Restorative treatment of cervical lesions with resin composites: 4-Year results

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 307-310

  Belluz, Mauro ^a   Pedrocca, Monica ^a   Gagliani, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; POLYURETHAN; RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL; TIME; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADULT; AGED; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYURETHANES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 31644449383     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Grippo JO. Abfractions: A new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:14-19.
2. Blunk U. Improving cervical restorations. Review of materials and techniques. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:33-44.
3. Owens BM, Gallien GS. Non-carious dental "abfraction" lesions in an aging population. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995;16:552-554.
4. Lee WC, Eakle W. Stress induced cervical lesions: Review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:487-494.
5. Khan F, Young WG, Shahabi S. Dental cervical lesions associated with occlusal erosion and attrition. Aust Dent J 1999;44:176-186.
6. Palamara D, Palamara JE, Tyas MJ, Messer HH. Strain patterns in cervical enamel of teeth subjected to occlusal loading. Dent Mater 2000;16:412-419.
7. Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma M. Biomechanics of cervical structure lesions and their restoration Quintessence Int 2000;31:267-274.
8. Kemp Scholte D, Davidson C. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-664.
9. Kemp Scholte D, Davidson C. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990;69:1240-1243.
10. Spears IR. A three- dimensional finite element model of prismatic enamel: A re-appraisal of then data on the young's modulus of enamel. J Dent Res 1997;76:1690-1697.
11. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:11-19.
12. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy AH. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restorative in Class V abrasion lesions: Two-year results. Quintessence Int 1997;28:255-258.
13. Barnes DM, McDonald NJ, Thompson VP, Blank LW, Shires PJ. Microleakage in facial and lingual class V composite restorations: A comparison. Oper Dent 1994;19:133-137. Vanherle
14. Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. A three-year evaluation of restoration placed with a smear-layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions J Adhes Dent 1999;1:333-341.
15. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass ionomer adhesive system-result at three years Oper Dent 2001;26:17-20.
16. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5 year results. Am J Dent 2001;14:153-156.
17. Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L, Montanari L. Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: A three year retrospective study. Clin Oral Invest 1998;2:168-173
18. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Wilder AD Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1117-1123.
19. Van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000;16:285-291.
20. Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Bræm M, Vannerie G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:308-314.
21. Winkler MM, Katona TR, Paydar NH. Finite element stress analysis of three filling technique for class V light-cured composite restorations. J Dent Res 1996;75:1477-1483.
22. Yap AUJ, Lim CC, Neo JCL. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems. Quintessence Int 1995;26:817-820.
23. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The effect of cuspal flexure on a buccal Class V restoration: A finite element study. J Dent Res 1998;26:361-367.
24. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The effect of interfacial failure around a class V composite restoration analyzed by the finite element method J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:111-116.