Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: A new method to predetermine the line of root coverage

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 714-721

  Zucchelli, Giovanni ^a   Testori, T ^b   De Sanctis, M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cemento enamel junction; Gingival recession; Interdental papilla; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENAMEL; ESTHETICS; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; DENTAL SURGERY; GINGIVA; GINGIVITIS; GINGIVOPLASTY; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; PATHOLOGY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

DENTAL OCCLUSION, TRAUMATIC; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GINGIVITIS; GINGIVOPLASTY; HUMANS; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTH CERVIX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTICAL DIMENSION; VESTIBULOPLASTY;

EID: 33646925891     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.050038     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Wennstrom JL. Mucogingival surgery. In: Lang NP, Karring T, eds. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing; 1994:193-209.
2. Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(2): 8-13.
3. Wennstrom JL. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol 1996;1:671-701.
4. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Needleman I, Sanz M. Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 (Suppl. 3):178-194.
5. Wennstrom JL, Zucchelli G. Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2-year prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23:770-777.
6. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63:995-996.
7. Cardaropoli D, Re S, Corrente G. The papilla presence index (PPI): A new system to assess interproximal papillary levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:488-492.
8. Pini Prato GP, Rotundo R, Cortellini P, Tinti C, Azzi R. Interdental papilla management: A review and classification of the therapeutic approaches. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:246-255.
9. Zucchelli G, Clauser C, De Sanctis M, Calandriello M. Mucogingival versus GTR procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects. J Periodontol 1998; 69:138-145.
10. Zucchelli G, Amore C, Montebugnoli L, De Sanctis M. Bilaminar techniques for the treatment of recession type defects. A comparative clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:862-887.
11. Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession type defects in patients with aesthetic demands. J Periodontol 2000;71:1506-1514.
12. Zucchelli G, Cesari C, Amore C, Montebugnoli L, De Sanctis M. Laterally-moved, coronally advanced flap: A modified surgical approach for isolated recession type of defects. J Periodontol 2004;75:1734-1741.