Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 363-368

  Peumans, Marleen ^a   Van Meerbeek, Bart ^a   Lambrechts, Paul ^a   Vanherle, Guido ^a   Lemaire, ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF IMAGING AND PATHOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUJI GLASS IONOMER LINING CEMENT; FUJI GLASS-IONOMER LINING CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH EROSION;

EID: 1842591325     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven modern adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3: 237-245.
2. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 48-56.
3. Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive Class V restorations. J Dent 2001; 29: 123-130.
4. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical status often dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1690-1702.
5. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 775-784.
6. Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with a smear-layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 333-341.
7. van Dijken JWV. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 285-291.
8. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20.
9. Davidson CL, Mjör IA. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 1999.
10. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding of biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 709-714.
11. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass-ionomer cement Br Dent J 1972; 15: 133-135.
12. Antonucci JM, McKinney JE, Stansbury JW. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. US patent application, 160856, 1988.
13. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K, Nakayama Y. Mechanisms of bonding of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 911 (Abstr 2236).
14. Watson TF. Bonding to tooth structure. In: Glass-ionomers and their modifications: Theory and Practice. Davidson CL, Mjör I (ed). Berlin: Quintessence International 1999: 121-135.
15. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1993;6: 295-298.
16. Yamada T, Kanemura N, Inokoshi S, Tagami J, Kato S. Tensile bond strength and interfacial ultrastructure of a new resin bonding system based on a glass polyalkenoate cement. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 257 (Abstr 1920).
17. Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H. Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. Dent Mater 2001; 17:445-455.
18. Gordan VV, Boyer D, Söderholm KJ. Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 497-503.
19. Yap Au, Ho KS, Wong KM. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 666-671.
20. Tulunoglu O, Uctash M, Alacam A, Omurlu H. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure techniques. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 292-298.
21. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive system. Oper Dent 1998, 23: 290-293.
22. Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Fundamentals of operative dentistry: A contemporary approach. Summit JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS (ed). Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 2001: 178-235.
23. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 294-306.
24. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical effectiveness of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions after 3 years. J Dent Res 1999; 87 (Abstr 33).
25. Platt JA, Winkler MM, Matis BA, Moore BK. Correlation of dentin adhesive laboratory and clinical performance at two years. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 184 (Abstr 1368).
26. Abdalla A, Alhadainy HA. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: Two-year results. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 255-258.
27. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R. Tooth colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: A 24 month follow-up study. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 251-258.
28. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1240-1243.
29. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 1434-1442.
30. Braem M, Finger W, Van Doren VE, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 346-349.
31. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lemaire V, Mortier M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. One-year clinical effectiveness of two total-etch dentin adhesive systems in cervical lesions. J Dent Res 1999; 85 (Abstr 17).
32. Mandras RS, Thurmond JW, Latta MA, Matranga LF, Kildee JM, Barkmeier WW. Three-year clinical evaluation of the Clearfil Liner Bond System. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 266-270.
33. Alhadainy HA, Abdalla AS. 2-year clinical evaluation of dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 77-79.
34. Bishara SE, Vonwald L, Laffoon JF, Jakobsen JR. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin reinforced glass ionomer adhesive. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 288-294.
35. Peumans M, Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Structure of anterior composites related to their clinical behaviour. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 621 (Abstr 100).
36. Lambrechts P, Ameye C, Vanherle G. Conventional and microfilled composite resins. Part II: Chip fractures. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 527-538.
37. van Dijken JWV. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfilier, and hybrid composite resin fillings. Acta Odontol Scand 1986; 44: 357-367.
38. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: One-year results. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 687-692.
39. Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, Sidhu S. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 15-18.