A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 311-322

  Aw, Tar C ^a   Lepe, Xavier ^a   Johnson, Glen H ^a   Mancl, Lloyd A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesive retention; Bonding agents; Class V restorations; Noncarious cervical lesions; Solvents

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN CEMENT; SOLVENT; ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ONE COAT BOND; RESIN; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SINGLE BOND;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ADULT; AGED; CHEMISTRY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISCOLORATION;

ADHESIVES; ADULT; AGED; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISCOLORATION;

EID: 17144408008     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0171     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Hand JS, Hunt RJ, Reinhardt JW. The prevalence and treatment implications of cervical abrasion in the elderly. Gerodontics 1986;2(5):167-70.
2. Bergstrom J, Lavstedt S. An epidemiologic approach to toothbrushing and dental abrasion. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979;7(1):57-64.
3. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Tobias TS, Cohen RE. Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: a re-evaluation. JADA 2003;134:845-50.
4. Hong FL, Nu ZY, Xie XM. Clinical classification and therapeutic design of dental cervical abrasion. Gerodontics 1988;4(2):101-3.
5. Poynter ME, Wright PS. Tooth wear and some factors influencing its severity. Restorative Dent 1990;6(4):8-11.
6. Radentz WH, Barnes GP, Cutright DE. A survey of factors possibly associated with cervical abrasion of tooth surfaces. J Periodontol 1976;47(3):148-54.
7. Xhonga FA, Valdmanis S. Geographic comparisons of the incidence of dental erosion: a two centre study. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10:269-77.
8. Schaffner M, Suter P, Hotz P, Lussi A. Epidemiology of dental erosion and toothbrush abrasion (abstract 2205). J Dent Res 1988;67:388.
9. Jarvinen VK, Rytomaa II, Heinonen OP. Risk factors in dental erosion. J Dent Res 1991;70:942-7.
10. Grippo JO, Simring M. Dental 'erosion' revisited. JADA 1995;126:619-30.
11. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Davidson CL. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system. Dent Mater 1997;13(3):157-62.
12. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Horner JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent 1996;24(6):435-42.
13. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22(4):195-207.
14. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress-induced cervical lesions: review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75(5):487-94.
15. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. JADA 1991;122(5):41-7.
16. Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma M. Biomechanics of cervical tooth structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence Int 2000;31(4):267-74.
17. Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJ. Wilson NH. The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion. Int Dent J 1999;49(3):139-43.
18. Eccles JD, Jenkins WG. Dental erosion and diet. J Dent 1974;2(4):153-9.
19. Bader JD, Levitch LC, Shugars DA, Heymann HO, McClure F. How dentists classified and treated non-carious cervical lesions. JADA 1993;124(5):46-54.
20. Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. Mode of failure in the dentin-adhesive resin-resin composite bonded joint as determined by strength-based (muTBS) and fracture-based (CNSB) mechanical testing. Dent Mater 2001;17(3):201-10.
21. Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentin bonding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. JADA 1993;124(5):26-36.
22. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. JADA 2000;131(supplement):20S-25S.
23. Leinfelder KF. Current developments in dentin bonding systems: major progress found in today's products. JADA 1993;124(5):40-2.
24. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73(11):1690-702.
25. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002.
26. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 2001;14(3):132-6.
27. Cardoso PE, Placido E, Francci CE, Perdigao J. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1999;12(6):291-4.
28. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system. Available at: "www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm". Accessed Jan. 24, 2003.
29. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation. JADA 2002;133:725-33.
30. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent 1991;4(5):247-50.
31. Jordan RE. Esthetic composite bonding: Techniques and materials. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993.
32. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70(4):308-14.
33. Hall LH, Cochran MA, Swartz ML. Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and distance from the CEJ. Oper Dent 1993;18(6):246-50.
34. Grieve AR, Saunders WP, Alani AH. The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations: long-term studies. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20(1):11-8.
35. Vanherle G, Lambrechts P, Braem M. An evaluation of different adhesive restorations in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65(3):341-7.
36. Cvar JF, Ryge G. criterion for the critical evaluation of dental restorative materials. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1971. U.S. Public Health Service publication 790-244.
37. American Dental Association, Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1994.
38. Hardin JW, Hilbe J. Generalized estimating equations. Boca Raton, Fla.: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2003.
39. Staninec M, Kawakami M. Adhesion and microleakage tests of a new dentin bonding system. Dent Mater 1993;9(3):204-8.
40. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990;69(6):1240-3.
41. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Wilder AD Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. JADA 2001;132:1117-23.
42. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2002;15(5):309-11.
43. van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000;16(4):285-91.
44. Perdigao J, Ramos JC, Lambrechts P. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater 1997;13(4):218-27.
45. Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with a smear-layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:333-41.
46. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. JADA 1998;129:593-9.
47. Mandras RS, Thurmond JW, Latta MA, Matranga LF, Kildee JM, Barkmeier WW. Three-year clinical evaluation of the Clearfil Liner Bond system. Oper Dent 1997;22(6):266-70.
48. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1996;27:775-84.
49. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems: three-year results. Int Dent J 1996;46(1):10-4.
50. Ozgunaltay G, Onen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1037-41.
51. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multi-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82(2):209-13.
52. St Georges AJ, Wilder AD Jr, Perdigao J, Swift EJ Jr. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study. Am J Dent 2002;15(4):244-7.
53. Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations. J Dent 2001;29(2):123-30.
54. Yap AU, Ho KS, Wong KM. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25(9):666-71.
55. Settembrini L, Gultz JP, Scherer W, Kaim J. A single-component bonding system microleakage study. Gen Dent 1997;45(4):341-3.
56. Schmitt DC, Lee J. Microleakage of adhesive resin systems in the primary and permanent dentitions. Pediatr Dent 2002;24(6):587-93.
57. Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1994;7(2):111-4.
58. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1993;6(6):295-8.
59. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2000;16(1):48-56.
60. Ide M, Morel AD, Wilson RF, Ashley FP. The role of a dentine-bonding agent in reducing cervical dentine sensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25(4):286-90.
61. Prati C, Cervellati F, Sanasi V, Montebugnoli L. Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity with resin adhesives: 4-week evaluation. Am J Dent 2001;14(6):378-82.
62. Swift EJ Jr, May KN Jr, Mitchell S. Clinical evaluation of Prime & Bond 2.1 for treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent 2001;14(1):13-6.
63. Ianzano JA, Gwinnett AJ, Westbay G. Polymeric sealing of dentinal tubules to control sensitivity: preliminary observations. Periodontal Clin Investig 1993;15(1):13-6.
64. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions. JADA 1990;121(6):694-6.
65. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. Twelve-month clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2004;17:451-6.