One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 451-456

  Aw, Tar C ^a   Lepe, Xavier ^a   Johnson, Glen H ^a   Mancl, Lloyd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ONE COAT BOND; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILUX PLUS; SINGLE BOND; SOLVENT; SYNERGY COMPOSITE RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ETHANOL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; SOLVENTS; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 14544281084     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Hand JS, Hunt RJ, Reinhardt JW. The prevalence and treatment implications of cervical abrasion in the elderly. Gerodontics 1986; 2:167-170. (Pubitemid 17204698)
2. Bergstrom J, Lavstedt S. An epidemiologic approach to tooth brushing and dental abrasion. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979; 7:57-64. (Pubitemid 9118686)
3. Balanko M, Jordan RE. Gingivally submerged cervical erosion lesion. A clinical problem. J Esthet Dent 1990; 2:104-108.
4. Hong F-1, Nu Z-y, Xie X-m. Clinical Classification and therapeutic design of dental cervical abrasion. Gerodontics 1988; 4:101-103.
5. Poynter ME, Wright PS. Tooth wear and some factors influencing its severity. Rest Dent 1990: 6:8-11.
6. Radentz WH, Barnes GP, Cutright DE A survey of factors possibly associated with cervical abrasion of tooth surfaces. J Periodontol 1976; 47:148-54.
7. Xhonga FA, Valdmanis S. Geographic comparisons of the incidence of dental erosion: A two centre study. J Oral Rehabil 1983; 10:269-277.
8. Schaffner M, Suter P, Hotz P, Lussi A Epidemiology of dental erosion and toothbrush abrasion. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 388.
9. Jarvinen VK, Rytomaa II, Heinonen OP. Risk factors in dental erosion. J Dent Res 1991; 70:942-947.
10. Grippo JO, Simring M. Dental "erosion" revisited. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126:619-630.
11. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Davidson CL. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system. Dent Mater 1997; 13:157-162.
12. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Homer JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent 1996 Nov; 24:435-442. (Pubitemid 126372812)
13. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994; 22:195-207.
14. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress induced cervical lesions: Review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75:487-494. (Pubitemid 126655122)
15. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: A two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122:41-47.
16. Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma N. Biomechanics of cervical tooth structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence Int 2000; 31:267-274.
17. Osbome-Smith KL, Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion. Int Dent J 1999; 49:139-143.
18. Eccles JD, Jenkins WG. Dental erosion and diet J Dent 1974; 2:153-159.
19. Bader JD, Levitch LC, Shugars DA Heymann HO, McClure F. How dentists classified and treated non-carious cervical lesions. JAm Dent Assoc 1993; 124:46-54.
20. Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. Mode of failure in the dentin-adhesive resin-resin composite bonded joint as determined by strength-based (muTBS) and fracture-based (CNSB) mechanical testing. Dent Mater 2001; 17:201-210. (Pubitemid 33651198)
21. Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentin bonding: Focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. JAm Dent Assoc 1993; 124:26-36.
22. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: From first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131(Suppl):20S-25S.
23. Leinfelder KF. Current developments in dentin bonding systems: Major progress found in today's products. JAm Dent Assoc 1993; 124:40-42.
24. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1690-1702.
25. thed. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc., 2002.
26. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 2001; 14:132-136. (Pubitemid 33673784)
27. Cardoso PE, Placido E Francci CE, Perdigao J. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1999; 12:291-294.
28. American Society of Anesthesiologists. The ASA physical status classification system Available at: "wvw.asahq.org/Proflnfo/PhysicalStatus. html", Accessed September 30, 2001.
29. Aw TC, Lepe XL, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. Characteristics of non-carious cervical lesions: A clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133:725-733.
30. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent 1991; 4:247-250.
31. nd ed. St Louis: Mosby, Inc., 1993.
32. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70:308-314.
33. Hall LH, Cochran MA Swartz ML Class 5 composite resin restorations: Margin configurations and distance from the CEJ. Oper Dent 1993; 18:246-250.
34. Grieve AR, Saunders WP, Alani AH. The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations - Long-term studies. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20:11-18.
35. Vanherle G, Lambrechts P, Braem M. An evaluation of different adhesive restorations in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:341-347.
36. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criterion for the critical evaluation of dental restorative materials, USPHS publication No. 790-244: Washington DC, US Government anting Office, 1971.
37. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association; January 1994.
38. Staninec M, Kawakami M. Adhesion and microleakage tests of a new dentin bonding system. Dent Mater 1993; 9:204-208.
39. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1240-1243.
40. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Wilder AD Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132:1117-1123. (Pubitemid 33609936)
41. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr. Bayne SC, May KN Jr, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Eighteen month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001; 29:1-6. (Pubitemid 33660534)
42. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. 1-year clinical evaluation of One-step in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 1999; 12:283-285.
43. van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000; 16:285-291.
44. Perdigao J, Ramos JC, Lambrechts P. In vitro interracial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater 1997; 13:218-227.
45. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions. Oper Dent 2000; 25:46-50.
46. Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with a smear-layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:333-341.
47. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of Class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129:593-599.
48. Mandras RS, Thurmond JW, Latta MA, Matranga LF, Kilder JM, Barkmeier WW. Three-year clinical evaluation of the Clearfil Liner Bond system. Oper Dent 1997; 22:266-270. (Pubitemid 127711725)
49. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:775-784. (Pubitemid 126699350)
50. Tyas MJ. Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results. Aust Dent J 1996;41:324-327. (Pubitemid 126493236)
51. Ianzano JA, Gwinnett AJ. Clinical evaluation of Class V restorations using a total etch technique: 1 -year results. Am J Dent 1993; 6:207-210.
52. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multi-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82:209-213.
53. Yap AU, Ho KS, Wong KM. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25:666-671. (Pubitemid 128705305)
54. Settembrini L, Gultz JP, Scherer W, Kaim J. A single-component bonding system microleakage study. Gen Dent 1997; 45:341-343.
55. Davidson CL, Abdalla Al. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1994; 7:111-114.
56. Abdalla Al, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1993; 6:295-298.
57. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2000; 16:48-56.
58. Ide M, Morel AD, Wilson RF, Ashley FP. The role of a dentine-bonding agent in reducing cervical dentine sensitivity. J Clin Periodontal 1998; 25:286-290. (Pubitemid 128706510)
59. Ianzano JA, Gwinnett AJ, Westbay G. Polymeric sealing of dentinal tubules to control sensitivity: prelimimiy observations. Periodontal Clin Investig 1993; 15:13-16.
60. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121:694-696.
61. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological characterization of the interface between resin and sclerotic dentine. J Dent 1994; 22:141-146.
62. Ketterl W. Age-induced changes in the teeth and their attachment apparatus. Int Dent J 1983; 33:262-271.