Noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL) - A clinical concept based on the literature review. Part 2: Restoration

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 183-192

  Pecie, Raluca ^a   Krejci, Ivo ^a   García Godoy, Franklin ^b   Bortolotto, Tissiana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; RESIN;

CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH WEAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80051756407     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (149)

1. Tyas MJ. The Class V lesion - aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J 1995;40:167-170.
2. Vandewalle KS, Vigil G. Guidelines for the restoration of Class V lesions. Gen Dent 1997;45:254-260.
3. Blunck U. Improving cervical restorations: A review of materials and techniques. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:33-44. (Pubitemid 33771944)
4. Matis BA, Cochran M, Carlson T. Longevity of glass-ionomer restorative materials: Results of a 10-year evaluation. Quintessence Int 1996;27:373-382. (Pubitemid 126699275)
5. van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000;16:285-291.
6. Terry DA, McGuire MK, McLaren E, Fulton R, Swift EJ Jr. Perioesthetic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of carious and noncarious cervical lesions: Part II. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:284-296. (Pubitemid 37363244)
7. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Five-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2007;20:361-364.
8. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical trial of G-Bond all-in-one adhesive and Gradia Direct resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions-results at 1 year. J Dent 2007;35:623-625.
9. Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Attar N. Clinical evaluation of flowablc resins in noncarious cervical lesions: Two-year results. Oper Dent 2007;32:313-321.
10. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Toothcolored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: A 24-month follow-up study. Oper Dent 2000;25:251-258.
11. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials. 3-year results. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5:31-39.
12. Koubi S, Raskin A, Bukiet F, Pignoly C, Toca E, Tassery H. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7:42-53.
13. Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:451-457. (Pubitemid 38591862)
14. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:593-599.
15. Ozgünaltay G, Onen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1037-1041. (Pubitemid 41697906)
16. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:749-754. (Pubitemid 46628710)
17. Pollington S, van Noort R. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up. Am J Dent 2008;21:49-52.
18. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006;34:97-105. (Pubitemid 43139006)
19. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J AdhesDent 2007;9:7-10.
20. van Dijken JW, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Lindberg A. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater 2001;23:1101-1107.
21. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in noncarious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2008;24:915-922.
22. Ritter AV, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. An eight-year clinical evaluation of filled and unfilled one-bottle dental adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:28-37.
23. Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:477-481. (Pubitemid 37229775)
24. Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Am J Dent 2004;17:147-150.
25. Onal B, Pamir T. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1547-1455.
26. Belluz M, Pedrocca M, Gagliani M. Restorative treatment of cervical lesions with resin composites: 4-year results. Am J Dent 2005;18:307-310. (Pubitemid 43171013)
27. Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Jorge MF, Navarro MF. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2006;31:403-408. (Pubitemid 44276627)
28. Ichim I, Li Q, Loughran J, Swain MV, Kieser J. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Part I. Modelling of restorative fracture. Dent Mater 2007;23:1553-1561. (Pubitemid 350018868)
29. Ichim I, Schmidlin PR, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Mechanical evaluation of cervical glass-ionomer restorations: 3D finite element study. J Dent 2007;35:28-35. (Pubitemid 44881174)
30. Osbome-Smith KL, Burke FJ, Farlane TM, Wilson NH. Effect of restored and unrestored non-carious cervical lesions on the fracture resistance of previously restored maxillary premolar teeth. J Dent 1998;26:427-433. (Pubitemid 128406635)
31. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A. Retention of restorations placed in noncarious cervical lesions after centric and eccentric occlusal loading in a chewing simulator - A pilot study. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:169-174. (Pubitemid 44014525)
32. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ, Mercante DE, Davidson JM. Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as Class V filling materials. Oper Dent 2005;30:275-281. (Pubitemid 40745386)
33. Wood I, Jawad Z, Paisley C, Brunton P. Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: a literature review. J Dent 2008;36:759-766.
34. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2007;32:11-15.
35. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-881. (Pubitemid 41108347)
36. Peumans M, Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci/2005;113:512-518. (Pubitemid 41784338)
37. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli PV, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2004;29:376-385. (Pubitemid 39090785)
38. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 2005;21:375-383. (Pubitemid 40583946)
39. Abdalla AI, El Sayed HY. Clinical evaluation of a self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2008;21:327-330.
40. PerdigiSo J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Amore R, Lewgoy HR, Cordeiro HJ, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent 2005;18:135-140. (Pubitemid 40934183)
41. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: Results at one year. Aust Dent J 2008;53:235-238.
42. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Two-year clinical evaluation of onestep self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2009;37:149-155.
43. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Fieuws S, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Ermis RB, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year. J Dent 2008;36:847-855.
44. Zhou Z, Yu S, Jiang Y, Lin Y, Xiong Y, Ni L. A randomized, controlled clinical trial of one-step self-etching adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2009;22:235-240.
45. Loguercio AD, Bittencourt DD, Baratieri LN, Reis A. A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:507-514.
46. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent 2008;33:370-378.
47. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: Results at five years. Oper Dent 2002;27:438-441. (Pubitemid 41558772)
48. van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent 2004;17:27-32. (Pubitemid 41310024)
49. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive. Am J Dent 2003;16:363-368. (Pubitemid 41310031)
50. van Dijken JW. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up. J Dent 2005;33:541-547. (Pubitemid 40960998)
51. Bortolotto T, Ferrari M, Onisor I, Tay F, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of contemporary bonding agents in enamel and dentin under the simulation of dentinal fluid. Dent SAfr 2005;7:46-58.
52. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-664.
53. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990;69:1240-1243.
54. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in Class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 1988;67:841-845.
55. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": Literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 1999;30:249-257.
56. Borcic J, Anic I, Smojver I, Catic A, Miletic I, Ribaric SP. 3D finite element model and cervical lesion formation in normal occlusion and in malocclusion. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:504-510. (Pubitemid 40979199)
57. Ichim IP, Schmidlin PR, Li Q, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Restoration of noncarious cervical lesions Part II. Restorative material selection to minimise fracture. Dent Mater 2007;23:1562-1569. (Pubitemid 350018869)
58. Lee HE, Lin CL, Wang CH, Cheng CH, Chang CH. Stresses at the cervical lesion of maxillary premolar - A finite element investigation. J Dent 2002;30:283-290. (Pubitemid 40433414)
59. Rees JS. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: A finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1028-1032. (Pubitemid 128737098)
60. Rees JS. A review of the biomechanics of abfraction. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000;8:139-144.
61. Rees JS, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesions: Myth or reality? J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:263-271. (Pubitemid 37363241)
62. Rees JS, Hammadeh M, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesion formation in maxillary incisors, canines and premolars: A finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:149-154. (Pubitemid 37467781)
63. Rees JS. The biomechanics of abfraction. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:69-80.
64. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993;72:1434-1442.
65. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, Ritter AV. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: Three-year results. Oper Dent 2003;28:482-487. (Pubitemid 37229776)
66. Loguercio AD, Zago C, Leal K, Ribeiro NR, Reis A. One-year clinical evaluation of a flowable resin liner associated with a microhybrid resin in noncarious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:18-20. (Pubitemid 40425131)
67. Turner EW, Shook LW, Ross JA, de Rijk W, Eason BC. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite in non-carious Class V lesions: Two-year results. J Tenn Dent Assoc 2008;88:20-24.
68. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical compareson of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions. Oper Dent 2000;25:46-50.
69. Cara RR, Fleming GJ, Palin WM, Walmsley AD, Burke FJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based composites with and without an intermediary flowable layer. J Dent 2007;35:482-489.
70. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15:128-137. (Pubitemid 129586761)
71. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Dent Mater 1998;14:294-306. (Pubitemid 128418327)
72. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Am J Dent 1999;12:119-122.
73. Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:251-257. (Pubitemid 38488861)
74. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1999;30:607-614.
75. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M. Resin-modified glass-ionomers in dentistry. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 1996;103:448451. (In Dutch).
76. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Am J Dent 2001;14:153-156. (Pubitemid 33673789)
77. Ermis RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int 2002;33:542-548.
78. Sunico MC, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations. Oper Dent 2005;30:282-289. (Pubitemid 40745387)
79. Hennig AC, Helbig EB, Haufe E, Richter G, Klimm HW. Restoration of Class V cavities with the ormocer-based filling system Admira. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2004;114:104-114. (In German)
80. Rosin M, Schwahn C, Kordass B, Konschake C, Greese U, Teichmann D, Hartmann A, Meyer G. A multipractice clinical evaluation of an ORMOCER restorative-2-year results. Quintessence Int 2007;38:e306-e315.
81. Santamaria MP, Suaid FF, Casati MZ, Nociti FH, Sallum AW, Sallum EA. Coronally positioned flap plus resin-modified glass ionomer resto-ration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with nonorious cervical lesions: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontal 2008;79:621-628.
