SERIOL Reading

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 143-164

  Whitney, Carol ^a   Cornelissen, Piers ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SERIOL MODEL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 38049125787     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960701579771     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adamson, M. M. and Hellige, J. B. (2006) Hemispheric differences for identification of words and nonwords in Urdu-English bilinguals. Neuropsychology, 20, pp. 232-248.
2. Adelman, J. S. and Brown, G. D. A. (2007) The time course of letter position and identity information in visual word identification.
3. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B. and Treiman, R. (2002) The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Washington University, St. Louis
4. Bastiaansen, M. C., van der Linden, M., Keurs, M. Ter, Dijkstra, T. and Hagoot, P. (2005) Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, pp. 530-541.
5. Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N. and Mitchum, C. C. (2005) Orthographic effects in the word substitutions of aphasic patients: An epidemic of right neglect dyslexia?. Brain and Language, 9, pp. 55-63.
6. Buchholz, J. and Davies, A. Aimola (2006) Do visual attentional factors contribute to phonological ability? Studies in adult dyslexia. Neurocase, 12, pp. 111-121.
7. Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J. and Perea, M. (2005) Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition. Psychological Science, 16, pp. 585-589.
8. Castles, A. and Coltheart, M. (2004) Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?. Cognition, 91, pp. 77-111.
9. Cornelissen, P. L., Richardson, A. J., Mason, A. J. and Stein, J. F. (1995) Contrast sensitivity and coherent motion detection measured at photopic luminance levels in dyslexics and controls. Vision Research, 35, pp. 1483-1494.
10. Cornelissen, P. L., Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P. and Salmelin, R. (2003) Cortical effects of shifting letter-position in letter-strings of varying length. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, pp. 731-748.
11. Davis, C. (1999) The Self-Organizing Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition
12. Davis, C. J. and Bowers, S. J. (2006) Contrasting five different theories of letter-position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, pp. 535-557.
13. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M. and Vinckier, F. (2005) The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, pp. 335-341.
14. Demiralp, T., Bayraktaroglu, Z., Lenz, D., Junge, S., Busch, N. A., Maess, B., Ergen, M. and Herrmann, C. S. (2007) Gamma amplitudes are coupled to theta phase in human EEG during visual perception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64, pp. 24-30.
15. Eviatar, Z. (1999) Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords. Neuropsychology, 13, pp. 498-515.
16. Facoetti, A. and Molteni, M. (2001) The gradient of visual attention in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 39, pp. 352-357.
17. Frankish, C. and Turner, E. (2007) SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, pp. 189-211.
18. Frederiksen, J. and Kroll, J. (1976) Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, pp. 361-379.
19. Goswami, U. and Ziegler, J. C. (2006) A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, pp. 142-143.
20. Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E. and van Heuven, W. (2006) Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, pp. 865-884.
21. Grainger, J. and van Heuven, W. (2003) Modeling letter position encoding in printed word perception. The mental lexicon, pp. 1-24. Nova Science Publishers, New York
22. Grainger, J. and Whitney, C. (2004) Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a whole?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, pp. 58-59.
23. Hammond, E. J. and Green, D. W. (1982) Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, pp. 67-82.
24. Hauk, O. and Pulvermuller, F. (2004) Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, pp. 1090-1103.
25. Hellige, J. B., Cowen, E. L. and Eng, T. L. (1995) Recognition of CVC syllables from LVF, RVF, and central locations: Hemispheric differences and interhemispheric interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, pp. 258-266.
26. Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Wimmer, H., Gruber, W., Rohm, D., Schwaiger, J. and Hutzler, F. (2001) Theta band power changes in normal and dyslexic children. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, pp. 1174-1185.
27. Krause, C. M., Caronholm, P., Leinonen, A., Laine, M., Sakkinen, A. L. and Soderholm, C. (2006) Modality matters: The effects of stimulus modality on the 4- to 30-Hz brain electric oscillation during a lexical decision task. Brain research, 1110, pp. 182-192.
28. Lavidor, M. and Ellis, A. (2002) Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 80, pp. 45-62.
29. Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S. and Chung, S. T. (2001) Psychophysics of reading. XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 41, pp. 725-743.
30. Lisman, J. E. and Idiart, M. A. P. (1995) Storage of 7±2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles. Science, 267, pp. 1512-1515.
31. Livingstone, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W. and Galaburda, A. M. (1991) Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, pp. 7943-7947.
32. Mason, M. (1982) Recognition time for letters and non-letters: Effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, pp. 724-738.
33. New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C. and Brysbaert, M. (2006) Re-examining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, pp. 45-52.
34. Nice, D. S. and Harcum, E. R. (1976) Evidence from mutual masking for serial processing of tachistoscopic letter patterns. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, pp. 991-1003.
35. Penolazzi, B., Hauk, O. and Pulvermuller, F. (2007) Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 74, pp. 374-388.
36. Peressotti, F. and Grainger, J. (1995) Letter position coding in random consonant arrays. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, pp. 875-890.
37. Richardson, J. (1976) The effects of stimulus attributes on latency of word recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 67, pp. 315-325.
38. Roberts, M. A., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M. and Besner, D. (2003) When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, pp. 405-414.
39. Rolls, E. T., Tovee, M. J. and Panzeri, S. (1999) The neurophysiology of backward visual masking: Information analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, pp. 300-311.
40. Schoonbaert, S. and Grainger, J. (2004) Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, pp. 333-367.
41. Sperling, A. J., Zhong-lin, L., Manis, F. R. and Seidenberg, M. S. (2003) Selective magnocellular deficits in dyslexia: A "phantom contour" study. Neuropsychologia, 41, pp. 1422-1429.
42. Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P., Hansen, P. C., Cornelissen, P. L. and Salmelin, R. (1999) Dynamics of letter-string perception in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Brain, 122, pp. 2119-2131.
43. Whitney, C. (2001) How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, pp. 221-243.
44. Whitney, C. (2001) Position-specific effects within the SERIOL framework of letter-position coding. Connection Science, 13, pp. 235-255.
45. Whitney, C. (2004) Investigations into the neural basis of structured representations
46. Whitney, C. (2004) Hemisphere-specific effects in word recognition do not require hemisphere-specific modes of access. Brain and Language, 88, pp. 279-293.
47. Whitney, C. A comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding. Brain and Langurage
48. Whitney, C. (2007) Supporting the serial in the SERIOL model
49. Whitney, C. and Berndt, R. S. (1999) A new model of letter string encoding: Simulating right neglect dyslexia. Progress in Brain Research, 121, pp. 143-163.
50. Whitney, C. and Cornelissen, P. (2005) Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, pp. 274-301.
51. Whitney, C. and Lavidor, M. (2004) Why word length only matters in the left visual field. Neuropsychologia, 42, pp. 1680-1688.
52. Whitney, C. and Lavidor, M. (2005) Facilitative orthographic neighborhood effects: The SERIOL model account. Cognitive Psychology, 51, pp. 179-213.
53. Young, A. W. and Ellis, A. W. (1985) Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields. Brain and Language, 24, pp. 326-358.
54. Ziegler, J. C. and Perry, C. (1998) No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68, p. B53.