The search for an input-coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 375-380

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Mallouh, Reemabu ^b   Carreiras, Manuel ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^c BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; LETTER; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 77957372854     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.375     Document Type: Letter

References (23)

1. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2005). Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 207-260.
2. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2010). Aralex: A lexical database for Modern Standard Arabic. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 481-487.
3. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1327-1339.
4. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales.
5. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposedletter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for ortho-morphological decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703.
6. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: Delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1930-1947.
7. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
8. Frost, R. (2009). Reading in Hebrew versus reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference? In K. Pugh & P. McCardle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 235-254). New York: Psychology Press.
9. Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1293-1326.
10. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
11. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2004). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: "Some words to talk about words" (pp. 1-24). Hauppage, NY: Nova.
12. Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of Arabic orthography slow its cognitive processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 322-326.
13. Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory & Language, 60, 530-542.
14. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 418-422.
15. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841.
16. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
17. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2007). La posición de las letras externas en el reconocimiento visual de palabras. Psicothema, 19, 559-564.
18. Perea, M., & Pérez, E. (2009). Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24, 67-88.
19. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 785-794.
20. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
21. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913-918.
22. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2009). Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory & Language, 61, 285-302.
23. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.