82. Terry DA, McGuire MK, McLaren E, Fulton R, Swift EJ Jr. Perioesthetic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of carious and noncarious cervical lesions: Part I. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:217-232. (Pubitemid 37088276)
83. Zucchelli G, Testori T, De Sanctis M. Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: A new method to predetermine the line of root coverage. J Periodontal 2006;77:714-721. (Pubitemid 44725059)
84. Blunck U. Improving cervical restorations: A review of materials and techniques. JAdhes Dent 2001;3:33-44. (Pubitemid 33771944)
85. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress-induced cervical lesions: Review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:487-494. (Pubitemid 126655122)
86. Neo J, Chew CL. Direct tooth-colored materials for noncarious lesions: A 3-year clinical report. Quintessence Int 1996;27:183-188. (Pubitemid 126699253)
87. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: A two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:41-47.
88. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth - A finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:45M59.
89. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Patra AK, Cohen RE. An assessment of stress analyses in the theory of abfraction. Biomed Mater Eng 2004;14:311-321. (Pubitemid 40164087)
90. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: A clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:725-733.
91. Takehara J, Takano T, Akhter R, Morita M. Correlations of noncarious cervical lesions and occlusal factors determined by using pressure-detecting sheet. J Dent 2008;36:774-779.
92. Yuan Y, Shimada Y, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Hybridization quality in cervical cementum and superficial dentin using current adhesives. Dent Mater 2008;24:584-593. (Pubitemid 351389486)
93. Aguiar FH, Santos AJ, Groppo FC, Lovadino JR. Quantitative evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. Oper Dent 2002;27:475-479. (Pubitemid 41558778)
94. Aguiar FH, Ajudarte KF, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing modes and filling techniques on microleakage of posterior resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:557-562. (Pubitemid 41558756)
95. Sensi LG, Marson FC, Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;6:17-25. (Pubitemid 41810917)
96. Costa Pfeifer CS, Braga RR, Cardoso PE. Influence of cavity dimensions, insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:197-202. (Pubitemid 43287310)
97. Hassan KA, Khier SE. Split-increment technique: An alternative approach for large cervical composite resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:121-128.
98. Meira JB, Braga RR, de Carvalho AC, Rodrigues FP, Xavier TA, Ballester RY. Influence of local factors on composite shrinkage stress development - A finite element analysis. JAdhes Dent 2007;9:499-503.
99. Abdalla AI, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical performance of a self-etch adhesive in Class V restorations made with and without acid etching. J Dent 2007;35:558-563.
100. Ausiello, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations - A 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2002;18:295-303. (Pubitemid 40072261)
101. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Two-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:65-68. (Pubitemid 40521776)
102. Dalton Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:173-178. (Pubitemid 40868478)
103. Karan K, Yao X, Xu C, Wang Y. Chemical profile of the dentin substrate in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2009;25:1205-1212.
104. Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Tsubota K, Uekusa S. One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater J 2007;26:14-20.
105. Sugizaki J, Morigami M, Uno S, Yamada T. Clinical evaluation and interfacial morphology observation of Xeno III self-etching resin bonding and restorative system. Dent Mater 2007;26:602-607.
106. Tflrkun LS. The clinical performance of one-and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:656-664.
107. van Dijken JW, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Ssrensson E. Clinical bonding of a single-step self-etching adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent Supp\ 2007;2:241-243.
108. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2004;17:451-456.
109. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:311-322. (Pubitemid 40521652)
110. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in noncarious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2002;15:309-311.
111. Brackett WW, Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estudillo H. Eighteenmonth clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations. Oper Dent 2005;30:424-429. (Pubitemid 41044358)
112. Loguercio AD, Reis A. Application of a dental adhesive using the self-etch and etch-and-rinse approaches: An 18-month clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:53-61.
113. Awliya WY, El-Sahn AM. Leakage pathway of Class V cavities restored with different flowable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2008;33:31-36.
114. Calheiros FC, Sadek FT, Braga RR, Cardoso PE. Polymerization contraction stress of low-shrinkage composites and its correlation with microleakage in class V restorations. J Dent 2004;32:407-412. (Pubitemid 38749120)
115. Campanella LC, Meiers JC. Microleakage of composites and compomers in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1999;12:185-189.
116. Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Scnawongse P. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength. Oper Dent 2007;32:466-475.
