding models. Manuscript submitted for publication.
52. Davis, C. J., McCormick, S. F., Van der Haegen, L., & Brysbaert, M. (2010, January). Factors affecting letter position uncertainty in reading. Paper presented at the meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, London, England.
53. Davis C.J., Perea M., Acha J. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009.
54. Davis C.J., Taft M. More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:904-910.
55. Dehaene S., Cohen L., Sigman M., Vinckier F. The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:335-341.
56. Dilkina K., McClelland J.L., Plaut D.C. A single-system account of semantic and lexical deficits in five semantic dementia patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25:136-164.
57. Duñabeitia J.A., Laka I., Perea M., Carreiras M. Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2009, 21:615-640.
58. Duñabeitia J.A., Perea M., Carreiras M. Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:1002-1020.
59. Estes W.K., Allmeyer D.H., Reder S.M. Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception and Psychophysics 1976, 19:1-15.
60. Farrell S., Lelièvre A. End anchoring in short-term order memory. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 60:209-227.
61. Fiset D., Blais C., Ethier-Majcher C., Arguin M., Bub D., Gosselin F. Features for identification of uppercase and lowercase letters. Psychological Science 2008, 19:1161-1168.
62. Fodor J.A. The language of thought 1975, Thomas Y. Crowell, New York, NY.
63. Forster K.I. Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Advances in psychology 1992, 94:413-434. North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. R. Frost (Ed.).
64. Forster K.I. The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1998, 27:203-233.
65. Forster K.I., Davis C., Schoknecht C., Carter R. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1987, 39:211-251.
66. Forster K.I., Shen D. No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:696-713.
67. Frankish C., Barnes L. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:381-391.
68. Frankish C., Turner E. SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 56:189-211.
69. Glezer L.S., Jiang X., Riesenhuber M. Evidence for highly selective neuronal tuning to whole words in the " visual word form area." Neuron 2009, 62:199-204.
70. Gomez P., Ratcliff R., Perea M. The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review 2008, 115:577-601.
71. Grainger J. Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:1-35.
72. Grainger J., Granier J.P., Farioli F., Van Assche E., van Heuven W.J.B. Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:865-884.
73. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1158-1176.
74. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565.
75. Grainger J., O'Regan J.K., Jacobs A.M., Segui J. On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception and Psychophysics 1989, 45:189-195.
76. Grainger J., van Heuven W. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. The mental lexicon 2003, 1-24. Nova Science, New York, NY. P. Bonin (Ed.).
77. Grainger J., Whitney C. Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:58-59.
78. Grossberg S. Some networks that can learn, remember, and reproduce any number of complicated space-time patterns I. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 1969, 19:53-91.
79. Grossberg S. Contour enhancement, short-term memory, and constancies in reverberating neural networks. Studies in Applied Mathematics 1973, 52:213-257.
80. Grossberg S. Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding: Feedback, expectation, olfaction, and illusions. Biological Cybernetics 1976, 23:187-202.
81. Grossberg S. A theory of human memory: Self-organization and performance of sensory-motor codes, maps, and plans. Progress in theoretical biology 1978, 233-374. Academic Press, New York, NY. R. Rosen, F. Snell (Eds.).
82. Guerrera C., Forster K. Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:117-142.
83. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review 1999, 106:491-528.
84. Hinton J., Liversedge S.P., Underwood G. Neighborhood effects using a partial priming methodology: Guessing or activation?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:1294-1305.
85. Holmes V.M., Ng E. Word-specific knowledge, word-recognition strategies, and spelling ability. Journal of Memory and Language 1993, 32:230-257.
86. Humphreys G.W., Evett L.J., Quinlan P.T. Orthographic Processing in Visual Word Identification. Cognitive Psychology 1990, 22:517-560.
87. Jacobs A.M., Grainger J. Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1174-1188.
88. Jacobs A.M., Grainger J. Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1311-1334.
89. Jacobs A.M., Rey A., Ziegler J.C., Grainger J. MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition 1998, 147-188. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Grainger, A.M. Jacobs (Eds.).
90. Johnson R.L. The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain 2007, 425-440. Elsevier, Oxford, England. R. van Gompel, M. Fisher, W. Murray, R.L. Hill (Eds.).
91. Johnson, R. L., & Dunne, M. D. (2008). Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: Evidence against parafoveal lexical activation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
92. Johnson R.L., Perea M., Rayner K. Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:209-229.
93. Juhasz B.J., Rayner K. Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:1312-1318.
94. Kinoshita S., Norris D. Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 2009, 35:1-18.
95. Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2008). Letter transposition priming in lexical decision reflects noisy order coding: Or why dyslexia is no substitute for dailysex. Manuscript submitted for publication.
96. Lupker S.J., Davis C.J. Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:618-639.
97. Lupker S.J., Perea M., Davis C.J. Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:93-116.
98. McClelland J.L., Mirman D., Holt L.L. Are there interactive processes in speech perception?. Trends in Cognitive Science 2006, 10:363-369.
99. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
100. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises 1988, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
101. Merikle P.M., Coltheart M., Lowe D.G. Selective effects of a patterned masking stimulus. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1971, 25:264-279.
102. Mewhort D.J.K., Campbell A.J. Processing spatial information and selective-masking effect. Perception & Psychophysics 1978, 24:93-101.
103. Monsell S. The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition 1991, 148-197. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. D. Besner, G.W. Humphreys (Eds.).
