The clinical performance of one- and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 136, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 656-664

  Türkün, L Şebnem ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Antibacterial adhesive system; Non carious cervical lesions; Self etching adhesive

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ETCHING; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH COLOR;

EID: 20144381458     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0239     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26(1):1-20.
2. Imazato S. A new adhesive system incorporating an antibacterial monomer MDPB: its efficacy and benefit. In: Self-etching primer: current status and its evolution. Proceedings of the International Symposium '01; June 26, 2001; Tokyo.
3. Inoue S, van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. In: Proceedings of advanced adhesive dentistry. 3rd International Kuraray Symposium; December 3-4, 1999; Granada, Spain.
4. Haller B. Recent development in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 2000;13:44-50.
5. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives, part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001;17:430-44.
6. Perdigão J, May KN Jr, Wilder AD Jr, Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 2000;25:186-94.
7. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven modern adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:237-45.
8. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, et al. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:414-20.
9. Ratledge DK, Kidd EA, Beighton D. A clinical and microbiological study of approximal carious lesions, part 2: efficacy of caries removal following tunnel and class II cavity preparations. Caries Res 2001;35:8-11.
10. Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dental Mater 2003;19:449-57.
11. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Torii M, Russell RR, McCabe JF. Incorporation of antibacterial monomer MDPB in dentin primer. J Dent Res 1997;76:768-72.
12. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Ebisu S, Tay FR. Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dent Mater 2003;19:313-9.
13. Imazato S, Ebi N, Tarumi H, Russell RRB, Kaneko T, Ebisu S. Bactericidal activity and cytotoxicity of antibacterial monomer MDPB. Biomaterials 1999;20:899-903.
14. Imazato S, Kaneko T, Takahashi Y, Noiri Y, Ebisu S. In vivo antibacterial effects incorporating MDPB. Oper Dent 2004;29:369-75.
15. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, et al. Clinical status often dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:1690-702.
16. Duke ES. Clinical studies of adhesive systems. Oper Dent 1992;5(supplement):103-10.
17. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent 1991;4:247-50.
18. Ermiş, RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Inter 2002;33:542-8.
19. Gladys S. In vitro and in vivo characterization of hybrid restorative materials. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press; 1997.
20. van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000;16:285-91.
21. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials: 3-year results. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5:31-9.
22. Ziemiecki TL, Dennison JB, Charbeneau GT. Clinical evaluation of cervical composite resin restorations placed without retention. Oper Dent 1987;12:27-33.
23. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1996;27:775-84.
24. Özgünaltay G, Önen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious Class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1037-41.
25. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, et al. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001;29:1-6.
26. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Wilder AD Jr, Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. JADA 2001;132:1117-23.
27. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-58.
28. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1994.
29. Türkün LŞ. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent 2003;31:527-34.
30. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-11.
31. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. JADA 1991;122:41-7.
32. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Brunson WD, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Bayne S. Twelve-month clinical study on dentin adhesives in Class V cervical lesions. JADA 1988;116:179-83.
33. Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent 1991;4:241-6.
34. Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Oper Dent 1995;20:7-13.
35. Browning WD, Dennison JB. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21:160-6.
36. Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO, Browning WD, Gregory PN. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent 1999;24:9-13.
37. Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Vanherle G. Factors affecting adhesion to mineralized tissues. Oper Dent 1992;17(supplement 5):111-24.
38. Kanca J 3rd. Posterior resins: microleakage below the cementoenamel junction. Quintessence Int 1987;18:347-9.
39. Tonn EM, Ryge G. Two-year clinical evaluation of light-cured composite resin restorations in primary molars. JADA 1985;111:44-8.
40. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int 1991;22:687-92.
41. Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, Sidhu S. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent 1996;9:15-8.
42. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions. JADA 1990;121:694-6.
43. Boghosian A. Clinical evaluation of a filled adhesive system in class 5 restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:750-7.
44. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light-cured resin composites on bonding of all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:207-25.
45. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems, part I: depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308.
46. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371-82.
47. Imazato S, Imai T, Ebisu S. Antibacterial activity of proprietary self-etching primers. Am J Dent 1998;11:106-8.
48. Imazato S, Ehara A, Torii M, Ebisu S. Antibacterial activity of dentin primer containing MDPB after curing. J Dent 1998;26:267-71.