117. Sensi LG, Marson FC, Monteiro S Jr, Baratieri LN, Caldeira de Andrada MA. Flowable composites as "filled adhesives:" A microleakage study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004;5:32-41. (Pubitemid 40132210)
118. Yazici AR, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangac B. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities. Oper Dent 2003;28:773-778. (Pubitemid 37456961)
119. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangac B. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities. Oper Dent 2003;28:42-46. (Pubitemid 37229828)
120. Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgflnaltay G. Microleakage of different resin composite types. Quintessence Int 2004;35:790-794. (Pubitemid 39329775)
121. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Prawer S, Tyas MJ. Raman spectroscopic study of noncarious cervical lesions. Odontology 2005;93:35-40. (Pubitemid 41403555)
122. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: A review. J Dent 2004;32:173-196. (Pubitemid 38328461)
123. Eliguzeloglu E, Omurlu H, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S. Effect of surface treatments and different adhesives on the hybrid layer thickness of noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2008;33:338-345.
124. Kusunoki M, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S. The efficacy of dentine adhesive to sclerotic dentine. J Dent 2002;30:91-97. (Pubitemid 40433448)
125. Tani C, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S. Efficacy of dentin bonding to cervical defects. Dent Mater J 2001;20:359-368. (Pubitemid 33675603)
126. Zhou LJ, Tan JG, Hu BH, Feng HL. Ultrastructural study of sclerotic dentin in non-carious cervical lesions disposed by a total-etching dentin adhesive. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2004;36:319-321.
127. Tan JG, Zhou LJ, Feng M, Feng HL. Ultrastructural study of a self-etching adhesive to sclerotic dentin in non-carious cervical lesions. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2005;40(3):230-232.
128. Kwong SM, Cheung GS, Kei LH, Itthagarun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a selfetching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 2002;18:359-369. (Pubitemid 40072252)
129. Bortolotto T, Doudou W, Stavridakis M, Ferrari M, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation after aging of a self-etching adhesive containing an antibacterial monomer. JAdhes Dent 2007;9:311-317.
130. Bagheri M, Ghavamnasiri M. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:122-129.
131. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents. Am J Dent 2004;17:251-261.
132. Kihn PW, Spanganberg PA, von Fraunhofer JA. The role of cavity preparation and conditioning in the leakage of restorations. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:287-291. (Pubitemid 40126102)
133. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Pereira PN, Tagami J. Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. Oper Dent 2001;26:375-382.
134. Pangsrisomboon B, Hamirattisai C, Nilsri K, Burrow MF. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to differently prepared dentin. Am J Dent 2007;20:259-262.
135. Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, Armstrong SR. Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent 2007;35:467-475.
136. Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Spreafico D, Gagliani M, Re D, Tanaka T, Sidhu SK, Sano H. Effect of different bur grinding on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 2006;31:317-323. (Pubitemid 43954680)
137. Ermis RB, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three different diamond burs. Dent Mater 2008;24:978-985.
138. Koase K, Inoue S, Noda M, Tanaka T, Kawamoto C, Takahashi A, Nakaoki Y, Sano H. Effect of bur-cut dentin on bond strength using two all-in-one and one two-step adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:97-104. (Pubitemid 38918753)
139. Shook LW, Turner EW, Ross J, Scarbecz M. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:779-785. (Pubitemid 37456962)
140. Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Ermis RB, Poitevin A, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Carvalho RC, Van Meerbeek B. Influence of dentin cavity surface finishing on micro-tenisle bond strength of adhesives. Dent Mater 2008;24:492-501. (Pubitemid 351222673)
141. Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Coutinho E, Ermis RB, Van Landuyt K, de Carvalho RC, Van Meerbeek B. Influence of Er. CnYSGG laser treatment on microtensile bond strength of adhesives to enamel. Oper Dent 2008;33:448-455.
142. Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Ermis RB, Poitevin A, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Carvalho RC, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Influence of Er, Cr:YSGG laser treatment on the microtensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. JAdhes Dent 2008;10:25-33.
143. Jordehi AY, Ghasemi A, Zadeh MM, Fekrazad R. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer cements to dentin after conditioning with the Er. CnYSGG laser. PhotomedLaser Surg 2007;25:402406.
144. Ergucu Z, Celik EU, Turkun M. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er, Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation. Gen Dent 2007;55:27-32.
145. Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, De SA, Rocha RA, Ramos TS, Palma-Dibb RG. Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1008-1014. (Pubitemid 37340240)
146. Bader C, Krejci I. Marginal quality in enamel and dentin after preparation and finishing with an EnYAG laser. Am J Dent 2006;19:337-342.
147. Delme KI, Deman PJ, De Moor RJ. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and EnYAG laser preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:676-685. (Pubitemid 41216044)
148. Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA. Cavity preparation devices: Effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001;14:157-162. (Pubitemid 33673790)
149. Onisor I, Bouillaguet S, Krejci I. Influence of different surface treatments on marginal adaptation in enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:297-303.