One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass lonomer in non-carious cervical lesions

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 042-053

  Koubi, Stephen ^a   Raskin, Anne ^a   Bukiet, Frédéric ^a   Pignoly, Christian ^a   Toca, Edwige ^a   Tassery, Hervé ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Non carious cervical lesion; Polymerization methods; Visual and digital analysis

Indexed keywords

GLASS; RESIN; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; FILTEK FLOW; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; INTEN S COMPOSITE; INTEN-S COMPOSITE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DENTIST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHOTOGRAPHY; POLYMERIZATION; RANK SUM TEST; SCLEROSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; HARDNESS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHASE TRANSITION; POROSITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; PHASE TRANSITION; POROSITY; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL; TOOTH ATTRITION; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH EROSION;

EID: 33750950816     PISSN: 15263711     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, Ferreri S. The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 117-23.
2. Lussi A. Dental erosion clinical diagnosis and case history. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 191-196.
3. Lussi A, Schaffner M. Progression of and risk factors for dental erosion and wedge-shaped defects over a 6-years period. Caries Res 2000; 34: 182-187.
4. Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion. Int Dent J. 1999; 49: 139-43.
5. Rees JS, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesions: myth or reality? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003; 15: 259-60.
6. Arnadottir IB, Saemundsson SR, Holbrook WP. Dental erosion in Icelandic teenagers in relation to dietary and lifestyle factors. Acta Odontol Scand 2003; 61: 25-8.
7. Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Braem M, Vanherle G. Restorative therapy for erosive lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104:229-240.
8. Mjör IA. Clinical management and tissue changes associated with wear and trauma. Pulp-Dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc. 2002. Chap 5; 77-94.
9. Abdalla AL, Alhadainy HA. Clinical evaluation of hydride ionomer restoratives in class V abrasion lesions: Two-year results. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 255-258.
10. Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 477-81.
11. Ermis RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int. 2002; 33: 542-8.
12. Ozgunaltay G, Onen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29:1037-41.
13. Young WG, Khan F. Sites of dental erosion are saliva-dependent. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 35-43.
14. Pintado MR, Delong R, Ko CC, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH. Correlation of noncarious cervical lesion size and occlusal wear in a single adult over a 14-year time span. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 436-43.
15. Whitehead SA, Wilson NH, Watts DC. Development of noncarious cervical notch lesions in vitro. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 57
16. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of non-carious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133: 725-733.
17. Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998; 26: 695-700.
18. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical Evaluation of posterior composite restoration: The 10-year report. J Adhesive Dent 2001; 13: 185-194.
19. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions: J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121: 694-6.
20. Swift Jr EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO, Wilder Jr AD, Bayne SC, May Jr KN, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001; 29: 1-6.
21. Imfeld T. dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. Eur J oral Sci1996; 104: 151-155.
22. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of non-carious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133: 725-733.
23. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF. Five-year double-blind randomised clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glassionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 323-332.
24. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-coloured materials-3 year results. Clin Oral Invest 2001; 5: 31-39.
25. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 251-258.
26. Grippo JO. Noncarious cervical lesions: the decision to ignore or restore. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4: 55-64.
27. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive. Am J Dent. 2003; 16: 363-8.
28. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem MJ, Lambrechts P, Van-Herle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterisation of new hydride restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 883-894.
29. Kaplan I, Mincer HH, Harris EF, Clyod JS. Microleakage of composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations in retentive and non-retentive cervical cavity preparations. J Prothet Dent 1992, 68: 616-623.
30. Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, Sidhu S. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent 1996; 9:15-8.
31. Christensen GJ. Magnification in dentistry: useful tool or another gimmick?. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1647-50.
32. Lussi A, Jeaggi T, Schaffner M. Preventive and minimally invasive treatment of erosions. Oral Health Prev Dent 2004; 2: supplement 1: 321-325.