104. Murray W.S., Forster K.I. Serial mechanisms in lexical access: The rank hypothesis. Psychological Review 2004, 111:721-756.
105. Norris D. The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review 2006, 113:327-357.
106. Norris D. Putting it all together: A unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions. Psychological Review 2009, 116:207-216.
107. Norris D., Kinoshita S. Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:434-455.
108. Norris D., McQueen J.M., Cutler A. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:299-370.
109. O'Connor R.E., Forster K.I. Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition 1981, 9:78-92.
110. Page M.P.A. Modeling the perception of musical sequences with self-organizing neural networks. Connection Science 1994, 6:223-246.
111. Page M.P.A. Connectionist modeling in psychology: A localist manifesto. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:443-467.
112. Page M.P.A., Norris D. The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall. Psychological Review 1998, 105:761-781.
113. Pammer K., Hansen P., Kringelbach M., Holliday I., Barnes G., Hillebrand A., Cornelissen P. Visual word recognition: The first half second. NeuroImage 2004, 22:1819-1825.
114. Pelli D.G., Burns C.W., Farell B., Moore-Page D.C. Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research 2006, 46:4646-4674.
115. Perea M., Carreiras M. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1600-1613.
116. Perea M., Carreiras M. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53:308-315.
117. Perea M., Gotor A. Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming. Cognition 1997, 62:223-240.
118. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:829-841.
119. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. Masked priming: The state of the art 2003, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA. S. Kinoshita, S.J. Lupker (Eds.).
120. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:231-246.
121. Peressotti F., Grainger J. Letter position coding in random consonant arrays. Perception and Psychophysics 1995, 57:875-890.
122. Peressotti F., Grainger J. The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:691-706.
123. Perry C., Ziegler J.C., Zorzi M. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 2007, 114:273-315.
124. Perry J.R., Lupker S.J., Davis C.J. An evaluation of the interactive-activation model using masked partial-word priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:36-68.
125. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1996, 103:56-115.
126. Rastle K. Visual word recognition. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics 2007, 71-87. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. M.G. Gaskell (Ed.).
127. Ratcliff R., Gomez P., McKoon G. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review 2004, 111:159-182.
128. Rayner K. Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception 1979, 8:21-30.
129. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
130. Rayner K., Chace K.H., Slattery T.J., Ashby J. Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 2006, 10:241-255.
131. Rayner K., Pollatsek A. Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading 1987, 327-362. Erlbaum, London, England. M. Coltheart (Ed.).
132. Rayner K., White S.J., Johnson R.L., Liversedge S.P. Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres. Psychological Science 2006, 17:192-193.
133. Reicher G.M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:275-280.
134. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105:125-157.
135. Rubenstein H., Garfield L., Millikan J.A. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1970, 9:487-494.
136. Rubenstein H., Lewis S.S., Rubenstein M.A. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1971, 10:57-62.
137. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review 1982, 89:60-94.
138. Rumelhart D.E., Siple P. Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychological Review 1974, 81:99-118.
139. Schoonbaert S., Grainger J. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes 2004, 19:333-367.
140. Segui J., Grainger J. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:65-76.
141. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568.
142. Sereno S.C., Rayner K. Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:489-493.
143. Sibley D.E., Kello C.T., Plaut D.C., Elman J.L. Sequence encoders enable large-scale lexical modeling: Reply to Bowers and Davis (2009). Cognitive Science 2009, 33:1187-1191.
144. Smith P.T., Jordan T.R., Sharma D. A connectionist model of visual-word recognition that accounts for interactions between mask size and word-length. Psychological Research 1991, 53:80-87.
145. Spieler D.H., Balota D.A. Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science 1997, 8:411-416.
146. Stadthagen-Gonzalez H., Bowers J.S., Damian M.F. Age of acquisition effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from expert vocabularies. Cognition 2004, 93:B11-B26.
147. Stadthagen-Gonzalez H., Davis C.J. The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods 2006, 38:598-605.
148. Stinchcombe, E. J., Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2010). Transposed letter priming effects with masked subset primes: A re-examination of the " relative position priming constraint." Manuscript submitted for publication.
149. Taft M. Reading and the mental lexicon 1991, Erlbaum, London, England.
150. Taft M., van Graan F. Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic judgment task. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:203-224.
151. Tydgat I., Grainger J. Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:480-498.
152. Van Assche E., Grainger J. A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:399-415.
153. Van der Haegen L., Brysbaert M., Davis C.J. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory. Brain and Language 2009, 108:112-121.
154. van Heuven W.J.B., Dijkstra T., Grainger J., Schriefers H. Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:96-101.
155. Welvaert M., Farioli F., Grainger J. Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. Experimental Psychology 2008, 55:54-63.
156. Whaley C.P. Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1978, 17:143-154.
157. White S.J., Johnson R.L., Liversedge S.P., Rayner K. Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1261-1276.
158. Whitney C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:221-243.
159. Whitney C. Investigations into the neural basis of structured representations (Doctoral dissertation) 2004, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
160. Whitney, C., & Grainger, J. (2008). On coding the position of letters in words: A test of two models. Manuscript submitted for publication.
161. Wilson H.R., Cowan J.D. Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysical Journal 1972, 12:1-24.
162. Zorzi M., Houghton G., Butterworth B. Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1131-1161.