Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: Three-year results

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 482-487

  Narciso Baratieri, Luiz ^a   Canabarro, Simone ^b   Lopes, Guilherme C ^a,c   Ritter, André V ^d,e  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e CB #7450 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH FILLING; VISCOSITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; PARTICLE SIZE; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH EROSION; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0141924494     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American Dental Association - Council on Scientific Affairs American Dental Association program guidelines: Products for Dentin and Enamel Adhesive Materials, June 2001 (available at: www.ada.org).
2. Burrow MF & Tyas MJ (1999) 1-year clinical evaluation of one-step in non-carious cervical lesions American Journal of Dentistry 12(6) 283-285.
3. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH & Liu P (1996) Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems American Journal of Dentistry 9(6) 245-248.
4. Christensen G (1996) Restoration of Class V tooth defects-state of art Clinical Research Associates Newsletter 20 1-2.
5. Cvar JF & Ryge G (1971) Criteria for the Clinical Evaluation of Dental Restorative Materials USPHS publication No 790-244 San Francisco US Government Printing Office.
6. Finger WJ & Fritz U (1996) Laboratory evaluation of one-component enamel/dentin bonding agents American Journal of Dentistry 9(5) 206-210.
7. Fitchie JG, Puckett AD, Reeves GW & Hembree JH (1995) Microleakage of a new dental adhesive comparing microfilled and hybrid resin composites Quintessence International 26(7) 505-510.
8. Fruits TJ, VanBrunt CL, Khajotia SS & Duncanson MG Jr (2002) Effects of cyclical lateral forces on microleakage in cervical resin composite restorations Quintessence International 33(3) 205-212.
9. Heymann HO & Bayne SC (1993) Current concepts in dentin bonding: Focusing on dentinal adhesion factors Journal of the American Dental Association 124(5) 26-36.
10. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB & Brunson WD (1991) Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: A two-year clinical study Journal of the American Dental Association 122(6) 41-47.
11. Ianzano JA & Gwinnett AJ (1993) Clinical evaluation of Class V restorations using a total etch technique: 1-year results American Journal of Dentistry 6(4) 207-210.
12. rd (1996) Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance American Journal of Dentistry 9(6) 273-276.
13. rd (1997) One-step bond strength to enamel and dentin American Journal of Dentistry 10(1) 5-8.
14. Kemp-Scholte CM & Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility Journal of Dental Research 69(6) 1240-1243.
15. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA & Heymann HO (1994) Non-carious cervical lesions Journal of Dentistry 22(4) 195-207.
16. Lopes GC, Costa G, Rampinelli K, Vieira LCC & Baratieri LN (2002) Shear Bond Strengths of acetone-based One-Bottle Adhesive Systems Journal of Dental Research 81 Abstract #173 p B-63.
17. Miller M (1997) Flowable composite Reality 11 169-174.
18. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yücel T & Vanherle G (1996) The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin American Journal of Dentistry 9(4) 167-173.
19. Perdigão J, Swift EJ Jr, Gomes G & Lopes GC (1999) Bond strengths of new simplified dentin-enamel adhesives American Journal of Dentistry 12(6) 286-290.
20. Perdigão J, Swift EJ Jr & Lopes GC (1999) Effects of repeated use on bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives Quintessence International 30(12) 819-823.
21. Schwartz RS, Haveman CW, Conn LJ, Summitt JB & Robbins JW (1998) Clinical evaluation of a one bottle adhesive: 18-month results Journal of Dental Research 77 Abstract #1534 p 297.
22. Snuggs HM, Powell CS, Cox CF & White KC (1992) Six month clinical evaluation of cervical lesions after acid etching and restoration Journal of Dental Research 71 Abstract #1169 p 661.
23. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Wilder AD & Roberson TM (1999) 3-year clinical evaluation of acetone-based VLC dentin bonding system Journal of Dental Research 78 Abstract #2279 p 390.
24. Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr & Waddell SL (1997) Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications Operative Dentistry 22(5) 194-199.
25. Tyas MJ (1994) Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems American Journal of Dentistry 7(2) 77-80.
26. Van Dijken JW (2000) Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions Dental Materials 16(4) 285-291.
27. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1996) Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions Quintessence International 27(11) 775-784.
28. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1994) Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems Journal of Dental Research 73(11) 1690-1702.