Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 153-156

  Folwaczny, Matthias ^a   Mehl, Albert ^a   Kunzelmann, Karl Heinz ^a   Hickel, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; CARBOPOL 940; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISCOLORATION; TOOTH DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLOR; COMPOMERS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILICATES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISCOLORATION; TOOTH DISEASES;

EID: 0035376148     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, et al. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994; 22: 195-207.
2. Tyas MJ. The class V lesion - Aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J 1995; 40: 167-170.
3. Sidhu SK. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 553-559.
4. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 59-67.
5. Cortes O, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR. Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 1993;6:299-301.
6. Garcia-Godoy F, Draheim RN, Titus HW, et al. Microleakage of composite restorations with etched and non-etched glass-ionomer bases. Am J Dent 1988; 1: 159-162.
7. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 687-692.
8. Tyas MJ. The effect of dentin conditioning with polyacrylic acid on the clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement - 3 year results. Aust Dent J 1994; 39: 220-227.
9. Voß A, Hickel R. Nachuntersuchung von zervikalen Glasionomerzement-und Kompositfüllungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1988; 43: 944-946.
10. Van Dijken WW. Four-year evaluation of the effect of 10% polyacrylic acid or water rinsing pretreatment on retention of glass polyalkenoate cement. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 64-66.
11. Matis BA, Cochran M, Carlson T. Longevity of glass-ionomer restorative materials: Results of a 10-year evaluation. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 373-382.
12. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 203-209.
13. Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, et al. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 15-18.
14. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, et al. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 119-122.
15. Swift EJ, Pawlus MA, Vargas MA. Shear bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 138-143.
16. Friedl KH, Powers JM, Hiller KA. Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1995; 30: 74-80.
17. Sidhu, S.K. Marginal contraction gap formation of light-cured glass-ionomers. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 115-118.
18. Maneenut C, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical abrasion lesions: One-year results. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 739-743.
19. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: Two-year results. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 255-258.
20. Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO, Browning WD, et al. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 9-13.
21. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials.Dent Mater 1996; 12: 64-69.
22. Triana R, Prado C, Garro J, et al. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 252-254.
23. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 18-20.
24. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 1998; 23: 77-80.
25. Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Polymeric adhesion: Contrasting substrates. Am J Dent 1990; 3: 264-270.
26. Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 241-246.
27. De Gee AJ, Van Duinen RNB, Werner A, et al. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1613-1619.
28. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, et al. Comparative physico-me~chanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 883-894.
29. Jokstad A, Mjör IA, Nilner K, et al. Clinical performance of three anterior restorative materials over 10 years. Quintessence Int 1994;25:101-108.
30. Creo AL, Viavattine JJ. Comparison of in vitro wear of glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 220.